IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i8p2048-d162382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Component Sizing for Peak Shaving in Battery Energy Storage System for Industrial Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Martins

    (Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada)

  • Holger C. Hesse

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Johanna Jungbauer

    (Smart Power GmbH & Co KG, 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Thomas Vorbuchner

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Petr Musilek

    (Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
    Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University Ostrava, 70800 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Recent attention to industrial peak shaving applications sparked an increased interest in battery energy storage. Batteries provide a fast and high power capability, making them an ideal solution for this task. This work proposes a general framework for sizing of battery energy storage system (BESS) in peak shaving applications. A cost-optimal sizing of the battery and power electronics is derived using linear programming based on local demand and billing scheme. A case study conducted with real-world industrial profiles shows the applicability of the approach as well as the return on investment dependence on the load profile. At the same time, the power flow optimization reveals the best storage operation patterns considering a trade-off between energy purchase, peak-power tariff, and battery aging. This underlines the need for a general mathematical optimization approach to efficiently tackle the challenge of peak shaving using an energy storage system. The case study also compares the applicability of yearly and monthly billing schemes, where the highest load of the year/month is the base for the price per kW. The results demonstrate that batteries in peak shaving applications can shorten the payback period when used for large industrial loads. They also show the impacts of peak shaving variation on the return of investment and battery aging of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Martins & Holger C. Hesse & Johanna Jungbauer & Thomas Vorbuchner & Petr Musilek, 2018. "Optimal Component Sizing for Peak Shaving in Battery Energy Storage System for Industrial Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:2048-:d:162382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2048/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2048/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O. Schmidt & A. Hawkes & A. Gambhir & I. Staffell, 2017. "The future cost of electrical energy storage based on experience rates," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 2(8), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Holger C. Hesse & Michael Schimpe & Daniel Kucevic & Andreas Jossen, 2017. "Lithium-Ion Battery Storage for the Grid—A Review of Stationary Battery Storage System Design Tailored for Applications in Modern Power Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-42, December.
    3. Claudia Rahmann & Benjamin Mac-Clure & Vijay Vittal & Felipe Valencia, 2017. "Break-Even Points of Battery Energy Storage Systems for Peak Shaving Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Beck, T. & Kondziella, H. & Huard, G. & Bruckner, T., 2016. "Assessing the influence of the temporal resolution of electrical load and PV generation profiles on self-consumption and sizing of PV-battery systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 331-342.
    5. A. Stephan & B. Battke & M. D. Beuse & J. H. Clausdeinken & T. S. Schmidt, 2016. "Limiting the public cost of stationary battery deployment by combining applications," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(7), pages 1-9, July.
    6. Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong & Dooner, Mark & Clarke, Jonathan, 2015. "Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 511-536.
    7. Holger C. Hesse & Rodrigo Martins & Petr Musilek & Maik Naumann & Cong Nam Truong & Andreas Jossen, 2017. "Economic Optimization of Component Sizing for Residential Battery Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Merei, Ghada & Moshövel, Janina & Magnor, Dirk & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2016. "Optimization of self-consumption and techno-economic analysis of PV-battery systems in commercial applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-178.
    9. Björn Nykvist & Måns Nilsson, 2015. "Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 329-332, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beuse, Martin & Dirksmeier, Mathias & Steffen, Bjarne & Schmidt, Tobias S., 2020. "Profitability of commercial and industrial photovoltaics and battery projects in South-East-Asia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    2. Holger C. Hesse & Michael Schimpe & Daniel Kucevic & Andreas Jossen, 2017. "Lithium-Ion Battery Storage for the Grid—A Review of Stationary Battery Storage System Design Tailored for Applications in Modern Power Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-42, December.
    3. Schram, Wouter L. & Lampropoulos, Ioannis & van Sark, Wilfried G.J.H.M., 2018. "Photovoltaic systems coupled with batteries that are optimally sized for household self-consumption: Assessment of peak shaving potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 69-81.
    4. Schopfer, S. & Tiefenbeck, V. & Staake, T., 2018. "Economic assessment of photovoltaic battery systems based on household load profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 229-248.
    5. Kalkbrenner, Bernhard J., 2019. "Residential vs. community battery storage systems – Consumer preferences in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1355-1363.
    6. Han, Xuejiao & Garrison, Jared & Hug, Gabriela, 2022. "Techno-economic analysis of PV-battery systems in Switzerland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Holger C. Hesse & Rodrigo Martins & Petr Musilek & Maik Naumann & Cong Nam Truong & Andreas Jossen, 2017. "Economic Optimization of Component Sizing for Residential Battery Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Stefan Arens & Sunke Schlüters & Benedikt Hanke & Karsten von Maydell & Carsten Agert, 2020. "Sustainable Residential Energy Supply: A Literature Review-Based Morphological Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, January.
    9. Wu, Wei & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Application value of energy storage in power grid: A special case of China electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1191-1199.
    10. Lahnaoui, Amin & Stenzel, Peter & Linssen, Jochen, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of photovoltaic battery system configuration and location☆," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 497-505.
    11. Koskela, Juha & Rautiainen, Antti & Järventausta, Pertti, 2019. "Using electrical energy storage in residential buildings – Sizing of battery and photovoltaic panels based on electricity cost optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1175-1189.
    12. Shabani, Masoume & Wallin, Fredrik & Dahlquist, Erik & Yan, Jinyue, 2022. "Techno-economic assessment of battery storage integrated into a grid-connected and solar-powered residential building under different battery ageing models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    13. Alejandro Pena-Bello & Edward Barbour & Marta C. Gonzalez & Selin Yilmaz & Martin K. Patel & David Parra, 2020. "How Does the Electricity Demand Profile Impact the Attractiveness of PV-Coupled Battery Systems Combining Applications?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Parra, David & Mauger, Romain, 2022. "A new dawn for energy storage: An interdisciplinary legal and techno-economic analysis of the new EU legal framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    15. Englberger, Stefan & Abo Gamra, Kareem & Tepe, Benedikt & Schreiber, Michael & Jossen, Andreas & Hesse, Holger, 2021. "Electric vehicle multi-use: Optimizing multiple value streams using mobile storage systems in a vehicle-to-grid context," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    16. Lucas Deotti & Wanessa Guedes & Bruno Dias & Tiago Soares, 2020. "Technical and Economic Analysis of Battery Storage for Residential Solar Photovoltaic Systems in the Brazilian Regulatory Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-30, December.
    17. Stefan Englberger & Holger Hesse & Daniel Kucevic & Andreas Jossen, 2019. "A Techno-Economic Analysis of Vehicle-to-Building: Battery Degradation and Efficiency Analysis in the Context of Coordinated Electric Vehicle Charging," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Soini, Martin Christoph & Parra, David & Patel, Martin Kumar, 2020. "Does bulk electricity storage assist wind and solar in replacing dispatchable power production?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    19. Paulo Rotella Junior & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha & Sandra Naomi Morioka & Ivan Bolis & Gianfranco Chicco & Andrea Mazza & Karel Janda, 2021. "Economic Analysis of the Investments in Battery Energy Storage Systems: Review and Current Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.
    20. Bai, Bo & Xiong, Siqin & Song, Bo & Xiaoming, Ma, 2019. "Economic analysis of distributed solar photovoltaics with reused electric vehicle batteries as energy storage systems in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 213-229.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:2048-:d:162382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.