IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i4p1154-d503520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation Analysis of CO 2 -EOR Process and Feasibility of CO 2 Storage during EOR

Author

Listed:
  • Maja Arnaut

    (Department of Petroleum and Gas Engineering and Energy, Faculty of Mining, Geology, and Petroleum Engineering, Pierottijeva 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Domagoj Vulin

    (Department of Petroleum and Gas Engineering and Energy, Faculty of Mining, Geology, and Petroleum Engineering, Pierottijeva 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Gabriela José García Lamberg

    (Independent Researcher, Santiago 8320000, Chile)

  • Lucija Jukić

    (Department of Petroleum and Gas Engineering and Energy, Faculty of Mining, Geology, and Petroleum Engineering, Pierottijeva 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

In this study, oil production and retention were observed and compared in 72 reservoir simulation cases, after which an economic analysis for various CO 2 and oil prices was performed. Reservoir simulation cases comprise different combinations of water alternating gas (WAG) ratios, permeabilities, and well distances. These models were set at three different depths; thus different pressure and temperature conditions, to see the impact of miscibility on oil production and CO 2 sequestration. Those reservoir conditions affect oil production and CO 2 retention differently. The retention trend dependence on depth was not monotonic—optimal retention relative to the amount of injected CO 2 could be achieved at middle depths and mediocre permeability as well. Results reflecting different reservoir conditions and injection strategies are shown, and analysis including the utilization factor and the net present value was conducted to examine the feasibility of different scenarios. The analysis presented in this paper can serve as a guideline for multiparameter analysis and optimization of CO 2 -enhanced oil recovery (EOR) with a WAG injection strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Maja Arnaut & Domagoj Vulin & Gabriela José García Lamberg & Lucija Jukić, 2021. "Simulation Analysis of CO 2 -EOR Process and Feasibility of CO 2 Storage during EOR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-28, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:1154-:d:503520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/1154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/1154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ren, Bo & Duncan, Ian J., 2019. "Reservoir simulation of carbon storage associated with CO2 EOR in residual oil zones, San Andres formation of West Texas, Permian Basin, USA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 391-401.
    2. McCollum, David L & Ogden, Joan M, 2006. "Techno-Economic Models for Carbon Dioxide Compression, Transport, and Storage & Correlations for Estimating Carbon Dioxide Density and Viscosity," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1zg00532, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Tapia, John Frederick D. & Lee, Jui-Yuan & Ooi, Raymond E.H. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2016. "Optimal CO2 allocation and scheduling in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 337-345.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naghizadeh, Arefeh & Jafari, Saeed & Norouzi-Apourvari, Saied & Schaffie, Mahin & Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein, 2024. "Multi-objective optimization of water-alternating flue gas process using machine learning and nature-inspired algorithms in a real geological field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, H.D. & Chen, Y. & Ma, G.W., 2020. "Effects of capillary pressures on two-phase flow of immiscible carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery in fractured media," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Migo-Sumagang, Maria Victoria & Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B., 2023. "A multi-period model for optimizing negative emission technology portfolios with economic and carbon value discount rates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Verma, Aman & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 556-568.
    4. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 428-440.
    5. Sun, Alexander Y., 2020. "Optimal carbon storage reservoir management through deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Xiao, Caiyun & Ni, Hongjian & Shi, Xian, 2022. "Unsteady model for wellbore pressure transmission of carbon dioxide fracturing considering limited-flow outlet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    7. Cai, Mingyu & Su, Yuliang & Elsworth, Derek & Li, Lei & Fan, Liyao, 2021. "Hydro-mechanical-chemical modeling of sub-nanopore capillary-confinement on CO2-CCUS-EOR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    8. Eric Saffou & Arshad Raza & Raoof Gholami & Ciriako Aci & Jan van Bever Donker & Sofyan Salem & Udo Zimmermann & Mimonitu Opuwari & Leon Croukamp & Walter Romaric Elingou & Tapas Chatterjee & Musa S.D, 2022. "Full‐scale simulation of a nearly depleted gas field in South Africa for carbon utilisation and storage," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 12(4), pages 486-507, August.
    9. Shenghao Feng & Xiujian Peng & Philip Adams, 2021. "Energy and Economic Implications of Carbon Neutrality in China -- A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-318, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    10. Dai, Zhenxue & Zhang, Ye & Bielicki, Jeffrey & Amooie, Mohammad Amin & Zhang, Mingkan & Yang, Changbing & Zou, Youqin & Ampomah, William & Xiao, Ting & Jia, Wei & Middleton, Richard & Zhang, Wen & Sun, 2018. "Heterogeneity-assisted carbon dioxide storage in marine sediments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 876-883.
    11. Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    12. Liu, Huang & Yao, Desong & Yang, Bowen & Li, Huashi & Guo, Ping & Du, Jianfen & Wang, Jian & Yang, Shuokong & Wen, Lianhui, 2022. "Experimental investigation on the mechanism of low permeability natural gas extraction accompanied by carbon dioxide sequestration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    13. Edward H Owens & Samuel Chapman & Paul Allan, 2010. "The Impact of Carbon Capture and Storage on Coal Resource Depletion," Energy & Environment, , vol. 21(8), pages 925-936, December.
    14. Patange, Omkar S. & Garg, Amit & Jayaswal, Sachin, 2022. "An integrated bottom-up optimization to investigate the role of BECCS in transitioning towards a net-zero energy system: A case study from Gujarat, India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    15. Wang, Tao & Yu, Wei & Le Moullec, Yann & Liu, Fei & Xiong, Yili & He, Hui & Lu, Jiahui & Hsu, Emily & Fang, Mengxiang & Luo, Zhongyang, 2017. "Solvent regeneration by novel direct non-aqueous gas stripping process for post-combustion CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 23-32.
    16. Zeng, Bingxin & Zhu, Lei & Yao, Xing, 2020. "Policy choice for end-of-pipe abatement technology adoption under technological uncertainty," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 121-130.
    17. Suoton P. Peletiri & Nejat Rahmanian & Iqbal M. Mujtaba, 2018. "CO 2 Pipeline Design: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Calderón, Andrés J. & Pekney, Natalie J., 2020. "Optimization of enhanced oil recovery operations in unconventional reservoirs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    19. Natalie Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2019. "Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    20. Steele, Amanda Harker & Sharma, Smriti & Pena Cabra, Ivonne & Clahane, Luke & Iyengar, Arun, 2023. "A tool for measuring the system cost of replacement energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:1154-:d:503520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.