IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v36y2011i4p2202-2214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming process for hydrogen production

Author

Listed:
  • Boyano, A.
  • Blanco-Marigorta, A.M.
  • Morosuk, T.
  • Tsatsaronis, G.

Abstract

Steam methane reforming (SMR) is one of the most promising processes for hydrogen production. Several studies have demonstrated its advantages from the economic viewpoint. Nowadays process development is based on technical and economical aspects; however, in the near future, the environmental impact will play a significant role in the design of such processes. In this paper, an SMR process is studied from the viewpoint of overall environmental impact, using an exergoenvironmental analysis. This analysis presents the combination of exergy analysis and life cycle assessment. Components where chemical reactions occur are the most important plant components from the exergoenvironmental point of view, because, in general, there is a high environmental impact associated with these components. This is mainly caused by the exergy destruction within the components, and this in turn is mainly due to the chemical reactions. The obtained results show that the largest potential for reducing the overall environmental impact is associated with the combustion reactor, the steam reformer, the hydrogen separation unit and the major heat exchangers. The environmental impact in these components can mainly be reduced by improving their exergetic efficiency. A sensitivity analysis for some important exergoenvironmental variables is also presented in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Boyano, A. & Blanco-Marigorta, A.M. & Morosuk, T. & Tsatsaronis, G., 2011. "Exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming process for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2202-2214.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:4:p:2202-2214
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544210002902
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    2. Corrado, A. & Fiorini, P. & Sciubba, E., 2006. "Environmental assessment and extended exergy analysis of a “zero CO2 emission”, high-efficiency steam power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 3186-3198.
    3. Meyer, Lutz & Tsatsaronis, George & Buchgeister, Jens & Schebek, Liselotte, 2009. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluation of the environmental impact of energy conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 75-89.
    4. Bargigli, Silvia & Raugei, Marco & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2004. "Comparison of thermodynamic and environmental indexes of natural gas, syngas and hydrogen production processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2145-2159.
    5. Lambert, Jean & Sorin, Mikhail & Paris, Jean, 1997. "Analysis of oxygen-enriched combustion for steam methane reforming (SMR)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 22(8), pages 817-825.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Navid, P. & Blanco Marigorta, A.M. & Amidpour, M. & Hamedi, M.H., 2013. "New procedure for optimal design and evaluation of cogeneration system based on advanced exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 314-333.
    2. Picallo-Perez, Ana & Catrini, Pietro & Piacentino, Antonio & Sala, José-Mª, 2019. "A novel thermoeconomic analysis under dynamic operating conditions for space heating and cooling systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 819-837.
    3. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    4. Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2019. "Splitting physical exergy: Theory and application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 698-707.
    5. Seyam, Shaimaa & Dincer, Ibrahim & Agelin-Chaab, Martin, 2024. "Optimization and comparative evaluation of novel marine engines integrated with fuel cells using sustainable fuel choices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    6. Eduardo J. C. Cavalcanti & Daniel R. S. da Silva & Monica Carvalho, 2022. "Life Cycle and Exergoenvironmental Analyses of Ethanol: Performance of a Flex-Fuel Spark-Ignition Engine at Wide-Open Throttle Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Mergenthaler, Pieter & Schinkel, Arndt-Peter & Tsatsaronis, George, 2017. "Application of exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, and advanced exergy analyses to Carbon Black production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 898-907.
    8. Yang, Kun & He, Yiyun & Du, Na & Yan, Ping & Zhu, Neng & Chen, Yuzhu & Wang, Jun & Lund, Peter D., 2024. "Exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses of novel solar- and biomass-driven trigeneration system integrated with organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    9. Rocha, Danilo H.D. & Siqueira, Diana S. & Silva, Rogério J., 2021. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluating coal-fired power plants technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    10. Cassetti, G. & Rocco, M.V. & Colombo, E., 2014. "Exergy based methods for economic and risk design optimization of energy systems: Application to a gas turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 269-279.
    11. Cavalcanti, Eduardo J.C. & Carvalho, Monica & B. Azevedo, Jonathan L., 2019. "Exergoenvironmental results of a eucalyptus biomass-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    12. Seyam, Shaimaa & Dincer, Ibrahim & Agelin-Chaab, Martin, 2023. "A comprehensive assessment of a new hybrid combined marine engine using alternative fuel blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    13. Daniele Fiaschi & Giampaolo Manfrida & Karolina Petela & Federico Rossi & Adalgisa Sinicropi & Lorenzo Talluri, 2020. "Exergo-Economic and Environmental Analysis of a Solar Integrated Thermo-Electric Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Tsatsaronis, George & Morosuk, Tatiana & Koch, Daniela & Sorgenfrei, Max, 2013. "Understanding the thermodynamic inefficiencies in combustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 3-11.
    15. Khoshgoftar Manesh, Mohammad Hasan & Davadgaran, Soheil & Mousavi Rabeti, Seyed Alireza, 2024. "New procedure for designing an innovative biomass-solar-wind polygeneration system for sustainable production of power, freshwater, and ammonia using 6E analyses, carbon footprint, water footprint, an," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Rosseto de Faria, Pedro & Aiolfi Barone, Marcelo & Guedes dos Santos, Rodrigo & Santos, José Joaquim C.S., 2023. "The environment as a thermoeconomic diagram device for the systematic and automatic waste and environmental cost internalization in thermal systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Blanco-Marigorta, Ana M. & Masi, Marco & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2014. "Exergo-environmental analysis of a reverse osmosis desalination plant in Gran Canaria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 223-232.
    18. Akbulut, Ugur & Utlu, Zafer & Kincay, Olcay, 2016. "Exergy, exergoenvironmental and exergoeconomic evaluation of a heat pump-integrated wall heating system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 502-522.
    19. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Ayanoglu, Abdulkadir & Abusoglu, Aysegul, 2011. "Exergoeconomic assessment of a geothermal assisted high temperature steam electrolysis system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4422-4433.
    20. Keçebaş, Ali, 2016. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for a geothermal district heating system: An application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 391-400.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:4:p:2202-2214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.