IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i22p7472-d675200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structure of Remuneration as Assessed by Employees of the Energy Sector—Multivariate Correspondence Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Barczak

    (Faculty of Economics, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Ul. Janickiego 31, 71-270 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Izabela Dembińska

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering of Transport, Maritime University of Szczecin, Ul. Pobożnego 11, 70-507 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Tomasz Rostkowski

    (Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Business Administration, Human Capital Institute, Al. Niepodległości 162, 02-554 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska

    (Institute of Management, University of Szczecin, Cukrowa 8, 71-004 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Dorota Rozmus

    (Department of Economic and Financial Analysis, College of Finances, University of Economics in Katowice, Bogucicka 3a, 40-228 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

Remuneration policy is an element of company management. Remuneration systems should be flexible and evolutionary. They must consider not only the changes in the external environment but, most of all, the changing needs of the internal environment. In practice, this means aligning the company’s strategy and goals with the remuneration system. What is more, the remuneration policy must be consistent with all personnel substrategies, which should systematically create integrated human capital management. The aim of our research was to determine how employees perceive the appropriate structure of remuneration and how the relationships between the elements that make up the structure of remuneration are perceived. Energy sector employees were selected for the study, dividing the group of respondents by gender, age and level of education. The obtained data were submitted to multivariate correspondence analysis. The analysis of the perception map for the variables of gender, age and education, as well as the subjective assessment of the components of remuneration, allows the general assertion that both men and women believe that the amount of the fixed part of remuneration should be influenced by such elements as: work efficiency, education, seniority in the current place of employment, position in the hierarchy of the position held, as well as the level of salaries in the labor market. But people aged 60 and over with a vocational education tend to believe that the amount of the fixed part of remuneration should be influenced by collective agreements. Moreover, people aged 25–34 with higher education believe that the granting of additional benefits should not be affected by collective labor agreements.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Barczak & Izabela Dembińska & Tomasz Rostkowski & Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska & Dorota Rozmus, 2021. "Structure of Remuneration as Assessed by Employees of the Energy Sector—Multivariate Correspondence Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:22:p:7472-:d:675200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Álvarez de Toledo, Pablo & Núñez, Fernando & Usabiaga, Carlos, 2020. "Matching in segmented labor markets: An analytical proposal based on high-dimensional contingency tables," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 175-186.
    2. Milan Kovačević & Srđan Blagojević & Bojan Kuzmanović, 2020. "Sustainability of the Motivation Policy Model for Employees in State Administration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-29, September.
    3. J. Ignacio Garcia‐Perez & Juan F. Jimeno, 2007. "Public Sector Wage Gaps In Spanish Regions," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 75(4), pages 501-531, July.
    4. Mariana Strenitzerová & Karol Achimský, 2019. "Employee Satisfaction and Loyalty as a Part of Sustainable Human Resource Management in Postal Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Dominique Rouzies & Anne T. Coughlan & Erin Anderson & Dawn Iacobucci, 2009. "Determinants of Pay Levels and Structures in Sales Organizations," Post-Print hal-00491677, HAL.
    6. Trotter, Richard G. & Zacur, Susan Rawson & Stickney, Lisa T., 2017. "The new age of pay transparency," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 529-539.
    7. Maria M. Campos & Domenico Depalo & Evangelia Papapetrou & Javier J. Pérez & Roberto Ramos, 2017. "Understanding the public sector pay gap," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Colin Green & John S. Heywood, 2008. "Does Performance Pay Increase Job Satisfaction?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 75(300), pages 710-728, November.
    9. Rie Fujisawa & Gaétan Lafortune, 2008. "The Remuneration of General Practitioners and Specialists in 14 OECD Countries: What are the Factors Influencing Variations across Countries?," OECD Health Working Papers 41, OECD Publishing.
    10. Heisler, William, 2021. "Increasing pay transparency: A guide for change," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 73-81.
    11. Clark, Andrew E., 1997. "Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 341-372, December.
    12. Carolyn Stringer & Jeni Didham & Paul Theivananthampillai, 2011. "Motivation, pay satisfaction, and job satisfaction of front‐line employees," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 161-179, June.
    13. Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska & Izabela Dembińska & Agnieszka Barczak & Angelika Kędzierska-Szczepaniak & Krzysztof Szczepaniak & Radosław Depczyński & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2021. "Does Crowdsourcing as Part of User-Driven Innovation Activity Affect Its Results? An Empirical Analysis of R&D Departments in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Prince, J. Bruce & Lawler, Edward E., 1986. "Does salary discussion hurt the developmental performance appraisal?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 357-375, June.
    15. Rajiv D. Banker & Danlu Bu & Mihir N. Mehta, 2016. "Pay Gap and Performance in China," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(3), pages 501-531, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenli Yin & Dan Li & Maria Paz Salmador, 2022. "Institutional change of compensation policy and its impact on CEO turnover and firm performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2527-2552, November.
    2. Snežana Lekić & Jelena Vapa-Tankosić & Slavica Mandić & Jasmina Rajaković-Mijailović & Nemanja Lekić & Jelena Mijailović, 2020. "Analysis of the Quality of the Employee–Bank Relationship in Urban and Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Green, Colin P. & Heywood, John S., 2010. "Profit sharing and the quality of relations with the boss," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 859-867, October.
    4. Agnieszka Barczak & Natalia Marska-Dzioba & Tomasz Rostkowski & Dorota Rozmus, 2021. "Multiple Correspondence Analysis in the Study of Remuneration Fairness: Conclusions for Energy Companies—Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Getinet A. Haile, 2015. "Workplace Job Satisfaction in Britain: Evidence from Linked Employer–Employee Data," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 29(3), pages 225-242, September.
    6. repec:lan:wpaper:3169 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Patrice Laroche, 2016. "A Meta-Analysis of the Union–Job Satisfaction Relationship," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(4), pages 709-741, December.
    8. Laetitia Hauret & Ludivine Martin & Nessrine Omrani & Donald R Williams, 2022. "How do HRM practices improve employee satisfaction?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 972-996, May.
    9. Colin Peter Green & John Spencer Heywood & Parvinder Kler & Gareth Leeves, 2016. "Paradox lost," Working Papers 107134075, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    10. repec:lan:wpaper:3014 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. repec:lan:wpaper:2920 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Pouliakas, Konstantinos & Theodossiou, Ioannis, 2009. "Confronting Objections to Performance Pay: A Study of the Impact of Individual and Gain-sharing Incentives on the Job Satisfaction of British Employees," MPRA Paper 14244, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. C Green & J S Heywood, 2007. "Are flexible contracts bad for workers? Evidence from job satisfaction data," Working Papers 590927, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    14. Cristina Bernini & Alessandro Tampieri, 2023. "Much Ado about Salary: A Comparison of Monetary and Non-Monetary Components of Job Satisfaction," Working Papers - Economics wp2023_06.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    15. Colin P. Green & John S. Heywood & Parvinder Kler & Gareth Leeves, 2018. "Paradox Lost: The Disappearing Female Job Satisfaction Premium," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(3), pages 484-502, September.
    16. Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu & Simona-Andreea Apostu & Andreea Paul & Ionut Casuneanu, 2020. "Work Flexibility, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance among Romanian Employees—Implications for Sustainable Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-53, July.
    17. Konstantinos POULIAKAS & Ioannis THEODOSSIOU, 2010. "Differences in the job satisfaction of high-paid and low-paid workers across Europe," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 149(1), pages 1-29, March.
    18. Cheryl Carleton & Mary T. Kelly, 2016. "Alternative Work Arrangements and Job Satisfaction," Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series 32, Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics.
    19. K. Pouliakas & I. Theodossiou, 2009. "Confronting Objections To Performance Pay: The Impact Of Individual And Gain‐Sharing Incentives On Job Satisfaction," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 56(5), pages 662-684, November.
    20. Mark Gius, 2013. "The effects of merit pay on teacher job satisfaction," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(31), pages 4443-4451, November.
    21. Anna Fabry & Goedele Broeck & Miet Maertens, 2022. "Gender Inequality and Job Satisfaction in Senegal: A Multiple Mediation Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 2291-2311, June.
    22. Seunghee Yu & Chung Choe, 2021. "Gender differences in job satisfaction among disabled workers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, June.
    23. Paulo Aguiar Do Monte, 2011. "Job Dissatisfaction And Labour Turnover:Evidence From Brazil," Anais do XXXVIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 38th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 135, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:22:p:7472-:d:675200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.