IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i21p7407-d673806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method to Analyze the Performance of Geocooling Systems with Borehole Heat Exchangers. Results in a Monitored Residential Building in Southern Alps

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Belliardi

    (ISAAC (Institute for Applied Sustainability to the Built Environment), SUPSI (University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland), CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
    Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (ABC), Politecnico di Milano, IT-20133 Milano, Italy)

  • Nerio Cereghetti

    (ISAAC (Institute for Applied Sustainability to the Built Environment), SUPSI (University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland), CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland)

  • Paola Caputo

    (Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (ABC), Politecnico di Milano, IT-20133 Milano, Italy)

  • Simone Ferrari

    (Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (ABC), Politecnico di Milano, IT-20133 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

Geothermal heat is an increasingly adopted source for satisfying all thermal purposes in buildings by reversible heat pumps (HP). However, for residential buildings located in moderate climates, geocooling, that implies the use of geothermal source for cooling buildings without the operation of HP, is an efficient alternative for space cooling not yet explored enough. Geocooling allows two main benefits: to cool the buildings by high energy efficiencies improving summer comfort; to recharge the ground if space heating is provided by HP exploiting the geothermal source (GSHP). In these cases, geocooling allows to avoid the decreasing of the performances of the GSHP for space heating over the years. To explore these issues, a method has been developed and tested on a real case: a new residential building in Lugano (southern Switzerland) coupled with 13 borehole heat exchangers. The system provides space heating in winter by a GSHP and space cooling in summer by geocooling. During a 40 months monitoring campaign, data such as temperatures, heat flows and electricity consumptions were recorded to calibrate the model and verify the benefits of such configuration. Focusing on summer operation, the efficiency of the system, after the improvements implemented, is above 30, confirming, at least in similar contexts, the feasibility of geocooling. Achieved results provides knowledge for future installations, underlining the replication potential and the possible limits.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Belliardi & Nerio Cereghetti & Paola Caputo & Simone Ferrari, 2021. "A Method to Analyze the Performance of Geocooling Systems with Borehole Heat Exchangers. Results in a Monitored Residential Building in Southern Alps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7407-:d:673806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7407/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7407/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inayat, Abrar & Raza, Mohsin, 2019. "District cooling system via renewable energy sources: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 360-373.
    2. Paul Christodoulides & Ana Vieira & Stanislav Lenart & João Maranha & Gregor Vidmar & Rumen Popov & Aleksandar Georgiev & Lazaros Aresti & Georgios Florides, 2020. "Reviewing the Modeling Aspects and Practices of Shallow Geothermal Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-45, August.
    3. Pahud, D. & Belliardi, M. & Caputo, P., 2012. "Geocooling potential of borehole heat exchangers' systems applied to low energy office buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 197-204.
    4. Lyu, Weihua & Li, Xianting & Yan, Shuai & Jiang, Sihang, 2020. "Utilizing shallow geothermal energy to develop an energy efficient HVAC system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 672-682.
    5. McKenna, P. & Turner, W.J.N. & Finn, D.P., 2018. "Geocooling with integrated PCM thermal energy storage in a commercial building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 865-876.
    6. Javadi, Hossein & Mousavi Ajarostaghi, Seyed Soheil & Rosen, Marc A. & Pourfallah, Mohsen, 2019. "Performance of ground heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of recent advances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 207-233.
    7. Casasso, Alessandro & Sethi, Rajandrea, 2017. "Assessment and mapping of the shallow geothermal potential in the province of Cuneo (Piedmont, NW Italy)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 306-315.
    8. Fadejev, Jevgeni & Simson, Raimo & Kurnitski, Jarek & Haghighat, Fariborz, 2017. "A review on energy piles design, sizing and modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 390-407.
    9. Florides, Georgios & Kalogirou, Soteris, 2007. "Ground heat exchangers—A review of systems, models and applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(15), pages 2461-2478.
    10. Blum, Philipp & Campillo, Gisela & Kölbel, Thomas, 2011. "Techno-economic and spatial analysis of vertical ground source heat pump systems in Germany," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3002-3011.
    11. Sterpi, D. & Tomaselli, G. & Angelotti, A., 2020. "Energy performance of ground heat exchangers embedded in diaphragm walls: Field observations and optimization by numerical modelling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P2), pages 2748-2760.
    12. Biglarian, Hassan & Abbaspour, Madjid & Saidi, Mohammad Hassan, 2017. "A numerical model for transient simulation of borehole heat exchangers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 224-237.
    13. Sivasakthivel, T. & Philippe, Mikael & Murugesan, K. & Verma, Vikas & Hu, Pingfang, 2017. "Experimental thermal performance analysis of ground heat exchangers for space heating and cooling applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1168-1181.
    14. Narula, Kapil & Chambers, Jonathan & Streicher, Kai N. & Patel, Martin K., 2019. "Strategies for decarbonising the Swiss heating system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1119-1131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matteo Antelmi & Francesco Turrin & Andrea Zille & Roberto Fedrizzi, 2023. "A New Type in TRNSYS 18 for Simulation of Borehole Heat Exchangers Affected by Different Groundwater Flow Velocities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Riccardo Toffanin & Paola Caputo & Marco Belliardi & Vinicio Curti, 2022. "Low and Ultra-Low Temperature District Heating Equipped by Heat Pumps—An Analysis of the Best Operative Conditions for a Swiss Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Belliardi, Marco & Caputo, Paola & Ferla, Giulio & Cereghetti, Nerio & Antonioli Mantegazzini, Barbara, 2023. "An innovative application of 5GDHC: A techno-economic assessment of shallow geothermal systems potential in different European climates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javadi, Hossein & Mousavi Ajarostaghi, Seyed Soheil & Rosen, Marc A. & Pourfallah, Mohsen, 2019. "Performance of ground heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of recent advances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 207-233.
    2. Romanov, D. & Leiss, B., 2022. "Geothermal energy at different depths for district heating and cooling of existing and future building stock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Lazaros Aresti & Paul Christodoulides & Gregoris P. Panayiotou & Georgios Florides, 2020. "Residential Buildings’ Foundations as a Ground Heat Exchanger and Comparison among Different Types in a Moderate Climate Country," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Luka Boban & Dino Miše & Stjepan Herceg & Vladimir Soldo, 2021. "Application and Design Aspects of Ground Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-31, April.
    5. Kappler, Genyr & Dias, João Batista & Haeberle, Fernanda & Wander, Paulo Roberto & Moraes, Carlos Alberto Mendes & Modolo, Regina Célia Espinosa, 2019. "Study of an earth-to-water heat exchange system which relies on underground water tanks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1236-1246.
    6. Seokjae Lee & Sangwoo Park & Taek Hee Han & Jongmuk Won & Hangseok Choi, 2023. "Applicability Evaluation of Energy Slabs Installed in an Underground Parking Lot," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Somogyi, Viola & Sebestyén, Viktor & Nagy, Georgina, 2017. "Scientific achievements and regulation of shallow geothermal systems in six European countries – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 934-952.
    8. Aizhao Zhou & Xianwen Huang & Wei Wang & Pengming Jiang & Xinwei Li, 2021. "Thermo-Hydraulic Performance of U-Tube Borehole Heat Exchanger with Different Cross-Sections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Böttcher, Fabian & Casasso, Alessandro & Götzl, Gregor & Zosseder, Kai, 2019. "TAP - Thermal aquifer Potential: A quantitative method to assess the spatial potential for the thermal use of groundwater," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 85-95.
    10. Taurines, Kevin & Giroux-Julien, Stéphanie & Farid, Mohammed & Ménézo, Christophe, 2021. "Numerical modelling of a building integrated earth-to-air heat exchanger," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    11. Adriana Greco & Edison Gundabattini & Darius Gnanaraj Solomon & Raja Singh Rassiah & Claudia Masselli, 2022. "A Review on Geothermal Renewable Energy Systems for Eco-Friendly Air-Conditioning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Arghand, Taha & Javed, Saqib & Trüschel, Anders & Dalenbäck, Jan-Olof, 2021. "Cooling of office buildings in cold climates using direct ground-coupled active chilled beams," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 122-132.
    13. Stegnar, Gašper & Staničić, D. & Česen, M. & Čižman, J. & Pestotnik, S. & Prestor, J. & Urbančič, A. & Merše, S., 2019. "A framework for assessing the technical and economic potential of shallow geothermal energy in individual and district heating systems: A case study of Slovenia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 405-420.
    14. Karytsas, Spyridon & Choropanitis, Ioannis, 2017. "Barriers against and actions towards renewable energy technologies diffusion: A Principal Component Analysis for residential ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 252-271.
    15. Laveet Kumar & Md. Shouquat Hossain & Mamdouh El Haj Assad & Mansoor Urf Manoo, 2022. "Technological Advancements and Challenges of Geothermal Energy Systems: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    16. McKenna, P. & Turner, W.J.N. & Finn, D.P., 2018. "Geocooling with integrated PCM thermal energy storage in a commercial building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 865-876.
    17. Carotenuto, Alberto & Ciccolella, Michela & Massarotti, Nicola & Mauro, Alessandro, 2016. "Models for thermo-fluid dynamic phenomena in low enthalpy geothermal energy systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 330-355.
    18. Luo, Jin & Zhao, Haifeng & Jia, Jia & Xiang, Wei & Rohn, Joachim & Blum, Philipp, 2017. "Study on operation management of borehole heat exchangers for a large-scale hybrid ground source heat pump system in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 340-352.
    19. Korhonen, Kimmo & Markó, Ábel & Bischoff, Alan & Szijártó, Márk & Mádl-Szőnyi, Judit, 2023. "Infinite borehole field model—a new approach to estimate the shallow geothermal potential of urban areas applied to central Budapest, Hungary," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 263-274.
    20. Su, Xing & Chen, Chaoyang & Huang, Yixiang & Tian, Shaochen & Xia, Jihao & Liu, Jun & Yu, Yuanbo, 2024. "System reliability study of geothermal energy walls in subway stations based on rapid thermal performance prediction model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7407-:d:673806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.