IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i21p7048-d666495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chemostratigraphic Analysis of Wufeng and Longmaxi Formation in Changning, Sichuan, China: Achieved by Principal Component and Constrained Clustering Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhifeng Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Biological and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    School of the Earth Science and Resources, China University of Geoscience, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yongjian Huang

    (State Key Laboratory of Biological and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    School of the Earth Science and Resources, China University of Geoscience, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Bo Ran

    (State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Wei Liu

    (Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey, Chengdu 610082, China)

  • Xiang Li

    (School of the Earth Science and Resources, China University of Geoscience, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Chengshan Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Biological and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    School of the Earth Science and Resources, China University of Geoscience, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The increasing proportion of unconventional worldwide energy demands have consistently promoted the necessity for exploring a precise, high-resolution, objective, and quantitative stratigraphic division method for macroscopically homogeneous mudstone successions. The chemostratigraphy can resolve this problem well, although it has been applied successfully in North America, but not systematically studied in China for shale gas exploration and development. This work has conducted a chemostratigraphic analysis of Wufeng and Longmaxi Formation on the Changning section of Sichuan Province, southwestern China, to testify its applicability for shale gas exploration in China. Principal component analysis (PCA) was first employed to reduce the dimensionality of datasets. Three chemofacies, including detrital (K, Ti, Fe, Al, Na, Mg, Cr, Zr, Rb), authigenic (Ca, Sr, Mn, Si, S, Ba), and redox-organic (P, V, Ni, Zn, Cu, TOC), were found. Subsequently, constrained clustering analysis was utilized for the zonation of each chemofacies into chemozones. Consequently, the whole Changning section was divided into twelve chemozones (CZ I–CZ Ⅻ). The geochemical interpretation for these chemozones can be resolved from the regional changes in paleogeography and paleoceanography during the Late Ordovician to Early Silurian period. Thus, a three-stage geochemical evolution along the Changning section can be classified: (1) the siliceous and anoxic deposits of Wufeng Formation (CZ I–CZ III) with high TOC contents; (2) the siliceous and anoxic sedimentary rocks of bottom Longmaxi Formation with still higher TOC (CZ Ⅳ); (3) the calcarous-detrital and oxic sediments for the rest of Longmaxi Formation (CZ Ⅴ–CZ Ⅻ). In considering their high content of TOC and abundant brittle siliceous minerals, the CZ (I–Ⅳ, 0 m–33.6 m) are thought to be the most preferable sweet spot for shale gas exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhifeng Zhang & Yongjian Huang & Bo Ran & Wei Liu & Xiang Li & Chengshan Wang, 2021. "Chemostratigraphic Analysis of Wufeng and Longmaxi Formation in Changning, Sichuan, China: Achieved by Principal Component and Constrained Clustering Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7048-:d:666495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7048/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7048/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Shangbin & Zhu, Yanming & Wang, Hongyan & Liu, Honglin & Wei, Wei & Fang, Junhua, 2011. "Shale gas reservoir characterisation: A typical case in the southern Sichuan Basin of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6609-6616.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tadeusz Kwilosz & Bogdan Filar & Mariusz Miziołek, 2022. "Use of Cluster Analysis to Group Organic Shale Gas Rocks by Hydrocarbon Generation Zones," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Ewa Krzeszowska, 2024. "Chemostratigraphic Approach to the Study of Resources’ Deposit in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yin, Hong & Zhou, Junping & Xian, Xuefu & Jiang, Yongdong & Lu, Zhaohui & Tan, Jingqiang & Liu, Guojun, 2017. "Experimental study of the effects of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation on the mechanical characteristics of organic-rich shales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 84-95.
    2. Xiaoyan Zou & Xianqing Li & Jizhen Zhang & Huantong Li & Man Guo & Pei Zhao, 2021. "Characteristics of Pore Structure and Gas Content of the Lower Paleozoic Shale from the Upper Yangtze Plate, South China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-29, November.
    3. Qin, Chao & Jiang, Yongdong & Zuo, Shuangying & Chen, Shiwan & Xiao, Siyou & Liu, Zhengjie, 2021. "Investigation of adsorption kinetics of CH4 and CO2 on shale exposure to supercritical CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    4. Chen, Junqing & Jiang, Fujie & Cong, Qi & Pang, Xiongqi & Ma, Kuiyou & Shi, Kanyuan & Pang, Bo & Chen, Dongxia & Pang, Hong & Yang, Xiaobin & Wang, Yuying & Li, Bingyao, 2023. "Adsorption characteristics of shale gas in organic–inorganic slit pores," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    5. Zhiyao Zhang & Shang Xu & Qiyang Gou & Qiqi Li, 2022. "Reservoir Characteristics and Resource Potential of Marine Shale in South China: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Yuanyuan Tian & Qing Chen & Changhui Yan & Hongde Chen & Yanqing He & Yufeng He, 2022. "A New Adsorption Equation for Nano-Porous Shale Rocks and Its Application in Pore Size Distribution Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, April.
    7. Gou, Qiyang & Xu, Shang & Hao, Fang & Yang, Feng & Shu, Zhiguo & Liu, Rui, 2021. "The effect of tectonic deformation and preservation condition on the shale pore structure using adsorption-based textural quantification and 3D image observation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    8. Yang, Xu & Zhou, Wenning & Liu, Xunliang & Yan, Yuying, 2020. "A multiscale approach for simulation of shale gas transport in organic nanopores," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Dai, Xuguang & Wei, Chongtao & Wang, Meng & Ma, Ruying & Song, Yu & Zhang, Junjian & Wang, Xiaoqi & Shi, Xuan & Vandeginste, Veerle, 2023. "Interaction mechanism of supercritical CO2 with shales and a new quantitative storage capacity evaluation method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    10. Wensong Huang & Ping Wang & Gang Hui & Xiangwen Kong & Yuepeng Jia & Lei Huang & Yufei Bai & Zhiyang Pi & Ye Li & Fuyu Yao & Penghu Bao & Yujie Zhang, 2024. "Unconventional Fracture Networks Simulation and Shale Gas Production Prediction by Integration of Petrophysics, Geomechanics and Fracture Characterization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Wang, Wenyang & Pang, Xiongqi & Chen, Zhangxin & Chen, Dongxia & Zheng, Tianyu & Luo, Bing & Li, Jing & Yu, Rui, 2019. "Quantitative prediction of oil and gas prospects of the Sinian-Lower Paleozoic in the Sichuan Basin in central China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 861-872.
    12. Wang, Sha & Jiang, Xiumin & Han, Xiangxin & Tong, Jianhui, 2012. "Investigation of Chinese oil shale resources comprehensive utilization performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 224-232.
    13. Bryan X. Medina-Rodriguez & Vladimir Alvarado, 2021. "Use of Gas Adsorption and Inversion Methods for Shale Pore Structure Characterization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    14. Lu, Yiyu & Chen, Xiayu & Tang, Jiren & Li, Honglian & Zhou, Lei & Han, Shuaibin & Ge, Zhaolong & Xia, Binwei & Shen, Huajian & Zhang, Jing, 2019. "Relationship between pore structure and mechanical properties of shale on supercritical carbon dioxide saturation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 270-285.
    15. Hui, Gang & Chen, Zhangxin & Wang, Youjing & Zhang, Dongmei & Gu, Fei, 2023. "An integrated machine learning-based approach to identifying controlling factors of unconventional shale productivity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    16. Mihail Nikolaevich Dudin & Nikolaj Vasilevich Lyasnikov & Vladimir Dmitriyevich Sekerin & Anna Evgenevna Gorohova & Vyacheslav Viktorovich Burlakov, 2016. "Provision of Energy Security at the National Level in the Context of the Global Gas Transportation Industry Development," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 6(2), pages 234-242.
    17. Qin, Chao & Jiang, Yongdong & Luo, Yahuang & Zhou, Junping & Liu, Hao & Song, Xiao & Li, Dong & Zhou, Feng & Xie, Yingliang, 2020. "Effect of supercritical CO2 saturation pressures and temperatures on the methane adsorption behaviours of Longmaxi shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    18. Lu, Yiyu & Xu, Zijie & Li, Honglian & Tang, Jiren & Chen, Xiayu, 2021. "The influences of super-critical CO2 saturation on tensile characteristics and failure modes of shales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    19. Chunhui Cao & Liwu Li & Yuhu Liu & Li Du & Zhongping Li & Jian He, 2020. "Factors Affecting Shale Gas Chemistry and Stable Isotope and Noble Gas Isotope Composition and Distribution: A Case Study of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Shale Gas, Sichuan Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Gang Hui & Fei Gu & Junqi Gan & Erfan Saber & Li Liu, 2023. "An Integrated Approach to Reservoir Characterization for Evaluating Shale Productivity of Duvernary Shale: Insights from Multiple Linear Regression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7048-:d:666495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.