IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i22p8696-d977786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reservoir Characteristics and Resource Potential of Marine Shale in South China: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiyao Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Shang Xu

    (Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Deep Oil & Gas, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
    Current address: School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Changjiangxi Road No. 66, Qingdao 266580, China.)

  • Qiyang Gou

    (Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Qiqi Li

    (Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Many sets of Paleozoic marine organic-rich shale strata have developed in South China. However, the exploration and development results of these shale formations are quite different. Based on the data of core experiment analysis, drilling, fracturing test of typical wells, the reservoir differences and controlling factors of four sets of typical marine organic-rich shale in southern China are investigated. The four sets of shale have obvious differences in reservoir characteristics. Ordovician–Silurian shale mainly develops siliceous shale, mixed shale and argillaceous shale, with large pore diameter, high porosity, moderate thermal maturity, large pore volume and specific surface area. Cambrian shale mainly develops siliceous shale and mixed shale, with small pore diameter, low porosity, high thermal maturity and smaller pore volume and specific surface area than Ordovician–Silurian shale. Devonian–Carboniferous shale has similar mineral composition to Ordovician–Silurian shale, with small pore diameter, low porosity, moderate thermal maturity and similar pore volume and specific surface area to that of Cambrian shale. Permian shale has very complex mineral composition, with large pore diameter, low to medium thermal maturity and small specific surface area. Mineral composition, thermal maturity and tectonic preservation conditions are the main factors controlling shale reservoir development. Siliceous minerals in Cambrian shale and Ordovician–Silurian shale are mainly of biological origin, which make the support capacity better than Devonian–Carboniferous shale and Permian shale (siliceous minerals are mainly of terrigenous origin and biological origin). Thermal maturity of Ordovician–Silurian shale and Devonian–Carboniferous shale is moderate, with a large number of organic pores developed. Thermal maturity of Cambrian shale and Permian shale is respectively too high and too low, the development of organic pores is significantly weaker than the two sets of shale above. There are obvious differences in tectonic preservation conditions inside and outside the Sichuan Basin. Shale reservoirs inside the Sichuan Basin are characterized by overpressure due to stable tectonic activities, while shale reservoirs outside the Sichuan Basin are generally normal–pressure. Four sets of marine shale in South China all have certain resource potentials, but the exploration and development of shale gas is still constrained by complicated geological conditions, single economic shale formation, high exploration and development costs and other aspects. It is necessary for further research on shale gas accumulation theory, exploration and development technology and related policies to promote the development of China’s shale gas industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiyao Zhang & Shang Xu & Qiyang Gou & Qiqi Li, 2022. "Reservoir Characteristics and Resource Potential of Marine Shale in South China: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8696-:d:977786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8696/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8696/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haitao Guo & Yongsheng Wang & Zhongmin Wang, 2016. "Shale Development and China," Natural Resource Management and Policy, in: Yongsheng Wang & William E. Hefley (ed.), The Global Impact of Unconventional Shale Gas Development, pages 131-147, Springer.
    2. Chen, Shangbin & Zhu, Yanming & Wang, Hongyan & Liu, Honglin & Wei, Wei & Fang, Junhua, 2011. "Shale gas reservoir characterisation: A typical case in the southern Sichuan Basin of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6609-6616.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiyang Gou & Shang Xu, 2023. "The Controls of Laminae on Lacustrine Shale Oil Content in China: A Review from Generation, Retention, and Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Qiang & Zhan, Lina, 2019. "Assessing the sustainability of the shale gas industry by combining DPSIRM model and RAGA-PP techniques: An empirical analysis of Sichuan and Chongqing, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 353-364.
    2. Yin, Hong & Zhou, Junping & Xian, Xuefu & Jiang, Yongdong & Lu, Zhaohui & Tan, Jingqiang & Liu, Guojun, 2017. "Experimental study of the effects of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation on the mechanical characteristics of organic-rich shales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 84-95.
    3. Xiaoyan Zou & Xianqing Li & Jizhen Zhang & Huantong Li & Man Guo & Pei Zhao, 2021. "Characteristics of Pore Structure and Gas Content of the Lower Paleozoic Shale from the Upper Yangtze Plate, South China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-29, November.
    4. Qin, Chao & Jiang, Yongdong & Zuo, Shuangying & Chen, Shiwan & Xiao, Siyou & Liu, Zhengjie, 2021. "Investigation of adsorption kinetics of CH4 and CO2 on shale exposure to supercritical CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Chen, Junqing & Jiang, Fujie & Cong, Qi & Pang, Xiongqi & Ma, Kuiyou & Shi, Kanyuan & Pang, Bo & Chen, Dongxia & Pang, Hong & Yang, Xiaobin & Wang, Yuying & Li, Bingyao, 2023. "Adsorption characteristics of shale gas in organic–inorganic slit pores," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Zhou, Junping & Tian, Shifeng & Zhou, Lei & Xian, Xuefu & Yang, Kang & Jiang, Yongdong & Zhang, Chengpeng & Guo, Yaowen, 2020. "Experimental investigation on the influence of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation time on the permeability of fractured shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Xiaoqian Guo & Qiang Yan & Anjian Wang, 2017. "Assessment of Methods for Forecasting Shale Gas Supply in China Based on Economic Considerations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Piotr Słomski & Maria Mastalerz & Jacek Szczepański & Arkadiusz Derkowski & Tomasz Topór & Marcin Lutyński, 2020. "Experimental and numerical investigation of CO2–brine–rock interactions in the early Palaeozoic mudstones from the Polish part of the Baltic Basin at simulatedin situ conditions," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(3), pages 567-590, June.
    9. Zhou, Zhongbing & Qin, Quande, 2020. "Epistemological dominance and ignorance of the comparative advantages of China's shale gas: Evidence from international scientific journals," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Yuanyuan Tian & Qing Chen & Changhui Yan & Hongde Chen & Yanqing He & Yufeng He, 2022. "A New Adsorption Equation for Nano-Porous Shale Rocks and Its Application in Pore Size Distribution Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Gou, Qiyang & Xu, Shang & Hao, Fang & Yang, Feng & Shu, Zhiguo & Liu, Rui, 2021. "The effect of tectonic deformation and preservation condition on the shale pore structure using adsorption-based textural quantification and 3D image observation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    12. Yang, Xu & Zhou, Wenning & Liu, Xunliang & Yan, Yuying, 2020. "A multiscale approach for simulation of shale gas transport in organic nanopores," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    13. Leifu Zhang & Qun Zhao & Sizhong Peng & Zhen Qiu & Congjun Feng & Qin Zhang & Yuman Wang & Dazhong Dong & Shangwen Zhou, 2021. "Paleoenvironment and Organic Matter Accumulation Mechanism of Marine–Continental Transitional Shales: Outcrop Characterizations of the Carboniferous–Permian Strata, Ordos Basin, North China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Dai, Xuguang & Wei, Chongtao & Wang, Meng & Ma, Ruying & Song, Yu & Zhang, Junjian & Wang, Xiaoqi & Shi, Xuan & Vandeginste, Veerle, 2023. "Interaction mechanism of supercritical CO2 with shales and a new quantitative storage capacity evaluation method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    15. Wensong Huang & Ping Wang & Gang Hui & Xiangwen Kong & Yuepeng Jia & Lei Huang & Yufei Bai & Zhiyang Pi & Ye Li & Fuyu Yao & Penghu Bao & Yujie Zhang, 2024. "Unconventional Fracture Networks Simulation and Shale Gas Production Prediction by Integration of Petrophysics, Geomechanics and Fracture Characterization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Wang, Xu & Fang, Hong & Fang, Siran, 2020. "An integrated approach for exploitation block selection of shale gas—based on cloud model and grey relational analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Wen Li & Yuxi Liu & Siqi Xiao & Yu Zhang & Lihe Chai, 2018. "An Investigation of the Underlying Evolution of Shale Gas Research’s Domain Based on the Co-Word Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Wang, Wenyang & Pang, Xiongqi & Chen, Zhangxin & Chen, Dongxia & Zheng, Tianyu & Luo, Bing & Li, Jing & Yu, Rui, 2019. "Quantitative prediction of oil and gas prospects of the Sinian-Lower Paleozoic in the Sichuan Basin in central China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 861-872.
    19. Wang, Sha & Jiang, Xiumin & Han, Xiangxin & Tong, Jianhui, 2012. "Investigation of Chinese oil shale resources comprehensive utilization performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 224-232.
    20. Liuyang Yao & Dangchen Sui & Xiaotong Liu & Hui Fan, 2020. "The Psychological Process of Residents’ Acceptance of Local Shale Gas Exploitation in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8696-:d:977786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.