IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i10p2770-d552881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility Method as an Instrument of the Quality of Life Assessment Using the Examples of Selected European Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Przybyłowski

    (Department of Quality Management, Gdynia Maritime University, 81225 Gdynia, Poland)

  • Adam Przybyłowski

    (Department of Transport and Logistics, Gdynia Maritime University, 81225 Gdynia, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Kałaska

    (Department of Finance and Management, WSB University in Gdańsk, 80266 Gdańsk, Poland)

Abstract

Improving quality of life still remains the main goal of strategic documents and is promoted by leaders on the global, national, regional, and local levels. Moreover, this ambitious challenge should be consistent with the principles of sustainable development, including the social, economic, and environmental aspects. The ISO 37120 indicators within the World Council on City Data (WCCD) database may be used to monitor the urban performance over time. However, the interpretation of the results is not always easy and sometimes requires a complex analysis. The aim of this paper was to investigate the possibility of illustrating in a transparent way the urban quality of life using the utility method. This study also presents that this method may facilitate making data-driven decisions on urban management, planning and investment. Thus, it may be useful for decision makers and help cities and communities of all sizes to become more sustainable, safe and resilient, prosperous, inclusive, and smart. The analysis has been carried out using the examples of selected European cities: Amsterdam, Gdynia, London, and Zagreb. The hypothesis reads as follows: it is possible to use the total and partial utility method in order to assess the level of urban quality of life with regard to the three dimensions of sustainable development in order to monitor progress and results and prioritize and implement the changes within urban policy. Research results indicate that there are significant differences between the compared cities within the economic, social, and ecological aspects. This analysis may constitute an introduction to the development of more complex models in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Przybyłowski & Adam Przybyłowski & Agnieszka Kałaska, 2021. "Utility Method as an Instrument of the Quality of Life Assessment Using the Examples of Selected European Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:10:p:2770-:d:552881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/10/2770/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/10/2770/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergey Bobylev & Olga Kudryavtseva & Sofya Solovyova, 2014. "Sustainable development indicators for cities," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 101-110.
    2. Arthur Lehner & Christoph Erlacher & Matthias Schlögl & Jacob Wegerer & Thomas Blaschke & Klaus Steinnocher, 2018. "Can ISO-Defined Urban Sustainability Indicators Be Derived from Remote Sensing: An Expert Weighting Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-31, April.
    3. Miguel Á. García-Fuentes & Cristina de Torre, 2017. "Towards smarter and more sustainable regenerative cities: the REMOURBAN model," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(3), pages 328-338, March.
    4. Ghaeth Fandi & Vladimír Krepl & Ibrahim Ahmad & Famous O. Igbinovia & Tatiana Ivanova & Soliman Fandie & Zdenek Muller & Josef Tlusty, 2018. "Design of an Emergency Energy System for a City Assisted by Renewable Energy, Case Study: Latakia, Syria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Rafal Nagaj & Jaroslaw Korpysa, 2020. "Impact of COVID-19 on the Level of Energy Poverty in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Antonia Gravagnuolo & Mariarosaria Angrisano & Luigi Fusco Girard, 2019. "Circular Economy Strategies in Eight Historic Port Cities: Criteria and Indicators Towards a Circular City Assessment Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Tomasz Neumann, 2021. "The Impact of Carsharing on Transport in the City. Case Study of Tri-City in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Vasilis C. Kapsalis & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Konstantinos G. Aravossis, 2019. "Investigation of Ecosystem Services and Circular Economy Interactions under an Inter-organizational Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, May.
    9. Danuta Szpilko, 2020. "Foresight as a Tool for the Planning and Implementation of Visions for Smart City Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Andrzej Łebkowski, 2019. "Studies of Energy Consumption by a City Bus Powered by a Hybrid Energy Storage System in Variable Road Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-39, March.
    11. Marcin Połom & Maciej Tarkowski & Krystian Puzdrakiewicz & Łukasz Dopierała, 2020. "Is It Possible to Develop Electromobility in Urban Passenger Shipping in Post-Communist Countries? Evidence from Gdańsk, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Tomasz Jeleński & Marta Dendys & Barbara Tomaszewska & Leszek Pająk, 2020. "The Potential of RES in the Reduction of Air Pollution: The SWOT Analysis of Smart Energy Management Solutions for Krakow Functional Area (KrOF)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, April.
    13. Maja Kiba-Janiak & Jarosław Witkowski, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: How Do They Work?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Fu, Bo & Yu, Danlin & Zhang, Yaojun, 2019. "The livable urban landscape: GIS and remote sensing extracted land use assessment for urban livability in Changchun Proper, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Victoria Hurth & Patricia McCarney, 2015. "International standards for climate-friendly cities," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1025-1026, December.
    16. Cristina ALPOPI & Cristina MANOLE & Sofia Elena COLESCA, 2011. "Assessment Of The Sustainable Urban Development Level Through The Use Of Indicators Of Sustainability," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(2), pages 78-87, May.
    17. Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2021. "Stakeholders’ Analysis of Environmental Sustainability in Urban Logistics: A Case Study of Tricity, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat & Aboushaqrah, Nour N.M. & Jabbar, Rateb, 2019. "How sustainable is electric mobility? A comprehensive sustainability assessment approach for the case of Qatar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 461-477.
    19. Chiara Garau & Valentina Maria Pavan, 2018. "Evaluating Urban Quality: Indicators and Assessment Tools for Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rabia Bovkir & Eda Ustaoglu & Arif Cagdas Aydinoglu, 2023. "Assessment of Urban Quality of Life Index at Local Scale with Different Weighting Approaches," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 655-678, January.
    2. Marcin Janusz & Marcin Kowalczyk, 2022. "How Smart Are V4 Cities? Evidence from the Multidimensional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Nadia Pintossi & Gamze Dane, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Driving Factors and Policy Enablers of Heritage Adaptive Reuse within the Circular Economy Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Andreea Ileana Zamfir, 2011. "Management Of Renewable Energy And Regional Development: European Experiences And Steps Forward," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(3), pages 35-42, August.
    5. Fan Zeng & Chris Kwan Yu Lo & Stacy Hyun Nam Lee, 2021. "Will Communication of Job Creation Facilitate Diffusion of Innovations in the Automobile Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Baltazar, Julien & Bouillass, Ghada & Vallet, Flore & Puchinger, Jakob & Perry, Nicolas, 2024. "Integrating environmental issues into the design of mobility plans: Insights from French practices," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1-14.
    7. Nadia Pintossi & Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Ana Pereira Roders, 2021. "Assessing Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Practices: Multi-Scale Challenges and Solutions in Rijeka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Jaroslaw Witkowski & Jakub Marcinkowski & Maja Kiba-Janiak, 2020. "A Comparative Analysis of Electronic Freight Exchanges in the United States and Europe with the Use of the Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Method “Promethee”," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 476-487.
    9. Magdalena Żak & Anna Mainka, 2020. "Cross-Regional Highway Built through a City Centre as an Example of the Sustainable Development of Urban Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Magruk Andrzej & Kononiuk Anna, 2024. "Role of the Copernicus Satellite Programme in Building the Resilience of European Supply Chains: Results of a Delphi Study," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 16(3), pages 29-40.
    11. B. N. Porfiryev & S. N. Bobylev, 2018. "Cities and Megalopolises: The Problem of Definitions and Sustainable Development Indicators," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 116-123, March.
    12. Pamučar, Dragan & Durán-Romero, Gemma & Yazdani, Morteza & López, Ana M., 2023. "A decision analysis model for smart mobility system development under circular economy approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. Claudiu Vasile Kifor & Niculina Alexandra Grigore, 2023. "Circular Economy Approaches for Electrical and Conventional Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, April.
    14. Cristina S. C. Calheiros & Alexandros I. Stefanakis, 2021. "Green Roofs Towards Circular and Resilient Cities," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 395-411, June.
    15. Rafał Nagaj, 2022. "Macroeconomic Policy versus Fuel Poverty in Poland—Support or Barrier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Teresa Cuerdo-Vilches & Miguel Ángel Navas-Martín & Ignacio Oteiza, 2021. "Behavior Patterns, Energy Consumption and Comfort during COVID-19 Lockdown Related to Home Features, Socioeconomic Factors and Energy Poverty in Madrid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Marta Postuła & Wojciech Chmielewski & Piotr Puczyński & Rafał Cieślik, 2021. "The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on Energy Poverty and Unemployment in Selected European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Henrique Sala Benites & Paul Osmond & Deo Prasad, 2022. "A Future-Proof Built Environment through Regenerative and Circular Lenses—Delphi Approach for Criteria Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-33, December.
    19. Uroš Kramar & Dejan Dragan & Darja Topolšek, 2019. "The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-29, November.
    20. Gülay Demir & Milanko Damjanović & Boško Matović & Radoje Vujadinović, 2022. "Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility by Using Fuzzy-FUCOM and Fuzzy-CoCoSo Methods: The Case of the SUMP Podgorica," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:10:p:2770-:d:552881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.