IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i5p1274-d505820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholders’ Analysis of Environmental Sustainability in Urban Logistics: A Case Study of Tricity, Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska

    (Department of Finance and Management, WSB University in Gdansk, Grunwaldzka 238a, 80-266 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Gdansk, Armii Krajowej 119/121, 81-824 Sopot, Poland)

Abstract

Environmental sustainability, defined as the responsibility to protect the global ecosystem in a holistic way, has become an integral factor of city strategies. Designing and implementing environment-friendly solutions to make the standard of living in cities better is indispensable for present and future generations. This article’s main objective is to identify the most environmentally friendly urban logistics measures from the perspective of urban transport system stakeholders. A multi-method approach was implemented to achieve the article’s main findings. Firstly, the literature review provided the basics for designing the research framework. Then, a three-layer methodological approach was used: The first layer included designing and carrying out the case study approach; the second layer comprised a Delphi study involving interviews with urban logistics stakeholders; and the third layer included analyzing the voices of Delphi interviewees to assess which urban logistics measures are the most important for them. The study provides an initial insight into the opinions of stakeholders for a general audience, but at the same time, also presents specific, detailed views of Tricity urban space users and decision-makers. Significant differences in opinions were observed and confirmed in the interviewed group. This study can contribute to the scientific discussion about the stakeholders’ analysis of urban logistics goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2021. "Stakeholders’ Analysis of Environmental Sustainability in Urban Logistics: A Case Study of Tricity, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:1274-:d:505820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1274/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1274/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles A. S. Hall & Stephen Balogh & David J.R. Murphy, 2009. "What is the Minimum EROI that a Sustainable Society Must Have?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Griffiths, Andrew, 2010. "Corporate sustainability and organizational culture," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 357-366, October.
    3. Alho, André Romano & de Abreu e Silva, João, 2015. "Utilizing urban form characteristics in urban logistics analysis: a case study in Lisbon, Portugal," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 57-71.
    4. Stathopoulos, Amanda & Valeri, Eva & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2012. "Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 34-45.
    5. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    6. Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Nicoletta Ricciardi & Giovanni Storchi, 2009. "Models for Evaluating and Planning City Logistics Systems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 432-454, November.
    7. Niklas Arvidsson & Michael Browne, 2013. "A review of the success and failure of tram systems to carry urban freight: the implications for a low emission intermodal solution using electric vehicles on trams," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 54, pages 1-5.
    8. Ko, Joonho & Lee, Sugie & Byun, Miree, 2019. "Exploring factors associated with commute mode choice: An application of city-level general social survey data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 36-46.
    9. Valentina Carbone & Aurélien Rouquet & Christine Roussat, 2017. "The Rise of Crowd Logistics: A New Way to Co‐Create Logistics Value," Post-Print hal-03118967, HAL.
    10. Romanika Okraszewska & Aleksandra Romanowska & Marcin Wołek & Jacek Oskarbski & Krystian Birr & Kazimierz Jamroz, 2018. "Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Magali Delmas & Michael W. Toffel, 2004. "Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 209-222, July.
    12. Marcin Wołek & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz & Marcin Koniak & Anna Golejewska, 2020. "Transformation of Trolleybus Transport in Poland. Does In-Motion Charging (Technology) Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-25, November.
    13. Romanika Okraszewska & Kazimierz Jamroz & Lech Michalski & Joanna Żukowska & Krzysztof Grzelec & Krystian Birr, 2019. "Analysing Ways to Achieve a New Urban Agenda-Based Sustainable Metropolitan Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Hopkins, Debbie, 2016. "Can environmental awareness explain declining preference for car-based mobility amongst generation Y? A qualitative examination of learn to drive behaviours," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 149-163.
    15. Koç, Çağrı & Bektaş, Tolga & Jabali, Ola & Laporte, Gilbert, 2016. "The impact of depot location, fleet composition and routing on emissions in city logistics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 81-102.
    16. Ivana Semanjski & Sidharta Gautama, 2019. "A Collaborative Stakeholder Decision-Making Approach for Sustainable Urban Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
    17. Spickermann, Alexander & Grienitz, Volker & von der Gracht, Heiko A., 2014. "Heading towards a multimodal city of the future?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 201-221.
    18. Melo, Sandra & Macedo, Joaquim & Baptista, Patrícia, 2019. "Capacity-sharing in logistics solutions: A new pathway towards sustainability," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 143-151.
    19. Ton Dassen & Eva Kunseler & Lieke Michiels Kessenich, 2013. "The Sustainable City: An Analytical–Deliberative Approach to Assess Policy in the Context of Sustainable Urban Development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(3), pages 193-205, May.
    20. Daniel Kaszubowski & Filip Heleniak, 2017. "A Concept of Freight Traffic Flow Regulations in the City of Gdansk," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Michał Suchanek (ed.), Sustainable Transport Development, Innovation and Technology, pages 57-71, Springer.
    21. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Jean-Louis Routhier & Frédéric Semet, 2014. "Sustainable urban logistics: Concepts, methods and information systems," Post-Print halshs-01056156, HAL.
    22. Bruzzone, Francesco & Cavallaro, Federico & Nocera, Silvio, 2021. "The integration of passenger and freight transport for first-last mile operations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 31-48.
    23. Vakulenko, Yulia & Hellström, Daniel & Hjort, Klas, 2018. "What's in the parcel locker? Exploring customer value in e-commerce last mile delivery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 421-427.
    24. David Hensher & Sean Puckett, 2005. "Refocusing the Modelling of Freight Distribution: Development of an Economic-Based Framework to Evaluate Supply Chain Behaviour in Response to Congestion Charging," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 573-602, November.
    25. Eléonora Morganti & Laetitia Dablanc & François Fortin, 2014. "Final deliveries for online shopping: the deployment of pickup point networks in urban and suburban areas," Post-Print hal-01067223, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sapan Tiwari & Neema Nassir & Patricia Sauri Lavieri, 2024. "Review and Classification of Objectives in Dynamic Dial-a-Ride Systems: A Triple Bottom Line Approach of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Edyta Przybylska & Marzena Kramarz & Katarzyna Dohn, 2023. "The Role of Stakeholders in Creating Mobility in Logistics Systems of Polish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Piotr Przybyłowski & Adam Przybyłowski & Agnieszka Kałaska, 2021. "Utility Method as an Instrument of the Quality of Life Assessment Using the Examples of Selected European Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2020. "Environmental Sustainability in City Logistics Measures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2019. "Assessment of the Crowd Logistics Solutions—The Stakeholders’ Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz & Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska, 2019. "Priorities of Urban Transport System Stakeholders According to Crowd Logistics Solutions in City Areas. A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Shi, Wenming & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "Shoppers’ logistics activities in omni-channel retailing: A conceptualisation and an exploration on perceptual differences in effort valuation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 195-208.
    5. Cleophas, Catherine & Cottrill, Caitlin & Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Tierney, Kevin, 2019. "Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 801-816.
    6. Michał Suchanek & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2019. "Environmental Aspects of Generation Y’s Sustainable Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Giulio Mangano & Giovanni Zenezini & Anna Corinna Cagliano, 2021. "Value Proposition for Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery. A Retailer Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Wanjie Hu & Jianjun Dong & Bon-gang Hwang & Rui Ren & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "A Scientometrics Review on City Logistics Literature: Research Trends, Advanced Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    9. Regal, Andrés & Gonzalez-Feliu, Jesús & Rodriguez, Michelle, 2023. "A spatio-functional logistics profile clustering analysis method for metropolitan areas," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Marta Viu-Roig & Eduard J. Alvarez-Palau, 2020. "The Impact of E-Commerce-Related Last-Mile Logistics on Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Letnik, Tomislav & Marksel, Maršenka & Luppino, Giuseppe & Bardi, Andrea & Božičnik, Stane, 2018. "Review of policies and measures for sustainable and energy efficient urban transport," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 245-257.
    12. Milioti, Christina & Pramatari, Katerina & Kelepouri, Ioanna, 2020. "Modelling consumers’ acceptance for the click and collect service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    13. Lin, Yun Hui & Wang, Yuan & He, Dongdong & Lee, Loo Hay, 2020. "Last-mile delivery: Optimal locker location under multinomial logit choice model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    14. Mommens, Koen & Buldeo Rai, Heleen & van Lier, Tom & Macharis, Cathy, 2021. "Delivery to homes or collection points? A sustainability analysis for urban, urbanised and rural areas in Belgium," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. Matthias Winkenbach & Alain Roset & Stefan Spinler, 2016. "Strategic Redesign of Urban Mail and Parcel Networks at La Poste," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 445-458, October.
    16. He, Dongdong & Guan, Wei, 2023. "Promoting service quality with incentive contracts in rural bus integrated passenger-freight service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    17. Zhu, Stuart X. & Ursavas, Evrim, 2018. "Design and analysis of a satellite network with direct delivery in the pharmaceutical industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 190-207.
    18. Tricoire, Fabien & Parragh, Sophie N., 2017. "Investing in logistics facilities today to reduce routing emissions tomorrow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 56-67.
    19. Daniel Kaszubowski, 2019. "A Method for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Transport Models as a Tool for Improving the Delivery of Sustainable Urban Transport Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.
    20. Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Carla de Oliveira Leite Nascimento & Paulo Renato de Sousa & Paulo Tarso Vilela de Resende & Francisco Gildemir Ferreira da Silva, 2019. "Transport Service Provider Perception of Barriers and Urban Freight Policies in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:1274-:d:505820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.