IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i6p1384-d333221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco-Efficiency Assessment of the Application of Large-Scale Rechargeable Batteries in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Krawczyk

    (Department of Energy Saving and Air Protection, Central Mining Institute, Pl. Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Anna Śliwińska

    (Department of Energy Saving and Air Protection, Central Mining Institute, Pl. Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

This article presents the results of an eco-efficiency assessment of the application of large-scale rechargeable battery technology in electricity generation from coal. The eco-efficiency of electricity production in a 350 MW coal-fired power plant was calculated. Two production variants were compared: with the use of a lithium-ion battery of a 400 MWh capacity to optimize the operation of power blocks and without using the battery. Hard coal is one of the main fossil fuels used to generate electricity in Poland. Despite the growing share of electricity from renewable sources, this situation will persist for many more years. The main reasons for this are the high costs and long-lasting process of moving away from fossil fuels in the energy sector. Therefore, any technical solutions that can temporarily reduce the negative impact of coal-based power engineering on the environment should be considered. At the same time, the economic aspects of such solutions must be taken into account. That is why the eco-efficiency assessment method was chosen, which integrates economic and environmental aspects. The obtained results of the analyses indicate the occurrence of environmental and economic benefits resulting from the use of the battery in coal-fired power plants. It has been found that battery-based technology is more eco-efficient than technology without such a battery. A sensitivity analysis was carried out, which allowed the impact of individual computational variables on the eco-efficiency assessment result to be assessed. The results indicate that fuel prices (coal and heavy fuel oil—mazout) and CO 2 emission allowances have the greatest impact on the eco-efficiency of the analyzed technology. It was also found that the factors related to the battery, such as its efficiency, life span, decrease of the capacity after 10 years of operation, and construction cost, have a much smaller impact on the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Krawczyk & Anna Śliwińska, 2020. "Eco-Efficiency Assessment of the Application of Large-Scale Rechargeable Batteries in a Coal-Fired Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1384-:d:333221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1384/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1384/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krawczyk, Piotr & Howaniec, Natalia & Smoliński, Adam, 2016. "Economic efficiency analysis of substitute natural gas (SNG) production in steam gasification of coal with the utilization of HTR excess heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1207-1213.
    2. Aleksandra Koteras & Jarosław Chećko & Tomasz Urych & Małgorzata Magdziarczyk & Adam Smolinski, 2020. "An Assessment of the Formations and Structures Suitable for Safe CO 2 Geological Storage in the Upper Silesia Coal Basin in Poland in the Context of the Regulation Relating to the CCS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Jarosław Chećko & Tomasz Urych & Małgorzata Magdziarczyk & Adam Smolinski, 2020. "Research on the Processes of Injecting CO 2 into Coal Seams with CH 4 Recovery Using Horizontal Wells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Peters, Jens F. & Baumann, Manuel & Zimmermann, Benedikt & Braun, Jessica & Weil, Marcel, 2017. "The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 491-506.
    5. Yu Miao & Patrick Hynan & Annette von Jouanne & Alexandre Yokochi, 2019. "Current Li-Ion Battery Technologies in Electric Vehicles and Opportunities for Advancements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Terlouw, Tom & AlSkaif, Tarek & Bauer, Christian & van Sark, Wilfried, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of energy arbitrage in community energy storage systems using different battery technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 356-372.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria M. Symeonidou & Effrosyni Giama & Agis M. Papadopoulos, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment for Supporting Dimensioning Battery Storage Systems in Micro-Grids for Residential Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Adam Smoliński & Andrzej Bąk, 2022. "Clean Coal Technologies as an Effective Way in Global Carbon Dioxide Mitigation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-4, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Desreveaux, A. & Bouscayrol, A. & Trigui, R. & Hittinger, E. & Castex, E. & Sirbu, G.M., 2023. "Accurate energy consumption for comparison of climate change impact of thermal and electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    2. Foad H. Gandoman & Emad M. Ahmed & Ziad M. Ali & Maitane Berecibar & Ahmed F. Zobaa & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem, 2021. "Reliability Evaluation of Lithium-Ion Batteries for E-Mobility Applications from Practical and Technical Perspectives: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Gönül, Ömer & Duman, A. Can & Güler, Önder, 2021. "Electric vehicles and charging infrastructure in Turkey: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Anna Śliwińska & Aleksandra Strugała-Wilczek & Piotr Krawczyk & Agnieszka Leśniak & Tomasz Urych & Jarosław Chećko & Krzysztof Stańczyk, 2022. "Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage Technology Development in a Region with High CO 2 Emissions and Low Storage Potential—A Case Study of Upper Silesia in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Silje Nornes Bryntesen & Anders Hammer Strømman & Ignat Tolstorebrov & Paul R. Shearing & Jacob J. Lamb & Odne Stokke Burheim, 2021. "Opportunities for the State-of-the-Art Production of LIB Electrodes—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-41, March.
    6. Terlouw, Tom & AlSkaif, Tarek & Bauer, Christian & van Sark, Wilfried, 2019. "Optimal energy management in all-electric residential energy systems with heat and electricity storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    7. Anisa Surya Wijareni & Hendri Widiyandari & Agus Purwanto & Aditya Farhan Arif & Mohammad Zaki Mubarok, 2022. "Morphology and Particle Size of a Synthesized NMC 811 Cathode Precursor with Mixed Hydroxide Precipitate and Nickel Sulfate as Nickel Sources and Comparison of Their Electrochemical Performances in an," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Alexandru Ciocan & Cosmin Ungureanu & Alin Chitu & Elena Carcadea & George Darie, 2020. "Electrical Longboard for Everyday Urban Commuting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Zhang, Yijie & Ma, Tao & Elia Campana, Pietro & Yamaguchi, Yohei & Dai, Yanjun, 2020. "A techno-economic sizing method for grid-connected household photovoltaic battery systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    10. Tao Xu & He Meng & Jie Zhu & Wei Wei & He Zhao & Han Yang & Zijin Li & Yuhan Wu, 2021. "Optimal Capacity Allocation of Energy Storage in Distribution Networks Considering Active/Reactive Coordination," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    11. Mattia Rapa & Laura Gobbi & Roberto Ruggieri, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Electric Vehicles: Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing Evaluation of Electricity Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    12. AlSkaif, Tarek & Dev, Soumyabrata & Visser, Lennard & Hossari, Murhaf & van Sark, Wilfried, 2020. "A systematic analysis of meteorological variables for PV output power estimation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 12-22.
    13. Cox, Brian & Bauer, Christian & Mendoza Beltran, Angelica & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Mutel, Christopher L., 2020. "Life cycle environmental and cost comparison of current and future passenger cars under different energy scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    14. D'Adamo, Idiano & Gastaldi, Massimo & Morone, Piergiuseppe & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2022. "Economics and policy implications of residential photovoltaic systems in Italy's developed market," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Gharehghani, Ayat & Rabiei, Moeed & Mehranfar, Sadegh & Saeedipour, Soheil & Mahmoudzadeh Andwari, Amin & García, Antonio & Reche, Carlos Mico, 2024. "Progress in battery thermal management systems technologies for electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    16. Lybbert, M. & Ghaemi, Z. & Balaji, A.K. & Warren, R., 2021. "Integrating life cycle assessment and electrochemical modeling to study the effects of cell design and operating conditions on the environmental impacts of lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    17. Keck, Felix & Jütte, Silke & Lenzen, Manfred & Li, Mengyu, 2022. "Assessment of two optimisation methods for renewable energy capacity expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    18. Ringkjøb, Hans-Kristian & Haugan, Peter M. & Nybø, Astrid, 2020. "Transitioning remote Arctic settlements to renewable energy systems – A modelling study of Longyearbyen, Svalbard," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    19. Smoliński, Adam & Howaniec, Natalia, 2023. "Experimental investigation and chemometric analysis of gasification and co-gasification of olive pomace and Sida Hermaphrodita blends with sewage sludge to hydrogen-rich gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    20. Bayer, Daniel R. & Pruckner, Marco, 2024. "Data-driven heat pump retrofit analysis in residential buildings: Carbon emission reductions and economic viability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1384-:d:333221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.