IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i21p5771-d439829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Impacts of the Demand Response of Electric Vehicles Considering Battery Degradation

Author

Listed:
  • Yumiko Iwafune

    (Energy System Integration Social Cooperation Program, Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan)

  • Kazuhiko Ogimoto

    (Energy System Integration Social Cooperation Program, Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan)

Abstract

The increase in the number of electric vehicles (EVs) has led to increased global expectations that the application of this technology may result in the reduction of CO 2 emissions through the replacement of conventional petrol vehicles and ensure the flexibility of power systems such as batteries. In this paper, we propose a residential demand response (DR) evaluation model that considers the degradation mechanism of the EV battery and examines the effective battery operation. We adopted the already-proposed NiMnCo battery degradation model to develop an EV DR evaluation model. In this model, the battery operation is optimized to minimize the electricity and degradation costs affected by ambient temperature, battery state of charge (SOC), and depth of discharge. In this study, we evaluated the impact of the relevant parameters on the economics of the DR of EV batteries for 10 all-electric detached houses with photovoltaic system assuming multiple EV driving patterns and battery (dis)charging constraints. The results indicated that the degradation costs are greatly affected by the SOC condition. If a low SOC can be managed with a DR strategy, the total cost can be reduced. This is because the sum of the reduction of purchased cost from the utility and calendar degradation costs are higher than the increase of the cycle degradation cost. In addition, an analysis was conducted considering different driving patterns. The results showed that the cost reduction was highest when a driving pattern was employed in which the mileage was low and the staying at home time was large. When degradation costs are included, the value of optimized charging and discharging operations is more apparent than when degradation costs are not considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Yumiko Iwafune & Kazuhiko Ogimoto, 2020. "Economic Impacts of the Demand Response of Electric Vehicles Considering Battery Degradation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5771-:d:439829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uddin, Kotub & Dubarry, Matthieu & Glick, Mark B., 2018. "The viability of vehicle-to-grid operations from a battery technology and policy perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 342-347.
    2. Das, Ridoy & Wang, Yue & Putrus, Ghanim & Kotter, Richard & Marzband, Mousa & Herteleer, Bert & Warmerdam, Jos, 2020. "Multi-objective techno-economic-environmental optimisation of electric vehicle for energy services," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    3. Yumiko Iwafune & Kazuhiko Ogimoto & Hitoshi Azuma, 2019. "Integration of Electric Vehicles into the Electric Power System Based on Results of Road Traffic Census," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Marongiu, Andrea & Roscher, Marco & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2015. "Influence of the vehicle-to-grid strategy on the aging behavior of lithium battery electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 899-912.
    5. Uddin, Kotub & Jackson, Tim & Widanage, Widanalage D. & Chouchelamane, Gael & Jennings, Paul A. & Marco, James, 2017. "On the possibility of extending the lifetime of lithium-ion batteries through optimal V2G facilitated by an integrated vehicle and smart-grid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 710-722.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Borge-Diez & Pedro Miguel Ortega-Cabezas & Antonio Colmenar-Santos & Jorge Juan Blanes-Peiró, 2021. "Contribution of Driving Efficiency to Vehicle-to-Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Higashitani, Takuya & Ikegami, Takashi & Akisawa, Atsushi, 2024. "Optimization of residential energy system configurations considering the bidirectional power supply of electric vehicles and electricity interchange between two residences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    3. Andre Leippi & Markus Fleschutz & Michael D. Murphy, 2022. "A Review of EV Battery Utilization in Demand Response Considering Battery Degradation in Non-Residential Vehicle-to-Grid Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Baure & Matthieu Dubarry, 2020. "Durability and Reliability of EV Batteries under Electric Utility Grid Operations: Impact of Frequency Regulation Usage on Cell Degradation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Ruben Garruto & Michela Longo & Wahiba Yaïci & Federica Foiadelli, 2020. "Connecting Parking Facilities to the Electric Grid: A Vehicle-to-Grid Feasibility Study in a Railway Station’s Car Park," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Andre Leippi & Markus Fleschutz & Michael D. Murphy, 2022. "A Review of EV Battery Utilization in Demand Response Considering Battery Degradation in Non-Residential Vehicle-to-Grid Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Mathieu, Romain & Baghdadi, Issam & Briat, Olivier & Gyan, Philippe & Vinassa, Jean-Michel, 2017. "D-optimal design of experiments applied to lithium battery for ageing model calibration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2108-2119.
    5. Haupt, Leon & Schöpf, Michael & Wederhake, Lars & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2020. "The influence of electric vehicle charging strategies on the sizing of electrical energy storage systems in charging hub microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    6. Thompson, Andrew W. & Perez, Yannick, 2020. "Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) energy services, value streams, and regulatory policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Earl, James & Fell, Michael J., 2019. "Electric vehicle manufacturers' perceptions of the market potential for demand-side flexibility using electric vehicles in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 646-652.
    8. Stef Proost & Mads Greaker & Cathrine Hagem, 2019. "Vehicle-to-Grid. Impacts on the electricity market and consumer cost of electric vehicles," Discussion Papers 903, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    9. Gaizka Saldaña & Jose Ignacio San Martin & Inmaculada Zamora & Francisco Javier Asensio & Oier Oñederra, 2019. "Electric Vehicle into the Grid: Charging Methodologies Aimed at Providing Ancillary Services Considering Battery Degradation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-37, June.
    10. Jungho Lim & Sung-Eun Lee & Kwang-Yong Park & Hee-Soo Kim & Jin-Hyeok Choi, 2021. "VxG Pattern-Based Analysis and Battery Deterioration Diagnosis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-12, August.
    11. Uddin, Kotub & Dubarry, Matthieu & Glick, Mark B., 2018. "The viability of vehicle-to-grid operations from a battery technology and policy perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 342-347.
    12. Huang, Bing & Meijssen, Aart Gerard & Annema, Jan Anne & Lukszo, Zofia, 2021. "Are electric vehicle drivers willing to participate in vehicle-to-grid contracts? A context-dependent stated choice experiment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    13. Nnaemeka Vincent Emodi & Scott Dwyer & Kriti Nagrath & John Alabi, 2022. "Electromobility in Australia: Tariff Design Structure and Consumer Preferences for Mobile Distributed Energy Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Shipman, Rob & Roberts, Rebecca & Waldron, Julie & Naylor, Sophie & Pinchin, James & Rodrigues, Lucelia & Gillott, Mark, 2021. "We got the power: Predicting available capacity for vehicle-to-grid services using a deep recurrent neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Gschwendtner, Christine & Sinsel, Simon R. & Stephan, Annegret, 2021. "Vehicle-to-X (V2X) implementation: An overview of predominate trial configurations and technical, social and regulatory challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2024. "Role of smart charging of electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid in integrated renewables-based energy systems on country level," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    17. Ghorbanzadeh, Milad & Astaneh, Majid & Golzar, Farzin, 2019. "Long-term degradation based analysis for lithium-ion batteries in off-grid wind-battery renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1194-1206.
    18. Petit, Martin & Prada, Eric & Sauvant-Moynot, Valérie, 2016. "Development of an empirical aging model for Li-ion batteries and application to assess the impact of Vehicle-to-Grid strategies on battery lifetime," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 398-407.
    19. Loris Di Natale & Luca Funk & Martin Rüdisüli & Bratislav Svetozarevic & Giacomo Pareschi & Philipp Heer & Giovanni Sansavini, 2021. "The Potential of Vehicle-to-Grid to Support the Energy Transition: A Case Study on Switzerland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Yossi Hadad & Baruch Keren & Dima Alberg, 2023. "An Expert System for Ranking and Matching Electric Vehicles to Customer Specifications and Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5771-:d:439829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.