IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i20p5468-d431420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization Design of Rib Width and Performance Analysis of Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell

Author

Listed:
  • Meiting Guo

    (Department of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 96, JinZhai Road, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Xiao Ru

    (Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 96, JinZhai Road, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Zijing Lin

    (Department of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 96, JinZhai Road, Hefei 230026, China
    Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 96, JinZhai Road, Hefei 230026, China
    CAS Key Laboratory of Strongly-Coupled Quantum Matter Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 96, JinZhai Road, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Guoping Xiao

    (Key Laboratory of Interfacial Physics and Technology, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China)

  • Jianqiang Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Interfacial Physics and Technology, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China)

Abstract

Structure design is of great value for the performance improvement of solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) to diminish the gap between scientific research and industrial application. A comprehensive multi-physics coupled model is constructed to conduct parameter sensitivity analysis to reveal the primary and secondary factors on the SOEC performance and optimal rib width. It is found that the parameters of the O 2 electrode have almost no influence on the optimal rib width at the H 2 electrode side and vice versa. The optimized rib width is not sensitive to the electrode porosity, thickness, electrical conductivity and gas composition. The optimal rib width at the H 2 electrode side is sensitive to the contact resistance at the interface between the electrode and interconnect rib, while the extremely small concentration loss at the O 2 electrode leads to the insensitivity of optimal rib width to the parameters influencing the O 2 diffusion. In addition to the contact resistance, the applied cell voltage and pitch width also has a dramatic influence on the optimal rib width of the fuel electrode. An analytical expression considering the influence of total cell polarization loss, the pitch width and the contact resistance is further developed for the benefit of the engineering society. The maximum error in the cell performance between the numerically obtained and analytically acquired optimal rib width is only 0.14% and the predictive power of the analytical formula is fully verified.

Suggested Citation

  • Meiting Guo & Xiao Ru & Zijing Lin & Guoping Xiao & Jianqiang Wang, 2020. "Optimization Design of Rib Width and Performance Analysis of Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5468-:d:431420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5468/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5468/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Kong & Xiang Gao & Shixue Liu & Shichuan Su & Daifen Chen, 2014. "Optimization of the Interconnect Ribs for a Cathode-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Shixue Liu & Wei Kong & Zijing Lin, 2009. "A Microscale Modeling Tool for the Design and Optimization of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Baldinelli, Arianna & Barelli, Linda & Bidini, Gianni, 2015. "Performance characterization and modelling of syngas-fed SOFCs (solid oxide fuel cells) varying fuel composition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 2070-2084.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng Li & Guogang Yang & Qiuwan Shen & Shian Li & Hao Wang & Jiadong Liao & Ziheng Jiang & Guoling Zhang, 2022. "Transient Multi-Physics Modeling and Performance Degradation Evaluation of Direct Internal Reforming Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Focusing on Carbon Deposition Effect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Shangzhe Yu & Shidong Zhang & Dominik Schäfer & Roland Peters & Felix Kunz & Rüdiger-A. Eichel, 2023. "Numerical Modeling and Simulation of the Solid Oxide Cell Stacks and Metal Interconnect Oxidation with OpenFOAM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jee Min Park & Dae Yun Kim & Jong Dae Baek & Yong-Jin Yoon & Pei-Chen Su & Seong Hyuk Lee, 2018. "Effect of Electrolyte Thickness on Electrochemical Reactions and Thermo-Fluidic Characteristics inside a SOFC Unit Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Jeon, Dong Hyup, 2019. "Computational fluid dynamics simulation of anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells with implementing complete overpotential model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Wei Kong & Xiang Gao & Shixue Liu & Shichuan Su & Daifen Chen, 2014. "Optimization of the Interconnect Ribs for a Cathode-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Ebrahim Farjah & Mosayeb Bornapour & Taher Niknam & Bahman Bahmanifirouzi, 2012. "Placement of Combined Heat, Power and Hydrogen Production Fuel Cell Power Plants in a Distribution Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Ramadhani, F. & Hussain, M.A. & Mokhlis, H. & Hajimolana, S., 2017. "Optimization strategies for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) application: A literature survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 460-484.
    6. Fu, Quanrong & Tian, Chunyu & Hun, Lianming & Wang, Xin & Li, Zhiyi & Liu, Zhijun & Wei, Wei, 2024. "Ni agglomeration and performance degradation of solid oxide fuel cell: A model-based quantitative study and microstructure optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    7. Dang, Zheng & Xu, Han, 2016. "Pore scale investigation of gaseous mixture flow in porous anode of solid oxide fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 295-304.
    8. Habibollahzade, Ali & Rosen, Marc A., 2021. "Syngas-fueled solid oxide fuel cell functionality improvement through appropriate feedstock selection and multi-criteria optimization using Air/O2-enriched-air gasification agents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    9. Pongratz, G. & Subotić, V. & Schroettner, H. & Hochenauer, C. & Skrzypkiewicz, M. & Kupecki, Jakub & Anca-Couce, A. & Scharler, R., 2021. "Analysis of H2S-related short-term degradation and regeneration of anode- and electrolyte supported solid oxide fuel cells fueled with biomass steam gasifier product gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    10. Jienkulsawad, Prathak & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2016. "Investigating the performance of a solid oxide fuel cell and a molten carbonate fuel cell combined system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 843-853.
    11. Pongratz, Gernot & Subotić, Vanja & Hochenauer, Christoph & Scharler, Robert & Anca-Couce, Andrés, 2022. "Solid oxide fuel cell operation with biomass gasification product gases: Performance- and carbon deposition risk evaluation via a CFD modelling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    12. Min Yan & Pei Fu & Qiuyang Chen & Qiuwang Wang & Min Zeng & Jaideep Pandit, 2014. "Electrical Performance and Carbon Deposition Differences between the Bi-Layer Interconnector and Conventional Straight Interconnector Solid Oxide Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Chatrattanawet, Narissara & Saebea, Dang & Authayanun, Suthida & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn, 2018. "Performance and environmental study of a biogas-fuelled solid oxide fuel cell with different reforming approaches," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 131-140.
    14. Rashid, Kashif & Dong, Sang Keun & Mehran, Muhammad Taqi, 2017. "Numerical investigations to determine the optimal operating conditions for 1 kW-class flat-tubular solid oxide fuel cell stack," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 673-691.
    15. Cavalli, A. & Fernandes, A. & Aravind, P.V., 2021. "Thermodynamic analysis of an improved integrated biomass gasifier solid oxide fuel cell micro combined heat and power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    16. Subotić, Vanja & Baldinelli, Arianna & Barelli, Linda & Scharler, Robert & Pongratz, Gernot & Hochenauer, Christoph & Anca-Couce, Andrés, 2019. "Applicability of the SOFC technology for coupling with biomass-gasifier systems: Short- and long-term experimental study on SOFC performance and degradation behaviour," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    17. Wei Kong & Qiang Zhang & Xiuwen Xu & Daifen Chen, 2015. "A Simple Expression for the Tortuosity of Gas Transport Paths in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells’ Porous Electrodes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-7, December.
    18. Abedinia, Oveis & Shakibi, Hamid & Shokri, Afshar & Sobhani, Behnam & Sobhani, Behrouz & Yari, Mortaza & Bagheri, Mehdi, 2024. "Optimization of a syngas-fueled SOFC-based multigeneration system: Enhanced performance with biomass and gasification agent selection," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Jianguo Zhao & Zihan Lin & Mingjue Zhou, 2022. "Three-Dimensional Modeling and Performance Study of High Temperature Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell with Metal Foam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Yongqing Wang & Bo An & Ke Wang & Yan Cao & Fan Gao, 2020. "Identification of Restricting Parameters on Steps toward the Intermediate-Temperature Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5468-:d:431420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.