IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i16p4085-d395622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Battery Models for Battery Powered Applications: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola Campagna

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy)

  • Vincenzo Castiglia

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy)

  • Rosario Miceli

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy)

  • Rosa Anna Mastromauro

    (Department of Information Engineering (DINFO), University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy)

  • Ciro Spataro

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy)

  • Marco Trapanese

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy)

  • Fabio Viola

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

Battery models have gained great importance in recent years, thanks to the increasingly massive penetration of electric vehicles in the transport market. Accurate battery models are needed to evaluate battery performances and design an efficient battery management system. Different modeling approaches are available in literature, each one with its own advantages and disadvantages. In general, more complex models give accurate results, at the cost of higher computational efforts and time-consuming and costly laboratory testing for parametrization. For these reasons, for early stage evaluation and design of battery management systems, models with simple parameter identification procedures are the most appropriate and feasible solutions. In this article, three different battery modeling approaches are considered, and their parameters’ identification are described. Two of the chosen models require no laboratory tests for parametrization, and most of the information are derived from the manufacturer’s datasheet, while the last battery model requires some laboratory assessments. The models are then validated at steady state, comparing the simulation results with the datasheet discharge curves, and in transient operation, comparing the simulation results with experimental results. The three modeling and parametrization approaches are systematically applied to the LG 18650HG2 lithium-ion cell, and results are presented, compared and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola Campagna & Vincenzo Castiglia & Rosario Miceli & Rosa Anna Mastromauro & Ciro Spataro & Marco Trapanese & Fabio Viola, 2020. "Battery Models for Battery Powered Applications: A Comparative Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:16:p:4085-:d:395622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/16/4085/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/16/4085/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dian Wang & Yun Bao & Jianjun Shi, 2017. "Online Lithium-Ion Battery Internal Resistance Measurement Application in State-of-Charge Estimation Using the Extended Kalman Filter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Fotouhi, Abbas & Auger, Daniel J. & Propp, Karsten & Longo, Stefano & Wild, Mark, 2016. "A review on electric vehicle battery modelling: From Lithium-ion toward Lithium–Sulphur," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1008-1021.
    3. Huan Yang & Yubing Qiu & Xingpeng Guo, 2015. "Prediction of State-of-Health for Nickel-Metal Hydride Batteries by a Curve Model Based on Charge-Discharge Tests," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Alexandros Nikolian & Yousef Firouz & Rahul Gopalakrishnan & Jean-Marc Timmermans & Noshin Omar & Peter Van den Bossche & Joeri Van Mierlo, 2016. "Lithium Ion Batteries—Development of Advanced Electrical Equivalent Circuit Models for Nickel Manganese Cobalt Lithium-Ion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Thomas R. B. Grandjean & Andrew McGordon & Paul A. Jennings, 2017. "Structural Identifiability of Equivalent Circuit Models for Li-Ion Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Szymon Potrykus & Filip Kutt & Janusz Nieznański & Francisco Jesús Fernández Morales, 2020. "Advanced Lithium-Ion Battery Model for Power System Performance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Simone Barcellona & Luigi Piegari, 2017. "Lithium Ion Battery Models and Parameter Identification Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Alejandro Gismero & Erik Schaltz & Daniel-Ioan Stroe, 2020. "Recursive State of Charge and State of Health Estimation Method for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Coulomb Counting and Open Circuit Voltage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-11, April.
    9. Hongwen He & Hongzhou Qin & Xiaokun Sun & Yuanpeng Shui, 2013. "Comparison Study on the Battery SoC Estimation with EKF and UKF Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matteo Spiller & Giuliano Rancilio & Filippo Bovera & Giacomo Gorni & Stefano Mandelli & Federico Bresciani & Marco Merlo, 2023. "A Model-Aware Comprehensive Tool for Battery Energy Storage System Sizing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Pablo Carrasco Ortega & Pablo Durán Gómez & Julio César Mérida Sánchez & Fernando Echevarría Camarero & Ángel Á. Pardiñas, 2023. "Battery Energy Storage Systems for the New Electricity Market Landscape: Modeling, State Diagnostics, Management, and Viability—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-51, August.
    3. Umberto Previti & Sebastian Brusca & Antonio Galvagno & Fabio Famoso, 2022. "Influence of Energy Management System Control Strategies on the Battery State of Health in Hybrid Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Adam Deptuła & Andrzej Augustynowicz & Michał Stosiak & Krzysztof Towarnicki & Mykola Karpenko, 2022. "The Concept of Using an Expert System and Multi-Valued Logic Trees to Assess the Energy Consumption of an Electric Car in Selected Driving Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Li, Hai & Zheng, Peng & Zhang, Tingsheng & Zou, Yingquan & Pan, Yajia & Zhang, Zutao & Azam, Ali, 2021. "A high-efficiency energy regenerative shock absorber for powering auxiliary devices of new energy driverless buses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shrivastava, Prashant & Soon, Tey Kok & Idris, Mohd Yamani Idna Bin & Mekhilef, Saad, 2019. "Overview of model-based online state-of-charge estimation using Kalman filter family for lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Liang Zhang & Shunli Wang & Daniel-Ioan Stroe & Chuanyun Zou & Carlos Fernandez & Chunmei Yu, 2020. "An Accurate Time Constant Parameter Determination Method for the Varying Condition Equivalent Circuit Model of Lithium Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Hegazy Rezk & A. G. Olabi & Tabbi Wilberforce & Enas Taha Sayed, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review and Application of Metaheuristics in Solving the Optimal Parameter Identification Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Woo-Yong Kim & Pyeong-Yeon Lee & Jonghoon Kim & Kyung-Soo Kim, 2019. "A Nonlinear-Model-Based Observer for a State-of-Charge Estimation of a Lithium-Ion Battery in Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Yonghui Sun & Yi Wang & Linquan Bai & Yinlong Hu & Denis Sidorov & Daniil Panasetsky, 2018. "Parameter Estimation of Electromechanical Oscillation Based on a Constrained EKF with C&I-PSO," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. S. Tamilselvi & S. Gunasundari & N. Karuppiah & Abdul Razak RK & S. Madhusudan & Vikas Madhav Nagarajan & T. Sathish & Mohammed Zubair M. Shamim & C. Ahamed Saleel & Asif Afzal, 2021. "A Review on Battery Modelling Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-26, September.
    7. Gaizka Saldaña & José Ignacio San Martín & Inmaculada Zamora & Francisco Javier Asensio & Oier Oñederra, 2019. "Analysis of the Current Electric Battery Models for Electric Vehicle Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Jong-Hyun Lee & In-Soo Lee, 2021. "Lithium Battery SOH Monitoring and an SOC Estimation Algorithm Based on the SOH Result," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Taysa Millena Banik Marques & João Lucas Ferreira dos Santos & Diego Solak Castanho & Mariane Bigarelli Ferreira & Sergio L. Stevan & Carlos Henrique Illa Font & Thiago Antonini Alves & Cassiano Moro , 2023. "An Overview of Methods and Technologies for Estimating Battery State of Charge in Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Adrian Chmielewski & Jakub Możaryn & Piotr Piórkowski & Krzysztof Bogdziński, 2018. "Comparison of NARX and Dual Polarization Models for Estimation of the VRLA Battery Charging/Discharging Dynamics in Pulse Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, November.
    11. Angeles Cabañero, Maria & Altmann, Johannes & Gold, Lukas & Boaretto, Nicola & Müller, Jana & Hein, Simon & Zausch, Jochen & Kallo, Josef & Latz, Arnulf, 2019. "Investigation of the temperature dependence of lithium plating onset conditions in commercial Li-ion batteries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1217-1228.
    12. Yashraj Tripathy & Andrew McGordon & Anup Barai, 2020. "Improving Accessible Capacity Tracking at Low Ambient Temperatures for Range Estimation of Battery Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Luna, M. & Di Piazza, M.C. & La Tona, G. & Accetta, A. & Pucci, M., 2021. "Exploiting dynamic modeling, parameter identification, and power electronics to implement a non-dissipative Li-ion battery hardware emulator," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 48-65.
    14. Yun Bao & Yuansheng Chen, 2021. "Lithium-Ion Battery Real-Time Diagnosis with Direct Current Impedance Spectroscopy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Alexander Koch & Lorenzo Nicoletti & Thomas Herrmann & Markus Lienkamp, 2022. "Implementation and Analyses of an Eco-Driving Algorithm for Different Battery Electric Powertrain Topologies Based on a Split Loss Integration Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-29, July.
    16. Liqiang Zhang & Lixin Wang & Chao Lyu & Junfu Li & Jun Zheng, 2014. "Non-Destructive Analysis of Degradation Mechanisms in Cycle-Aged Graphite/LiCoO 2 Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Chen, Zheng & Zhao, Hongqian & Shu, Xing & Zhang, Yuanjian & Shen, Jiangwei & Liu, Yonggang, 2021. "Synthetic state of charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on long short-term memory network modeling and adaptive H-Infinity filter," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Shi You & Junjie Hu & Charalampos Ziras, 2016. "An Overview of Modeling Approaches Applied to Aggregation-Based Fleet Management and Integration of Plug-in Electric Vehicles †," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Tao, Laifa & Cheng, Yujie & Lu, Chen & Su, Yuzhuan & Chong, Jin & Jin, Haizu & Lin, Yongshou & Noktehdan, Azadeh, 2017. "Lithium-ion battery capacity fading dynamics modelling for formulation optimization: A stochastic approach to accelerate the design process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 138-152.
    20. Jan Engelhardt & Jan Martin Zepter & Tatiana Gabderakhmanova & Gunnar Rohde & Mattia Marinelli, 2021. "Double-String Battery System with Reconfigurable Cell Topology Operated as a Fast Charging Station for Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:16:p:4085-:d:395622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.