IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i14p3741-d387224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rapid Determination of Wood and Rice Husk Pellets’ Proximate Analysis and Heating Value

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodan Liu

    (College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Key Laboratory of Spectroscopy Sensing, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Xuping Feng

    (College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Key Laboratory of Spectroscopy Sensing, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Lingxia Huang

    (The Rural Development Academy, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Yong He

    (College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Key Laboratory of Spectroscopy Sensing, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310058, China
    State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation, College of Optical Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Biomass pellets are a potential renewable and clean energy source. With the advantages of perfect combustion performance and easy storage and transport, biomass pellets have gradually replaced fossil fuels and become widely used. Rapid and accurate determination of biomass pellets’ quality is critical to efficient energy use. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) combined with chemometric methods were utilized. The gross calorific value (CV) and ash content (Ash), volatile matter (VM) and fixed carbon (FC) were firstly measured and analyzed. LIBS spectra and their corresponding elements of biomass pellet samples were analyzed. Three quantitative analysis models for quality indexes including partial least-squares regression (PLSR), least squares-support vector machines (LS-SVM), extreme learning machines (ELM) were further built. All models performed well, especially the LS-SVM model which obtained the best determination results, with all R 2 values over 0.95. Concurrently, the modeling performance of ash was slightly better than that of the other three quality indexes, which further confirmed the feasibility of using relevant elements to predict biomass quality indexes. The overall results indicated that LIBS coupled with suitable chemometrics could be an alternative promising method to determine quality indexes of biomass pellets and further improve energy utilization by using biomass materials with better quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodan Liu & Xuping Feng & Lingxia Huang & Yong He, 2020. "Rapid Determination of Wood and Rice Husk Pellets’ Proximate Analysis and Heating Value," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:14:p:3741-:d:387224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/14/3741/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/14/3741/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parascanu, M.M. & Sandoval-Salas, F. & Soreanu, G. & Valverde, J.L. & Sanchez-Silva, L., 2017. "Valorization of Mexican biomasses through pyrolysis, combustion and gasification processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 509-522.
    2. Oladejo, Jumoke & Adegbite, Stephen & Gao, Xiang & Liu, Hao & Wu, Tao, 2018. "Catalytic and non-catalytic synergistic effects and their individual contributions to improved combustion performance of coal/biomass blends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 334-345.
    3. Gillespie, Gary D. & Everard, Colm D. & McDonnell, Kevin P., 2015. "Prediction of biomass pellet quality indices using near infrared spectroscopy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 582-588.
    4. Santos Dalólio, Felipe & da Silva, Jadir Nogueira & Carneiro de Oliveira, Angélica Cássia & Ferreira Tinôco, Ilda de Fátima & Christiam Barbosa, Rúben & Resende, Michael de Oliveira & Teixeira Albino,, 2017. "Poultry litter as biomass energy: A review and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 941-949.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erlina Yustanti & Endarto Yudo Wardhono & Anggoro Tri Mursito & Ali Alhamidi, 2021. "Types and Composition of Biomass in Biocoke Synthesis with the Coal Blending Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Wentao Li & Mingfeng Wang & Fanbin Meng & Yifei Zhang & Bo Zhang, 2022. "A Review on the Effects of Pretreatment and Process Parameters on Properties of Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Mohammad Hosseini Rahdar & Fuzhan Nasiri, 2020. "Operation Adaptation of Moving Bed Biomass Combustors under Various Waste Fuel Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sitka, Andrzej & Szulc, Piotr & Smykowski, Daniel & Jodkowski, Wiesław, 2021. "Application of poultry manure as an energy resource by its gasification in a prototype rotary counterflow gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 422-429.
    2. Rios-Del Toro, E. Emilia & Chi, Hetian & González-Álvarez, Víctor & Méndez-Acosta, Hugo O. & Arreola-Vargas, Jorge & Liu, Hao, 2021. "Coupling the biochemical and thermochemical biorefinery platforms to enhance energy and product recovery from Agave tequilana bagasse," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    3. Shi, Kaiqi & Oladejo, Jumoke Mojisola & Yan, Jiefeng & Wu, Tao, 2019. "Investigation on the interactions among lignocellulosic constituents and minerals of biomass and their influences on co-firing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 129-137.
    4. Kai Wang & Jianliang Zhang & Shengli Wu & Jianlong Wu & Kun Xu & Jiawen Liu & Xiaojun Ning & Guangwei Wang, 2022. "Feasibility Analysis of Biomass Hydrochar Blended Coal Injection for Blast Furnace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Liu, Xiaodan & Feng, Xuping & He, Yong, 2019. "Rapid discrimination of the categories of the biomass pellets using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 176-182.
    6. Daya Shankar Pandey & Giannis Katsaros & Christian Lindfors & James J. Leahy & Savvas A. Tassou, 2019. "Fast Pyrolysis of Poultry Litter in a Bubbling Fluidised Bed Reactor: Energy and Nutrient Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Parascanu, M.M. & Puig-Gamero, M. & Soreanu, G. & Valverde, J.L. & Sanchez-Silva, L., 2019. "Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Posom, Jetsada & Shrestha, Amrit & Saechua, Wanphut & Sirisomboon, Panmanas, 2016. "Rapid non-destructive evaluation of moisture content and higher heating value of Leucaena leucocephala pellets using near infrared spectroscopy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 464-472.
    9. Fuchs, Werner & Wang, Xuemei & Gabauer, Wolfgang & Ortner, Markus & Li, Zifu, 2018. "Tackling ammonia inhibition for efficient biogas production from chicken manure: Status and technical trends in Europe and China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 186-199.
    10. Mancini, M. & Rinnan, Å., 2021. "Near infrared technique as a tool for the rapid assessment of waste wood quality for energy applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 113-123.
    11. Tomasz Noszczyk & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Jacek A. Koziel, 2021. "Kinetic Parameters of Nut Shells Pyrolysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Ramos-Hernández, Rocío & Sánchez-Ramírez, Cuauhtémoc & Mota-López, Dulce Rocio & Sandoval-Salas, Fabiola & García-Alcaraz, Jorge Luis, 2021. "Evaluation of bioenergy potential from coffee pulp trough System Dynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 863-877.
    13. Šantl, Neža & Stergar, Janja & Bozicko, Matevz & Goričanec, Darko & Urbancl, Danijela & Petrovič, Aleksandra, 2024. "The utilisation of thermally treated poultry farm waste for energy recovery and soil application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Khalili, Maryam & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2018. "Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 869-887.
    15. Haleem, Noor & Khattak, Alishba & Jamal, Yousuf & Sajid, Masooma & Shahzad, Zainab & Raza, Hammad, 2022. "Development of poly vinyl alcohol (PVA) based biochar nanofibers for carbon dioxide (CO2) adsorption," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Marreiro, Hívila M.P. & Peruchi, Rogério S. & Lopes, Riuzuani M.B.P. & Rotella Junior, Paulo, 2024. "Briquetting process optimization of poultry litter and urban wood waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    17. Adnan, Muflih A. & Hossain, Mohammad M., 2018. "Gasification of various biomasses including microalgae using CO2 – A thermodynamic study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 598-607.
    18. Akifumi Ogino & Kazato Oishi & Akira Setoguchi & Takashi Osada, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainable Broiler Production Systems: Effects of Low-Protein Diet and Litter Incineration," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, September.
    19. Sirisomboon, Panmanas & Funke, Axel & Posom, Jetsada, 2020. "Improvement of proximate data and calorific value assessment of bamboo through near infrared wood chips acquisition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1921-1931.
    20. Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Kurnia, Jundika Candra & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2019. "Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 252-267.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:14:p:3741-:d:387224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.