IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i13p3454-d379967.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment of Classic and Innovative Batteries for Solar Home Systems in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Rossi

    (R2ES Lab, Department of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
    Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Florence, Italy)

  • Maria Laura Parisi

    (R2ES Lab, Department of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
    CSGI—Consortium for Colloid and Surface Science, via della Lastruccia 3, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy
    CNR-ICCOM, National Research Council—Institute for the Chemistry of OrganoMetallic Compounds, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy)

  • Sarah Greven

    (ENSICAEN, Chimie Materiaux, 6 bd Maréchal Juin—CS 45053, F-14050 Caen CEDEX 4, France)

  • Riccardo Basosi

    (R2ES Lab, Department of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
    CSGI—Consortium for Colloid and Surface Science, via della Lastruccia 3, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy
    CNR-ICCOM, National Research Council—Institute for the Chemistry of OrganoMetallic Compounds, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy)

  • Adalgisa Sinicropi

    (R2ES Lab, Department of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
    CSGI—Consortium for Colloid and Surface Science, via della Lastruccia 3, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy
    CNR-ICCOM, National Research Council—Institute for the Chemistry of OrganoMetallic Compounds, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy)

Abstract

This paper presents an environmental sustainability assessment of residential user-scale energy systems, named solar home systems, encompassing their construction, operation, and end of life. The methodology adopted is composed of three steps, namely a design phase, a simulation of the solar home systems’ performance and a life cycle assessment. The analysis aims to point out the main advantages, features, and challenges of lithium-ion batteries, considered as a benchmark, compared with other innovative devices. As the environmental sustainability of these systems is affected by the solar radiation intensity during the year, a sensitivity analysis is performed varying the latitude of the installation site in Europe. For each site, both isolated and grid-connected solar home systems have been compared considering also the national electricity mix. A general overview of the results shows that, regardless of the installation site, solid state nickel cobalt manganese and nickel cobalt aluminium lithium-ion batteries are the most suitable choices in terms of sustainability. Remarkably, other novel devices, like sodium-ion batteries, are already competitive with them and have great potential. With these batteries, the solar home systems’ eco-profile is generally advantageous compared to the energy mix, especially in on-grid configurations, with some exceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Rossi & Maria Laura Parisi & Sarah Greven & Riccardo Basosi & Adalgisa Sinicropi, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Classic and Innovative Batteries for Solar Home Systems in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3454-:d:379967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3454/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3454/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deng, Yelin & Li, Jianyang & Li, Tonghui & Zhang, Jingyi & Yang, Fan & Yuan, Chris, 2017. "Life cycle assessment of high capacity molybdenum disulfide lithium-ion battery for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 77-88.
    2. Wang, Richard & Lam, Chor-Man & Hsu, Shu-Chien & Chen, Jieh-Haur, 2019. "Life cycle assessment and energy payback time of a standalone hybrid renewable energy commercial microgrid: A case study of Town Island in Hong Kong," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 760-775.
    3. Troy, Stefanie & Schreiber, Andrea & Reppert, Thorsten & Gehrke, Hans-Gregor & Finsterbusch, Martin & Uhlenbruck, Sven & Stenzel, Peter, 2016. "Life Cycle Assessment and resource analysis of all-solid-state batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 757-767.
    4. Cardoso, Gonçalo & Brouhard, Thomas & DeForest, Nicholas & Wang, Dai & Heleno, Miguel & Kotzur, Leander, 2018. "Battery aging in multi-energy microgrid design using mixed integer linear programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1059-1069.
    5. Kabakian, V. & McManus, M.C. & Harajli, H., 2015. "Attributional life cycle assessment of mounted 1.8kWp monocrystalline photovoltaic system with batteries and comparison with fossil energy production system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 428-437.
    6. Fabio Bignucolo & Massimiliano Coppo & Giorgio Crugnola & Andrea Savio, 2017. "Application of a Simplified Thermal-Electric Model of a Sodium-Nickel Chloride Battery Energy Storage System to a Real Case Residential Prosumer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-29, September.
    7. Deidre Wolff & Lluc Canals Casals & Gabriela Benveniste & Cristina Corchero & Lluís Trilla, 2019. "The Effects of Lithium Sulfur Battery Ageing on Second-Life Possibilities and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Simone Maranghi & Maria Laura Parisi & Riccardo Basosi & Adalgisa Sinicropi, 2019. "Environmental Profile of the Manufacturing Process of Perovskite Photovoltaics: Harmonization of Life Cycle Assessment Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Quoilin, Sylvain & Kavvadias, Konstantinos & Mercier, Arnaud & Pappone, Irene & Zucker, Andreas, 2016. "Quantifying self-consumption linked to solar home battery systems: Statistical analysis and economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 58-67.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Jachura & Robert Sekret, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of the Use of Phase Change Material in an Evacuated Solar Tube Collector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Rossi, Federico & Heleno, Miguel & Basosi, Riccardo & Sinicropi, Adalgisa, 2021. "LCA driven solar compensation mechanism for Renewable Energy Communities: the Italian case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Kang, Hyuna & Jung, Seunghoon & Lee, Minhyun & Hong, Taehoon, 2022. "How to better share energy towards a carbon-neutral city? A review on application strategies of battery energy storage system in city," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chatzisideris, Marios D. & Ohms, Pernille K. & Espinosa, Nieves & Krebs, Frederik C. & Laurent, Alexis, 2019. "Economic and environmental performances of organic photovoltaics with battery storage for residential self-consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    2. Kourkoumpas, Dimitrios-Sotirios & Benekos, Georgios & Nikolopoulos, Nikolaos & Karellas, Sotirios & Grammelis, Panagiotis & Kakaras, Emmanouel, 2018. "A review of key environmental and energy performance indicators for the case of renewable energy systems when integrated with storage solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 380-398.
    3. Alexander Barke & Walter Cistjakov & Dominik Steckermeier & Christian Thies & Jan‐Linus Popien & Peter Michalowski & Sofia Pinheiro Melo & Felipe Cerdas & Christoph Herrmann & Ulrike Krewer & Arno Kwa, 2023. "Green batteries for clean skies: Sustainability assessment of lithium‐sulfur all‐solid‐state batteries for electric aircraft," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 795-810, June.
    4. Rossi, Federico & Heleno, Miguel & Basosi, Riccardo & Sinicropi, Adalgisa, 2021. "LCA driven solar compensation mechanism for Renewable Energy Communities: the Italian case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    5. Paul, Debashri & Pechancová, Viera & Saha, Nabanita & Pavelková, Drahomíra & Saha, Nibedita & Motiei, Marjan & Jamatia, Thaiskang & Chaudhuri, Mainak & Ivanichenko, Anna & Venher, Mariana & Hrbáčková,, 2024. "Life cycle assessment of lithium-based batteries: Review of sustainability dimensions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    6. Jie Yang & Fu Gu & Jianfeng Guo & Bin Chen, 2019. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Mobile Power Banks with Lithium-Ion Battery and Lithium-Ion Polymer Battery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Myriam Mansour & Hassan Harajli & Henri El Zakhem & Rima Manneh, 2024. "Cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of a photovoltaic–diesel hybrid system: the case of an industrial facility," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 17353-17381, July.
    8. Nadia Belmonte & Carlo Luetto & Stefano Staulo & Paola Rizzi & Marcello Baricco, 2017. "Case Studies of Energy Storage with Fuel Cells and Batteries for Stationary and Mobile Applications," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Ali Darudi & Hannes Weigt, 2024. "Review and Assessment of Decarbonized Future Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-38, September.
    10. Schopfer, S. & Tiefenbeck, V. & Staake, T., 2018. "Economic assessment of photovoltaic battery systems based on household load profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 229-248.
    11. Nils Thonemann & Anna Schulte & Daniel Maga, 2020. "How to Conduct Prospective Life Cycle Assessment for Emerging Technologies? A Systematic Review and Methodological Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Luca Ciacci & Fabrizio Passarini, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Environmental and Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-8, November.
    13. Roberto Morcillo-Jimenez & Karel Gutiérrez-Batista & Juan Gómez-Romero, 2023. "TSxtend: A Tool for Batch Analysis of Temporal Sensor Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-29, February.
    14. Villa-Arrieta, Manuel & Sumper, Andreas, 2019. "Economic evaluation of Nearly Zero Energy Cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 404-416.
    15. Yang, Ruixin & Xiong, Rui & He, Hongwen & Mu, Hao & Wang, Chun, 2017. "A novel method on estimating the degradation and state of charge of lithium-ion batteries used for electrical vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 336-345.
    16. Kang, Hyuna & Jung, Seunghoon & Kim, Hakpyeong & Jeoung, Jaewon & Hong, Taehoon, 2024. "Reinforcement learning-based optimal scheduling model of battery energy storage system at the building level," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    17. Freitas Gomes, Icaro Silvestre & Perez, Yannick & Suomalainen, Emilia, 2020. "Coupling small batteries and PV generation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    18. Hirschburger, Rafael & Weidlich, Anke, 2020. "Profitability of photovoltaic and battery systems on municipal buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1163-1173.
    19. Psimopoulos, Emmanouil & Bee, Elena & Widén, Joakim & Bales, Chris, 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of control algorithms for an exhaust air heat pump system for detached houses coupled to a photovoltaic system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 355-367.
    20. Koppelaar, R.H.E.M., 2017. "Solar-PV energy payback and net energy: Meta-assessment of study quality, reproducibility, and results harmonization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1241-1255.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3454-:d:379967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.