IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i11p2737-d364875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling of Polymeric Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers for Low-Medium Temperature Geothermal Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Ceglia

    (Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Adriano Macaluso

    (Department of Engineering, University of Study of Napoli “Parthenope”, 80143 Naples, Italy)

  • Elisa Marrasso

    (Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Maurizio Sasso

    (Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Laura Vanoli

    (Department of Engineering, University of Study of Napoli “Parthenope”, 80143 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

Improvements in using geothermal sources can be attained through the installation of power plants taking advantage of low and medium enthalpy available in poorly exploited geothermal sites. Geothermal fluids at medium and low temperature could be considered to feed binary cycle power plants using organic fluids for electricity “production” or in cogeneration configuration. The improvement in the use of geothermal aquifers at low-medium enthalpy in small deep sites favours the reduction of drilling well costs, and in addition, it allows the exploitation of local resources in the energy districts. The heat exchanger evaporator enables the thermal heat exchange between the working fluid (which is commonly an organic fluid for an Organic Rankine Cycle) and the geothermal fluid (supplied by the aquifer). Thus, it has to be realised taking into account the thermodynamic proprieties and chemical composition of the geothermal field. The geothermal fluid is typically very aggressive, and it leads to the corrosion of steel traditionally used in the heat exchangers. This paper analyses the possibility of using plastic material in the constructions of the evaporator installed in an Organic Rankine Cycle plant in order to overcome the problems of corrosion and the increase of heat exchanger thermal resistance due to the fouling effect. A comparison among heat exchangers made of commonly used materials, such as carbon, steel, and titanium, with alternative polymeric materials has been carried out. This analysis has been built in a mathematical approach using the correlation referred to in the literature about heat transfer in single-phase and two-phase fluids in a tube and/or in the shell side. The outcomes provide the heat transfer area for the shell and tube heat exchanger with a fixed thermal power size. The results have demonstrated that the plastic evaporator shows an increase of 47.0% of the heat transfer area but an economic installation cost saving of 48.0% over the titanium evaporator.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Ceglia & Adriano Macaluso & Elisa Marrasso & Maurizio Sasso & Laura Vanoli, 2020. "Modelling of Polymeric Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers for Low-Medium Temperature Geothermal Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:11:p:2737-:d:364875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/11/2737/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/11/2737/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erdogan, Anil & Colpan, Can Ozgur & Cakici, Duygu Melek, 2017. "Thermal design and analysis of a shell and tube heat exchanger integrating a geothermal based organic Rankine cycle and parabolic trough solar collectors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 372-391.
    2. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 435-446.
    3. Györke, Gábor & Deiters, Ulrich K. & Groniewsky, Axel & Lassu, Imre & Imre, Attila R., 2018. "Novel classification of pure working fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 288-300.
    4. Le, Van Long & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Feidt, Michel & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic optimizations of a waste heat to power plant driven by a subcritical ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) using pure or zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 622-638.
    5. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    6. Hajabdollahi, Zahra & Hajabdollahi, Farzaneh & Tehrani, Mahdi & Hajabdollahi, Hassan, 2013. "Thermo-economic environmental optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle for diesel waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 142-151.
    7. Wang, J.L. & Zhao, L. & Wang, X.D., 2010. "A comparative study of pure and zeotropic mixtures in low-temperature solar Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3366-3373, November.
    8. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (organic Rankine cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part A: Thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 423-434.
    9. Calise, F. & Di Fraia, S. & Macaluso, A. & Massarotti, N. & Vanoli, L., 2018. "A geothermal energy system for wastewater sludge drying and electricity production in a small island," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 130-143.
    10. Gómez Aláez, S.L. & Bombarda, P. & Invernizzi, C.M. & Iora, P. & Silva, P., 2015. "Evaluation of ORC modules performance adopting commercial plastic heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 882-890.
    11. Calise, Francesco & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Macaluso, Adriano & Vanoli, Laura & Piacentino, Antonio, 2016. "A novel solar-geothermal trigeneration system integrating water desalination: Design, dynamic simulation and economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1533-1547.
    12. Yang, Yi & Huo, Yaowu & Xia, Wenkai & Wang, Xurong & Zhao, Pan & Dai, Yiping, 2017. "Construction and preliminary test of a geothermal ORC system using geothermal resource from abandoned oil wells in the Huabei oilfield of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 633-645.
    13. Carlino, Stefano & Troiano, Antonio & Di Giuseppe, Maria Giulia & Tramelli, Anna & Troise, Claudia & Somma, Renato & De Natale, Giuseppe, 2016. "Exploitation of geothermal energy in active volcanic areas: A numerical modelling applied to high temperature Mofete geothermal field, at Campi Flegrei caldera (Southern Italy)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 54-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed M. Abdel-Ghany & Ibrahim M. Al-Helal & Abdullah Alsadon & Abdullah Ibrahim & Mohamed Shady, 2022. "Measuring and Predicting the In-Ground Temperature Profile for Geothermal Energy Systems in the Desert of Arid Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Jian Kuang & Shihua Qi & Xiangyun Hu, 2021. "New Insights into Crust and upper Mantle Structure in Guangdong Province, China and Its Geothermal Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Ceglia & Adriano Macaluso & Elisa Marrasso & Carlo Roselli & Laura Vanoli, 2020. "Energy, Environmental, and Economic Analyses of Geothermal Polygeneration System Using Dynamic Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-34, September.
    2. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    3. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    4. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    5. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    6. Gómez Aláez, S.L. & Bombarda, P. & Invernizzi, C.M. & Iora, P. & Silva, P., 2015. "Evaluation of ORC modules performance adopting commercial plastic heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 882-890.
    7. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    8. Chao Zhang & Jinglun Fu & Pengfei Yuan & Jianjun Liu, 2018. "Guidelines for Optimal Selection of Subcritical Low-Temperature Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle Configuration Considering Reinjection Temperature Limits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    10. Karimi, Shahram & Mansouri, Sima, 2018. "A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 600-619.
    11. Florian Heberle & Dieter Brüggemann, 2016. "Thermo-Economic Analysis of Zeotropic Mixtures and Pure Working Fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Jesper Graa Andreasen & Martin Ryhl Kærn & Fredrik Haglind, 2019. "Assessment of Methods for Performance Comparison of Pure and Zeotropic Working Fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Loni, Reyhaneh & Mahian, Omid & Markides, Christos N. & Bellos, Evangelos & le Roux, Willem G. & Kasaeian, Ailbakhsh & Najafi, Gholamhassan & Rajaee, Fatemeh, 2021. "A review of solar-driven organic Rankine cycles: Recent challenges and future outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    14. Roumpedakis, Tryfon C. & Loumpardis, George & Monokrousou, Evropi & Braimakis, Konstantinos & Charalampidis, Antonios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Exergetic and economic analysis of a solar driven small scale ORC," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1008-1024.
    15. Fabien Marty & Sylvain Serra & Sabine Sochard & Jean-Michel Reneaume, 2019. "Exergy Analysis and Optimization of a Combined Heat and Power Geothermal Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    17. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    18. Amini, Ali & Mirkhani, Nima & Pakjesm Pourfard, Pedram & Ashjaee, Mehdi & Khodkar, Mohammad Amin, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of low-grade waste heat recovery in Yazd combined-cycle power plant (Iran) by a CO2 transcritical Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 74-84.
    19. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    20. Yu, Haoshui & Eason, John & Biegler, Lorenz T. & Feng, Xiao, 2017. "Simultaneous heat integration and techno-economic optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for multiple waste heat stream recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 322-333.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:11:p:2737-:d:364875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.