IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i11p2878-d177856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guidelines for Optimal Selection of Subcritical Low-Temperature Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle Configuration Considering Reinjection Temperature Limits

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Zhang

    (Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    Tianjin Key Laboratory for Advanced Mechatronic System Design and Intelligent Control, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Jinglun Fu

    (Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Pengfei Yuan

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory for Advanced Mechatronic System Design and Intelligent Control, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Jianjun Liu

    (Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

General guidelines are proposed to select the optimal subcritical organic Rankine cycle configuration considering reinjection temperature limits for a low-temperature geothermal brine power plant. Saturated/superheated, non-regenerative/regenerative cycles are investigated. Evaporating temperature and overheating degree at the turbine inlet are selected as design variables, and highest plant exergy efficiency is pursued for current optimizations. Through theoretical analysis of mathematical modelling and typical case studies, a simple optimization approach is presented. The new approach consists of up to three judgements on reinjection temperature and evaporating temperature in comparison two optimization calculations along the saturated line and along the given reinjection temperature line. The potential optimal cycle configurations are saturated non-regenerative cycle, saturated regenerative cycle and superheated regenerative cycle. Then, this new optimization approach is applied to obtain optimal cycle configuration and relevant working condition. The working fluids investigated are R245fa, R1234ze(Z), isopentane, and isobutane. The saturated non-regenerative cycle is the optimal cycle when the reinjection temperature limit is equal or less than the optimal reinjection temperature with no reinjection constraint. Otherwise, the reinjection temperature limit influences not only the optimal cycle configuration but also the optimal working condition. Working fluid isobutane always achieves highest plant exergy efficiency for optimal cycles with either reinjection temperature limit.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Zhang & Jinglun Fu & Pengfei Yuan & Jianjun Liu, 2018. "Guidelines for Optimal Selection of Subcritical Low-Temperature Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle Configuration Considering Reinjection Temperature Limits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:2878-:d:177856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/2878/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/2878/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saleh, Bahaa & Koglbauer, Gerald & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2007. "Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1210-1221.
    2. Satanphol, K. & Pridasawas, W. & Suphanit, B., 2017. "A study on optimal composition of zeotropic working fluid in an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for low grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 326-339.
    3. Maraver, Daniel & Royo, Javier & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2014. "Systematic optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) constrained by technical parameters in multiple applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 11-29.
    4. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (organic Rankine cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part A: Thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 423-434.
    5. Yari, Mortaza, 2010. "Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-121.
    6. Vivian, Jacopo & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2015. "A general framework to select working fluid and configuration of ORCs for low-to-medium temperature heat sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 727-746.
    7. Borsukiewicz-Gozdur, Aleksandra, 2013. "Exergy analysis for maximizing power of organic Rankine cycle power plant driven by open type energy source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 73-81.
    8. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 435-446.
    9. Le, Van Long & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Feidt, Michel & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic optimizations of a waste heat to power plant driven by a subcritical ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) using pure or zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 622-638.
    10. Clarke, Joshua & McLeskey, James T., 2015. "Multi-objective particle swarm optimization of binary geothermal power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 302-314.
    11. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    12. Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Bonamico, Eleonora, 2017. "Design guidelines for the choice between single and dual pressure layouts in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 413-431.
    13. Yamamoto, Takahisa & Furuhata, Tomohiko & Arai, Norio & Mori, Koichi, 2001. "Design and testing of the Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 239-251.
    14. Chen, Qicheng & Xu, Jinliang & Chen, Hongxia, 2012. "A new design method for Organic Rankine Cycles with constraint of inlet and outlet heat carrier fluid temperatures coupling with the heat source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 562-573.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan Zhao & Chenghao Gao & Chengjun Li & Jie Sun & Chunyan Wang & Qiang Liu & Jun Zhao, 2022. "Energy and Exergy Analyses of Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycles Considering the Effect of Brine Reinjection Temperature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Miguel Castro Oliveira & Muriel Iten & Pedro L. Cruz & Helena Monteiro, 2020. "Review on Energy Efficiency Progresses, Technologies and Strategies in the Ceramic Sector Focusing on Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Gábor Györke & Axel Groniewsky & Attila R. Imre, 2019. "A Simple Method of Finding New Dry and Isentropic Working Fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-11, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    2. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    3. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    4. Francesco Calise & Davide Capuano & Laura Vanoli, 2015. "Dynamic Simulation and Exergo-Economic Optimization of a Hybrid Solar–Geothermal Cogeneration Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-41, April.
    5. Fabien Marty & Sylvain Serra & Sabine Sochard & Jean-Michel Reneaume, 2019. "Exergy Analysis and Optimization of a Combined Heat and Power Geothermal Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2016. "Economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system with lower global warming potential working fluids in geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1201-1213.
    7. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    8. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    9. Calise, Francesco & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Macaluso, Adriano & Vanoli, Laura & Piacentino, Antonio, 2016. "A novel solar-geothermal trigeneration system integrating water desalination: Design, dynamic simulation and economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1533-1547.
    10. Yang, Lixiang & Gong, Maoqiong & Guo, Hao & Dong, Xueqiang & Shen, Jun & Wu, Jianfeng, 2016. "Effects of critical and boiling temperatures on system performance and fluid selection indicator for low temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 830-844.
    11. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    12. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Mikelis, Angelos & Charalampidis, Antonios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Exergetic performance of CO2 and ultra-low GWP refrigerant mixtures as working fluids in ORC for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    14. Vivian, Jacopo & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2015. "A general framework to select working fluid and configuration of ORCs for low-to-medium temperature heat sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 727-746.
    15. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Design and performance analyses for a novel organic Rankine cycle with supercritical-subcritical heat absorption process coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1400-1414.
    16. He, Chao & Liu, Chao & Zhou, Mengtong & Xie, Hui & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Wu, Shuangying & Li, Yourong, 2014. "A new selection principle of working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle coupling with different heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 283-291.
    17. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    18. Amini, Ali & Mirkhani, Nima & Pakjesm Pourfard, Pedram & Ashjaee, Mehdi & Khodkar, Mohammad Amin, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of low-grade waste heat recovery in Yazd combined-cycle power plant (Iran) by a CO2 transcritical Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 74-84.
    19. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    20. Liu, Qiang & Shang, Linlin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2016. "Performance analyses of a hybrid geothermal–fossil power generation system using low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 149-162.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:2878-:d:177856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.