IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2019i1p78-d300930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Measurement of Additional Losses in Induction Motors: Discussion about the Actually Achievable Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Bucci

    (Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Ciancetta

    (Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Edoardo Fiorucci

    (Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Simone Mari

    (Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Maria Anna Segreto

    (LAERTE Laboratory, ENEA (Italian National Agency for New Technologies Energy and Sustainable Economic Development), 40129 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

In this paper, a discussion is presented concerning the combined uncertainty when measuring residual and additional losses in the efficiency evaluation of three-phase induction motors, by evaluating some experimental results obtained on a commercial motor. The IEC 60034-2-1 standard is considered, in comparison to a previous version of this standard requiring the estimation of residual losses instead of their measurement. A major goal is to investigate if the complex measurement method introduced in the present version of the standard is justified or not by processing the actually achievable uncertainty both in additional losses and in the overall efficiency measurement. Finally, some considerations are presented about additional issues concerning the classification of the tested motor, in comparison to the IE (International Efficiency) efficiency levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Bucci & Fabrizio Ciancetta & Edoardo Fiorucci & Simone Mari & Maria Anna Segreto, 2019. "The Measurement of Additional Losses in Induction Motors: Discussion about the Actually Achievable Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:78-:d:300930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/78/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/78/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kang Wang & Ruituo Huai & Zhihao Yu & Xiaoyang Zhang & Fengjuan Li & Luwei Zhang, 2019. "Comparison Study of Induction Motor Models Considering Iron Loss for Electric Drives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Nezih Gokhan Ozcelik & Ugur Emre Dogru & Murat Imeryuz & Lale T. Ergene, 2019. "Synchronous Reluctance Motor vs. Induction Motor at Low-Power Industrial Applications: Design and Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Vadim Kazakbaev & Vladimir Prakht & Vladimir Dmitrievskii & Mohamed N. Ibrahim & Safarbek Oshurbekov & Sergey Sarapulov, 2019. "Efficiency Analysis of Low Electric Power Drives Employing Induction and Synchronous Reluctance Motors in Pump Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joseba Lopez-Mendia & Eider Robles & Salvador Ceballos & Pablo Ruiz-Minguela & Jacobo Rotger, 2024. "Improving the OWC Wave Energy Converter Power Take-Off Efficiency throughout Experimental and Numerical Characterisation of an SCIG," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyunwoo Kim & Yeji Park & Seung-Taek Oh & Hyungkwan Jang & Sung-Hong Won & Yon-Do Chun & Ju Lee, 2020. "A Study on the Rotor Design of Line Start Synchronous Reluctance Motor for IE4 Efficiency and Improving Power Factor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Victor Goman & Vladimir Prakht & Vadim Kazakbaev & Vladimir Dmitrievskii, 2021. "Comparative Study of Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions of Variable-Speed Electric Drives with Induction and Synchronous Reluctance Motors in Pump Units," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Florin Pop-Pîgleşan & Adrian-Cornel Pop & Claudia Marțiş, 2021. "Synchronous Reluctance Machines for Automotive Cooling Fan Systems: Numerical and Experimental Study of Different Slot-Pole Combinations and Winding Types," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, January.
    4. Paweł Idziak & Krzysztof Kowalski, 2021. "Analysis of Selected Operating States of the Line Start Synchronous Reluctance Motor Using the Finite Element Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Yuanzhe Zhao & Linjie Ren & Zhiming Liao & Guobin Lin, 2021. "A Novel Model Predictive Direct Torque Control Method for Improving Steady-State Performance of the Synchronous Reluctance Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Safarbek Oshurbekov & Vadim Kazakbaev & Vladimir Prakht & Vladimir Dmitrievskii, 2021. "Improving Reliability and Energy Efficiency of Three Parallel Pumps by Selecting Trade-Off Operating Points," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Elzbieta Szychta & Leszek Szychta, 2021. "Collective Losses of Low Power Cage Induction Motors—A New Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Vadim Kazakbaev & Vladimir Prakht & Vladimir Dmitrievskii & Safarbek Oshurbekov & Dmitry Golovanov, 2020. "Life Cycle Energy Cost Assessment for Pump Units with Various Types of Line-Start Operating Motors Including Cable Losses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Maria Dems & Krzysztof Komeza & Jacek Szulakowski & Witold Kubiak, 2021. "Dynamic Simulation of High-Speed Induction Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Chiweta E. Abunike & Udochukwu B. Akuru & Ogbonnaya I. Okoro & Chukwuemeka C. Awah, 2023. "Sizing, Modeling, and Performance Comparison of Squirrel-Cage Induction and Wound-Field Flux Switching Motors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Chaymae Fahassa & Yassine Zahraoui & Mohammed Akherraz & Mohammed Kharrich & Ehab E. Elattar & Salah Kamel, 2022. "Induction Motor DTC Performance Improvement by Inserting Fuzzy Logic Controllers and Twelve-Sector Neural Network Switching Table," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Duc-Kien Ngo & Min-Fu Hsieh, 2019. "Performance Analysis of Synchronous Reluctance Motor with Limited Amount of Permanent Magnet," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Vadim Kazakbaev & Aleksey Paramonov & Vladimir Dmitrievskii & Vladimir Prakht & Victor Goman, 2022. "Indirect Efficiency Measurement Method for Line-Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Rajesh Poola & Tsuyoshi Hanamoto, 2022. "Automated QFT-Based PI Tuning for Speed Control of SynRM Drive with Analytical Selection of QFT Control Specifications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Hasan Erteza Gelani & Faizan Dastgeer & Mashood Nasir & Sidra Khan & Josep M. Guerrero, 2021. "AC vs. DC Distribution Efficiency: Are We on the Right Path?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Hyunwoo Kim & Yeji Park & Huai-Cong Liu & Pil-Wan Han & Ju Lee, 2020. "Study on Line-Start Permanent Magnet Assistance Synchronous Reluctance Motor for Improving Efficiency and Power Factor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Ondrej Lipcak & Filip Baum & Jan Bauer, 2021. "Influence of Selected Non-Ideal Aspects on Active and Reactive Power MRAS for Stator and Rotor Resistance Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Linjie Ren & Guobin Lin & Yuanzhe Zhao & Zhiming Liao, 2021. "Smart Collaborative Performance-Induced Parameter Identification Algorithms for Synchronous Reluctance Machine Magnetic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:78-:d:300930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.