IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i16p3596-d1220699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sizing, Modeling, and Performance Comparison of Squirrel-Cage Induction and Wound-Field Flux Switching Motors

Author

Listed:
  • Chiweta E. Abunike

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike 440101, Abia State, Nigeria
    School of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK)

  • Udochukwu B. Akuru

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria 0183, South Africa
    Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka 410001, Enugu State, Nigeria)

  • Ogbonnaya I. Okoro

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike 440101, Abia State, Nigeria)

  • Chukwuemeka C. Awah

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike 440101, Abia State, Nigeria)

Abstract

In this study, the analytical design and electromagnetic performance comparison of a squirrel-cage induction motor (SCIM) and a wound-field flux switching motor (WFFSM) for high-speed brushless industrial motor drives is undertaken for the first time. The study uses analytical sizing techniques and finite element analysis (FEA) to model and predict the performance of both motors at a 7.5 kW output power. This study includes detailed equations and algorithms for sizing and modeling of both types of motors, as well as performance calculations that aid in motor selection, design optimization, and system integration. The main findings show that the SCIM has superior torque performance for starting and overload conditions, while the WFFSM offers advantages in power factor, efficiency over a wide operating range, and potential for higher peak power output. To this end, the WFFSM is capable of high-speed and high-efficiency operation while the SCIM is suitable for applications requiring variable speed operation. The validation study shows good agreement between analytical and FEA calculations for both motors. The results provide insights into the design and performance characteristics of both motors, enabling researchers to explore innovative approaches for improving their efficiency, reliability, and overall performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiweta E. Abunike & Udochukwu B. Akuru & Ogbonnaya I. Okoro & Chukwuemeka C. Awah, 2023. "Sizing, Modeling, and Performance Comparison of Squirrel-Cage Induction and Wound-Field Flux Switching Motors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:16:p:3596-:d:1220699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/16/3596/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/16/3596/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Danilo Ferreira de Souza & Francisco Antônio Marino Salotti & Ildo Luís Sauer & Hédio Tatizawa & Aníbal Traça de Almeida & Arnaldo Gakiya Kanashiro, 2022. "A Performance Evaluation of Three-Phase Induction Electric Motors between 1945 and 2020," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-31, March.
    2. Nezih Gokhan Ozcelik & Ugur Emre Dogru & Murat Imeryuz & Lale T. Ergene, 2019. "Synchronous Reluctance Motor vs. Induction Motor at Low-Power Industrial Applications: Design and Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Trianni, Andrea & Cagno, Enrico & Accordini, Davide, 2019. "Energy efficiency measures in electric motors systems: A novel classification highlighting specific implications in their adoption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paweł Idziak & Krzysztof Kowalski, 2021. "Analysis of Selected Operating States of the Line Start Synchronous Reluctance Motor Using the Finite Element Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Yuanzhe Zhao & Linjie Ren & Zhiming Liao & Guobin Lin, 2021. "A Novel Model Predictive Direct Torque Control Method for Improving Steady-State Performance of the Synchronous Reluctance Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Fábio de Oliveira Neves & Henrique Ewbank & José Arnaldo Frutuoso Roveda & Andrea Trianni & Fernando Pinhabel Marafão & Sandra Regina Monteiro Masalskiene Roveda, 2022. "Economic and Production-Related Implications for Industrial Energy Efficiency: A Logistic Regression Analysis on Cross-Cutting Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Giovanni Bucci & Fabrizio Ciancetta & Edoardo Fiorucci & Simone Mari & Maria Anna Segreto, 2019. "The Measurement of Additional Losses in Induction Motors: Discussion about the Actually Achievable Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Hyunwoo Kim & Yeji Park & Seung-Taek Oh & Hyungkwan Jang & Sung-Hong Won & Yon-Do Chun & Ju Lee, 2020. "A Study on the Rotor Design of Line Start Synchronous Reluctance Motor for IE4 Efficiency and Improving Power Factor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Ahmed, Abdelsalam A. & Ramadan, Haitham S., 2020. "Prototype implementation of advanced electric vehicles drivetrain system: Verification and validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    7. Mabrouki Jamal, 2022. "Mathematical Modelling of Biogas Production in a Controlled Landfill: Characterization, Valorization Study and Energy Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Duc-Kien Ngo & Min-Fu Hsieh, 2019. "Performance Analysis of Synchronous Reluctance Motor with Limited Amount of Permanent Magnet," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Vadim Kazakbaev & Aleksey Paramonov & Vladimir Dmitrievskii & Vladimir Prakht & Victor Goman, 2022. "Indirect Efficiency Measurement Method for Line-Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Rajesh Poola & Tsuyoshi Hanamoto, 2022. "Automated QFT-Based PI Tuning for Speed Control of SynRM Drive with Analytical Selection of QFT Control Specifications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Hyunwoo Kim & Yeji Park & Huai-Cong Liu & Pil-Wan Han & Ju Lee, 2020. "Study on Line-Start Permanent Magnet Assistance Synchronous Reluctance Motor for Improving Efficiency and Power Factor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Accordini, D. & Cagno, E. & Trianni, A., 2021. "Identification and characterization of decision-making factors over industrial energy efficiency measures in electric motor systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Victor Goman & Vladimir Prakht & Vadim Kazakbaev & Vladimir Dmitrievskii, 2021. "Comparative Study of Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions of Variable-Speed Electric Drives with Induction and Synchronous Reluctance Motors in Pump Units," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Linjie Ren & Guobin Lin & Yuanzhe Zhao & Zhiming Liao, 2021. "Smart Collaborative Performance-Induced Parameter Identification Algorithms for Synchronous Reluctance Machine Magnetic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Boscariol, Paolo & Richiedei, Dario, 2022. "Energy optimal design of servo-actuated systems: A concurrent approach based on scaling rules," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    16. Florin Pop-Pîgleşan & Adrian-Cornel Pop & Claudia Marțiş, 2021. "Synchronous Reluctance Machines for Automotive Cooling Fan Systems: Numerical and Experimental Study of Different Slot-Pole Combinations and Winding Types," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, January.
    17. Cagno, Enrico & Accordini, Davide & Trianni, Andrea & Katic, Mile & Ferrari, Nicolò & Gambaro, Federico, 2022. "Understanding the impacts of energy efficiency measures on a Company’s operational performance: A new framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    18. Gómez, Julio R. & Sousa, Vladimir & Cabello Eras, Juan J. & Sagastume Gutiérrez, Alexis & Viego, Percy R. & Quispe, Enrique C. & de León, Gabriel, 2022. "Assessment criteria of the feasibility of replacement standard efficiency electric motors with high-efficiency motors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:16:p:3596-:d:1220699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.