IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i11p2190-d238321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synchronous Reluctance Motor vs. Induction Motor at Low-Power Industrial Applications: Design and Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Nezih Gokhan Ozcelik

    (Electrical Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Ugur Emre Dogru

    (Electrical Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Murat Imeryuz

    (Electrical Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Lale T. Ergene

    (Electrical Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

Although three-phase induction motors are the most common motor type in industry, a growing interest has arisen in emerging electric motor technologies like synchronous reluctance motors and permanent magnet motors. Synchronous reluctance motors are a step forward compared to permanent magnet motors when the cost of the system is considered. The main focus of this study is low-power industrial applications, which generally use three-phase induction motors. In this study, the synchronous reluctance motor family is compared at three different power levels: 2.2 kW, 4 kW, and 5.5 kW. The aim of this study is to design and compare synchronous reluctance motors, which can be alternative to the reference induction motors. Finite element analysis is performed for the reference induction motors initially. Their stators are kept the same and the rotors are redesigned to satisfy output power requirements of the induction motors. Detailed design, analysis, and optimization processes are applied to the synchronous reluctance motors considering efficiency, power density, and manufacturing. The results are evaluated, and the optimized designs are chosen for each power level. They are prototyped and tested to measure their performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Nezih Gokhan Ozcelik & Ugur Emre Dogru & Murat Imeryuz & Lale T. Ergene, 2019. "Synchronous Reluctance Motor vs. Induction Motor at Low-Power Industrial Applications: Design and Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:11:p:2190-:d:238321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/11/2190/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/11/2190/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chih-Hong Lin & Chang-Chou Hwang, 2018. "High Performances Design of a Six-Phase Synchronous Reluctance Motor Using Multi-Objective Optimization with Altered Bee Colony Optimization and Taguchi Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyunwoo Kim & Yeji Park & Huai-Cong Liu & Pil-Wan Han & Ju Lee, 2020. "Study on Line-Start Permanent Magnet Assistance Synchronous Reluctance Motor for Improving Efficiency and Power Factor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Rajesh Poola & Tsuyoshi Hanamoto, 2022. "Automated QFT-Based PI Tuning for Speed Control of SynRM Drive with Analytical Selection of QFT Control Specifications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Paweł Idziak & Krzysztof Kowalski, 2021. "Analysis of Selected Operating States of the Line Start Synchronous Reluctance Motor Using the Finite Element Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Linjie Ren & Guobin Lin & Yuanzhe Zhao & Zhiming Liao, 2021. "Smart Collaborative Performance-Induced Parameter Identification Algorithms for Synchronous Reluctance Machine Magnetic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Chiweta E. Abunike & Udochukwu B. Akuru & Ogbonnaya I. Okoro & Chukwuemeka C. Awah, 2023. "Sizing, Modeling, and Performance Comparison of Squirrel-Cage Induction and Wound-Field Flux Switching Motors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Florin Pop-Pîgleşan & Adrian-Cornel Pop & Claudia Marțiş, 2021. "Synchronous Reluctance Machines for Automotive Cooling Fan Systems: Numerical and Experimental Study of Different Slot-Pole Combinations and Winding Types," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, January.
    7. Duc-Kien Ngo & Min-Fu Hsieh, 2019. "Performance Analysis of Synchronous Reluctance Motor with Limited Amount of Permanent Magnet," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Giovanni Bucci & Fabrizio Ciancetta & Edoardo Fiorucci & Simone Mari & Maria Anna Segreto, 2019. "The Measurement of Additional Losses in Induction Motors: Discussion about the Actually Achievable Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Vadim Kazakbaev & Aleksey Paramonov & Vladimir Dmitrievskii & Vladimir Prakht & Victor Goman, 2022. "Indirect Efficiency Measurement Method for Line-Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Yuanzhe Zhao & Linjie Ren & Zhiming Liao & Guobin Lin, 2021. "A Novel Model Predictive Direct Torque Control Method for Improving Steady-State Performance of the Synchronous Reluctance Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Victor Goman & Vladimir Prakht & Vadim Kazakbaev & Vladimir Dmitrievskii, 2021. "Comparative Study of Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions of Variable-Speed Electric Drives with Induction and Synchronous Reluctance Motors in Pump Units," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Hyunwoo Kim & Yeji Park & Seung-Taek Oh & Hyungkwan Jang & Sung-Hong Won & Yon-Do Chun & Ju Lee, 2020. "A Study on the Rotor Design of Line Start Synchronous Reluctance Motor for IE4 Efficiency and Improving Power Factor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavol Rafajdus & Valeria Hrabovcova & Pavel Lehocky & Pavol Makys & Filip Holub, 2018. "Effect of Saturation on Field Oriented Control of the New Designed Reluctance Synchronous Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Bonan Huang & Chaoming Zheng & Qiuye Sun & Ruixue Hu, 2019. "Optimal Economic Dispatch for Integrated Power and Heating Systems Considering Transmission Losses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Jiongjiong Cai & Peng Ke & Xiao Qu & Zihui Wang, 2022. "Research on the Design of Auxiliary Generator for Enthalpy Reduction and Steady Speed Scroll Expander," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Peter Bober & Želmíra Ferková, 2020. "Comparison of an Off-Line Optimized Firing Angle Modulation and Torque Sharing Functions for Switched Reluctance Motor Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Chih-Hong Lin, 2020. "Altered Grey Wolf Optimization and Taguchi Method with FEA for Six-Phase Copper Squirrel Cage Rotor Induction Motor Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:11:p:2190-:d:238321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.