IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i6p1046-d214958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Floating Membrane Bioreactors with High Gas Hold-Up for Syngas-to-Biomethane Conversion

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinos Chandolias

    (Swedish Centre for Resource Recovery (SCRR), Faculty of Textiles engineering and Business, University of Borås, Allégatan 1, 501 90 Borås, Sweden)

  • Enise Pekgenc

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, 34467 Sarıyer/İstanbul, Turkey)

  • Mohammad J. Taherzadeh

    (Swedish Centre for Resource Recovery (SCRR), Faculty of Textiles engineering and Business, University of Borås, Allégatan 1, 501 90 Borås, Sweden)

Abstract

The low gas-to-liquid mass transfer rate is one of the main challenges in syngas biomethanation. In this work, a new concept of the floating membrane system with high gas hold-up was introduced in order to enhance the mass transfer rate of the process. In addition, the effect of the inoculum-to-syngas ratio was investigated. The experiments were conducted at 55 °C with an anaerobic mixed culture in both batch and continuous modes. According to the results from the continuous experiments, the H 2 and CO conversion rates in the floating membrane bioreactor were approximately 38% and 28% higher in comparison to the free (suspended) cell bioreactors. The doubling of the thickness of the membrane bed resulted in an increase of the conversion rates of H 2 and CO by approximately 6% and 12%, respectively. The highest H 2 and CO consumption rates and CH 4 production rate recorded were approximately 22 mmol/(L·d), 50 mmol/(L·d), and 34.41 mmol/(L·d), respectively, obtained at the highest inoculum-to-syngas ratio of 0.2 g/mL. To conclude, the use of the floating membrane system enhanced the syngas biomethanation rates, while a thicker membrane bed resulted in even higher syngas conversion rates. Moreover, the increase of the inoculum-to-syngas ratio of up to 0.2 g/mL favored the syngas conversion.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinos Chandolias & Enise Pekgenc & Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, 2019. "Floating Membrane Bioreactors with High Gas Hold-Up for Syngas-to-Biomethane Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:6:p:1046-:d:214958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/6/1046/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/6/1046/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Yanwen & Brown, Robert & Wen, Zhiyou, 2014. "Enhancing mass transfer and ethanol production in syngas fermentation of Clostridium carboxidivorans P7 through a monolithic biofilm reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 68-76.
    2. Reinhard Rauch & Jitka Hrbek & Hermann Hofbauer, 2014. "Biomass gasification for synthesis gas production and applications of the syngas," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 343-362, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asimakopoulos, Konstantinos & Kaufmann-Elfang, Martin & Lundholm-Høffner, Christoffer & Rasmussen, Niels B.K. & Grimalt-Alemany, Antonio & Gavala, Hariklia N. & Skiadas, Ioannis V., 2021. "Scale up study of a thermophilic trickle bed reactor performing syngas biomethanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    2. Andreides, Dominik & Stransky, Dominik & Bartackova, Jana & Pokorna, Dana & Zabranska, Jana, 2022. "Syngas biomethanation in countercurrent flow trickle-bed reactor operated under different temperature conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1329-1335.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. AlNouss, Ahmed & McKay, Gordon & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2020. "Enhancing waste to hydrogen production through biomass feedstock blending: A techno-economic-environmental evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    3. Donatella Barisano & Giuseppe Canneto & Francesco Nanna & Antonio Villone & Emanuele Fanelli & Cesare Freda & Massimiliano Grieco & Andrea Lotierzo & Giacinto Cornacchia & Giacobbe Braccio & Vera Marc, 2022. "Investigation of an Intensified Thermo-Chemical Experimental Set-Up for Hydrogen Production from Biomass: Gasification Process Integrated to a Portable Purification System—Part II," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Stolecka, Katarzyna & Rusin, Andrzej, 2020. "Analysis of hazards related to syngas production and transport," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2535-2555.
    5. Gabbrielli, Roberto & Barontini, Federica & Frigo, Stefano & Bressan, Luigi, 2022. "Numerical analysis of bio-methane production from biomass-sewage sludge oxy-steam gasification and methanation process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    6. Patuzzi, Francesco & Basso, Daniele & Vakalis, Stergios & Antolini, Daniele & Piazzi, Stefano & Benedetti, Vittoria & Cordioli, Eleonora & Baratieri, Marco, 2021. "State-of-the-art of small-scale biomass gasification systems: An extensive and unique monitoring review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    7. Lech Nowicki & Dorota Siuta & Maciej Markowski, 2020. "Pyrolysis of Rapeseed Oil Press Cake and Steam Gasification of Solid Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, August.
    8. Kuba, Matthias & Kraft, Stephan & Kirnbauer, Friedrich & Maierhans, Frank & Hofbauer, Hermann, 2018. "Influence of controlled handling of solid inorganic materials and design changes on the product gas quality in dual fluid bed gasification of woody biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 230-240.
    9. Parisa Heidarnejad & Hadi Genceli & Nasim Hashemian & Mustafa Asker & Mohammad Al-Rawi, 2024. "Biomass-Fueled Organic Rankine Cycles: State of the Art and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-30, August.
    10. Benedikt, Florian & Kuba, Matthias & Schmid, Johannes Christian & Müller, Stefan & Hofbauer, Hermann, 2019. "Assessment of correlations between tar and product gas composition in dual fluidized bed steam gasification for online tar prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1138-1149.
    11. Ahsanullah Soomro & Shiyi Chen & Shiwei Ma & Wenguo Xiang, 2018. "Catalytic activities of nickel, dolomite, and olivine for tar removal and H2-enriched gas production in biomass gasification process," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(6), pages 839-867, September.
    12. Giuntini, Lorenzo & Lamioni, Rachele & Linari, Luca & Saccomano, Pietro & Mainardi, Davide & Tognotti, Leonardo & Galletti, Chiara, 2022. "Decarbonization of a tissue paper plant: Advanced numerical simulations to assess the replacement of fossil fuels with a biomass-derived syngas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 884-893.
    13. Yang, Chunlei & Dong, Lifeng & Gao, Yanhua & Jia, Peng & Diao, Qiyu, 2021. "Engineering acetogens for biofuel production: From cellular biology to process improvement," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Abubackar, Haris Nalakath & Bengelsdorf, Frank R. & Dürre, Peter & Veiga, María C. & Kennes, Christian, 2016. "Improved operating strategy for continuous fermentation of carbon monoxide to fuel-ethanol by clostridia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 210-217.
    15. Khanongnuch, Ramita & Abubackar, Haris Nalakath & Keskin, Tugba & Gungormusler, Mine & Duman, Gozde & Aggarwal, Ayushi & Behera, Shishir Kumar & Li, Lu & Bayar, Büşra & Rene, Eldon R., 2022. "Bioprocesses for resource recovery from waste gases: Current trends and industrial applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    16. Motta, Ingrid Lopes & Miranda, Nahieh Toscano & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2018. "Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 998-1023.
    17. Abdul Rahim Shaikh & Qinhui Wang & Long Han & Yi Feng & Zohaib Sharif & Zhixin Li & Jianmeng Cen & Sunel Kumar, 2022. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen and Electricity Production by Biomass Calcium Looping Gasification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Selina Hafner & Max Schmid & Günter Scheffknecht, 2021. "Parametric Study on the Adjustability of the Syngas Composition by Sorption-Enhanced Gasification in a Dual-Fluidized Bed Pilot Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Azize Ayol & Luciana Peixoto & Tugba Keskin & Haris Nalakath Abubackar, 2021. "Reactor Designs and Configurations for Biological and Bioelectrochemical C1 Gas Conversion: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-36, November.
    20. Knutsson, Pavleta & Maric, Jelena & Knutsson, Jesper & Larsson, Anton & Breitholtz, Claes & Seemann, Martin, 2019. "Potassium speciation and distribution for the K2CO3 additive-induced activation/deactivation of olivine during gasification of woody biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 538-544.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:6:p:1046-:d:214958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.