IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i4p680-d207581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple Wind Turbine Wakes Modeling Considering the Faster Wake Recovery in Overlapped Wakes

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenzhou Shao

    (State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Ying Wu

    (State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Li Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Shuang Han

    (State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yongqian Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

In a wind farm some wind turbines may be affected by multiple upwind wakes. The commonly used approach in engineering to simulate the interaction effect of different wakes is to combine the single analytical wake model and the interaction model. The higher turbulence level and shear stress profile generated by upwind turbines in the superposed area leads to faster wake recovery. The existing interaction models are all analytical models based on some simple assumptions of superposition, which cannot characterize this phenomenon. Therefore, in this study, a mixing coefficient is introduced into the classical energy balance interaction model with the aim of reflecting the effect of turbulence intensity on velocity recovery in multiple wakes. An empirical expression is also given to calculate this parameter. The performance of the new model is evaluated using data from the Lillgrund and the Horns Rev I offshore wind farms, and the simulations agree reasonably with the observations. The comparison of different interaction model simulation results with measured data show that the calculation accuracy of this new interaction model is high, and the mean absolute percentage error of wind farm efficiency is reduced by 5.3% and 1.58%, respectively, compared to the most commonly used sum of squares interaction model.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenzhou Shao & Ying Wu & Li Li & Shuang Han & Yongqian Liu, 2019. "Multiple Wind Turbine Wakes Modeling Considering the Faster Wake Recovery in Overlapped Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:4:p:680-:d:207581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/4/680/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/4/680/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veisi, Amin Allah & Shafiei Mayam, Mohammad Hossein, 2017. "Effects of blade rotation direction in the wake region of two in-line turbines using Large Eddy Simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 375-392.
    2. Tian, Linlin & Zhu, Weijun & Shen, Wenzhong & Song, Yilei & Zhao, Ning, 2017. "Prediction of multi-wake problems using an improved Jensen wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 457-469.
    3. Kuo, Jim Y.J. & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2015. "A mechanistic semi-empirical wake interaction model for wind farm layout optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2157-2165.
    4. Amin Niayifar & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2016. "Analytical Modeling of Wind Farms: A New Approach for Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Göçmen, Tuhfe & Laan, Paul van der & Réthoré, Pierre-Elouan & Diaz, Alfredo Peña & Larsen, Gunner Chr. & Ott, Søren, 2016. "Wind turbine wake models developed at the technical university of Denmark: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 752-769.
    6. Yimei Wang & Yongqian Liu & Li Li & David Infield & Shuang Han, 2018. "Short-Term Wind Power Forecasting Based on Clustering Pre-Calculated CFD Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Huiwen Liu & Imran Hayat & Yaqing Jin & Leonardo P. Chamorro, 2018. "On the Evolution of the Integral Time Scale within Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
    8. Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2016. "Optimization of wind turbine layout position in a wind farm using a newly-developed two-dimensional wake model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 192-200.
    9. Leonardo P. Chamorro & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2011. "Turbulent Flow Inside and Above a Wind Farm: A Wind-Tunnel Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Jeon, Sanghyeon & Kim, Bumsuk & Huh, Jongchul, 2015. "Comparison and verification of wake models in an onshore wind farm considering single wake condition of the 2 MW wind turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1769-1777.
    11. Jie Tian & Dao Zhou & Chi Su & Mohsen Soltani & Zhe Chen & Frede Blaabjerg, 2017. "Wind Turbine Power Curve Design for Optimal Power Generation in Wind Farms Considering Wake Effect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Sang Lee & Peter Vorobieff & Svetlana Poroseva, 2018. "Interaction of Wind Turbine Wakes under Various Atmospheric Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Wim Munters & Johan Meyers, 2018. "Dynamic Strategies for Yaw and Induction Control of Wind Farms Based on Large-Eddy Simulation and Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-32, January.
    14. Charlotte Bay Hasager & Leif Rasmussen & Alfredo Peña & Leo E. Jensen & Pierre-Elouan Réthoré, 2013. "Wind Farm Wake: The Horns Rev Photo Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Esteban Ferrer & Oliver M.F. Browne & Eusebio Valero, 2017. "Sensitivity Analysis to Control the Far-Wake Unsteadiness Behind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    16. José F. Herbert-Acero & Oliver Probst & Pierre-Elouan Réthoré & Gunner Chr. Larsen & Krystel K. Castillo-Villar, 2014. "A Review of Methodological Approaches for the Design and Optimization of Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-87, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richmond, M. & Sobey, A. & Pandit, R. & Kolios, A., 2020. "Stochastic assessment of aerodynamics within offshore wind farms based on machine-learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 650-661.
    2. Ziyu Zhang & Peng Huang & Haocheng Sun, 2020. "A Novel Analytical Wake Model with a Cosine-Shaped Velocity Deficit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Houssem R. E. H. Bouchekara & Yusuf A. Sha’aban & Mohammad S. Shahriar & Makbul A. M. Ramli & Abdullahi A. Mas’ud, 2023. "Wind Farm Layout Optimization/Expansion with Real Wind Turbines Using a Multi-Objective EA Based on an Enhanced Inverted Generational Distance Metric Combined with the Two-Archive Algorithm 2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-32, January.
    4. Dongqin Zhang & Yang Liang & Chao Li & Yiqing Xiao & Gang Hu, 2022. "Applicability of Wake Models to Predictions of Turbine-Induced Velocity Deficit and Wind Farm Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Yuan Li & Zengjin Xu & Zuoxia Xing & Bowen Zhou & Haoqian Cui & Bowen Liu & Bo Hu, 2020. "A Modified Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes-Based Wind Turbine Wake Model Considering Correction Modules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Yutaka Hara & Yoshifumi Jodai & Tomoyuki Okinaga & Masaru Furukawa, 2021. "Numerical Analysis of the Dynamic Interaction between Two Closely Spaced Vertical-Axis Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Francesco Castellani & Davide Astolfi, 2020. "Editorial on Special Issue “Wind Turbine Power Optimization Technology”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-4, April.
    8. Angel G. Gonzalez-Rodriguez & Javier Serrano-González & Manuel Burgos-Payán & Jesús Manuel Riquelme-Santos, 2021. "Realistic Optimization of Parallelogram-Shaped Offshore Wind Farms Considering Continuously Distributed Wind Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Paxis Marques João Roque & Shyama Pada Chowdhury & Zhongjie Huan, 2021. "Performance Enhancement of Proposed Namaacha Wind Farm by Minimising Losses Due to the Wake Effect: A Mozambican Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Brooks, Sam & Mahmood, Minhal & Roy, Rajkumar & Manolesos, Marinos & Salonitis, Konstantinos, 2023. "Self-reconfiguration simulations of turbines to reduce uneven farm degradation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1301-1314.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amiri, Mojtaba Maali & Shadman, Milad & Estefen, Segen F., 2024. "A review of physical and numerical modeling techniques for horizontal-axis wind turbine wakes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Ziyu Zhang & Peng Huang & Haocheng Sun, 2020. "A Novel Analytical Wake Model with a Cosine-Shaped Velocity Deficit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Zheng, Jiancai & Wang, Nina & Wan, Decheng & Strijhak, Sergei, 2023. "Numerical investigations of coupled aeroelastic performance of wind turbines by elastic actuator line model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PB).
    4. Pollini, Nicolò, 2022. "Topology optimization of wind farm layouts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1015-1027.
    5. Jiufa Cao & Weijun Zhu & Xinbo Wu & Tongguang Wang & Haoran Xu, 2018. "An Aero-acoustic Noise Distribution Prediction Methodology for Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Archer, Cristina L. & Vasel-Be-Hagh, Ahmadreza & Yan, Chi & Wu, Sicheng & Pan, Yang & Brodie, Joseph F. & Maguire, A. Eoghan, 2018. "Review and evaluation of wake loss models for wind energy applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1187-1207.
    7. Zhang, Ziyu & Huang, Peng, 2023. "Prediction of multiple-wake velocity and wind power using a cosine-shaped wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    8. Yang, Kun & Deng, Xiaowei & Ti, Zilong & Yang, Shanghui & Huang, Senbin & Wang, Yuhang, 2023. "A data-driven layout optimization framework of large-scale wind farms based on machine learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    9. Jirarote Buranarote & Yutaka Hara & Masaru Furukawa & Yoshifumi Jodai, 2022. "Method to Predict Outputs of Two-Dimensional VAWT Rotors by Using Wake Model Mimicking the CFD-Created Flow Field," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-29, July.
    10. Ling, Ziyan & Zhao, Zhenzhou & Liu, Yige & Liu, Huiwen & Ali, Kashif & Liu, Yan & Wen, Yifan & Wang, Dingding & Li, Shijun & Su, Chunhao, 2024. "Multi-objective layout optimization for wind farms based on non-uniformly distributed turbulence and a new three-dimensional multiple wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Syed Ahmed Kabir, Ijaz Fazil & Safiyullah, Ferozkhan & Ng, E.Y.K. & Tam, Vivian W.Y., 2020. "New analytical wake models based on artificial intelligence and rivalling the benchmark full-rotor CFD predictions under both uniform and ABL inflows," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    12. Dongqin Zhang & Yang Liang & Chao Li & Yiqing Xiao & Gang Hu, 2022. "Applicability of Wake Models to Predictions of Turbine-Induced Velocity Deficit and Wind Farm Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, October.
    13. Cao, Lichao & Ge, Mingwei & Gao, Xiaoxia & Du, Bowen & Li, Baoliang & Huang, Zhi & Liu, Yongqian, 2022. "Wind farm layout optimization to minimize the wake induced turbulence effect on wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    14. Yaqing Jin & Huiwen Liu & Rajan Aggarwal & Arvind Singh & Leonardo P. Chamorro, 2016. "Effects of Freestream Turbulence in a Model Wind Turbine Wake," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-12, October.
    15. Ge, Mingwei & Wu, Ying & Liu, Yongqian & Li, Qi, 2019. "A two-dimensional model based on the expansion of physical wake boundary for wind-turbine wakes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 975-984.
    16. Razi, P. & Ramaprabhu, P. & Tarey, P. & Muglia, M. & Vermillion, C., 2022. "A low-order wake interaction modeling framework for the performance of ocean current turbines under turbulent conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1602-1617.
    17. Ti, Zilong & Deng, Xiao Wei & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "Wake modeling of wind turbines using machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    18. Zehtabiyan-Rezaie, Navid & Abkar, Mahdi, 2024. "An extended k−ɛ model for wake-flow simulation of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    19. Kyoungboo Yang, 2020. "Determining an Appropriate Parameter of Analytical Wake Models for Energy Capture and Layout Optimization on Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "Numerical investigation of the average wind speed of a single wind turbine and development of a novel three-dimensional multiple wind turbine wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 192-203.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:4:p:680-:d:207581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.