IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i22p4350-d287258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualization of CO 2 Terminal for Offshore CCS Using System Engineering Process

Author

Listed:
  • Hyonjeong Noh

    (Offshore Industries R&BD Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Geoje 53201, Korea)

  • Kwangu Kang

    (Offshore Industries R&BD Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Geoje 53201, Korea)

  • Cheol Huh

    (Ocean Science & Technology School, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan 49112, Korea)

  • Seong-Gil Kang

    (Global Cooperation Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Daejeon 34103, Korea)

  • Seong Jong Han

    (Offshore Industries R&BD Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Geoje 53201, Korea)

  • Hyungwoo Kim

    (Offshore Industries R&BD Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Geoje 53201, Korea)

Abstract

In this study, the basic configuration and operation concept of a CO 2 terminal were identified by conducting a system engineering process. The performance goal of a CO 2 terminal was determined by requirement analysis. Then, functions and timelines were derived by functional analysis to meet the performance goal. Equipment to perform the functions were defined and finally, a process flow block diagram of the CO 2 terminal was acquired. The CO 2 terminal in this study consisted of three parts. First, the CO 2 loading/unloading part is responsible for liquid CO 2 unloading from the carrier and loading vapor CO 2 onto the carrier. Secondly, the liquid CO 2 transmission part extracts liquid CO 2 from the storage tanks and increases the pressure until it satisfies the offshore pipeline transportation condition. The vapor-treatment part collects boil-off gas, generates vapor CO 2 , and charges the storage tanks with vapor CO 2 to control the pressure of the storage tanks that discharge liquid CO 2 . Finally, the study results were compared with a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal. The biggest difference between the CO 2 terminal in this study and the LNG terminal is that a vaporizer is essential in the CO 2 terminal due to the smaller storage capacity of the CO 2 terminal and, therefore, the lower amount of boil-off gas.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyonjeong Noh & Kwangu Kang & Cheol Huh & Seong-Gil Kang & Seong Jong Han & Hyungwoo Kim, 2019. "Conceptualization of CO 2 Terminal for Offshore CCS Using System Engineering Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:22:p:4350-:d:287258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/22/4350/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/22/4350/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kwangu Kang & Youngkyun Seo & Daejun Chang & Seong-Gil Kang & Cheol Huh, 2015. "Estimation of CO 2 Transport Costs in South Korea Using a Techno-Economic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Yoo, Byeong-Yong, 2017. "The development and comparison of CO2 BOG re-liquefaction processes for LNG fueled CO2 carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 186-197.
    3. Trotter, Ian M. & Gomes, Marília Fernandes Maciel & Braga, Marcelo José & Brochmann, Bjørn & Lie, Ole Nikolai, 2016. "Optimal LNG (liquefied natural gas) regasification scheduling for import terminals with storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 80-88.
    4. Jung, Jung-Yeul & Huh, Cheol & Kang, Seong-Gil & Seo, Youngkyun & Chang, Daejun, 2013. "CO2 transport strategy and its cost estimation for the offshore CCS in Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1054-1060.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng Chen & Tatiana Morosuk, 2021. "Exergetic and Economic Evaluation of CO 2 Liquefaction Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al Baroudi, Hisham & Awoyomi, Adeola & Patchigolla, Kumar & Jonnalagadda, Kranthi & Anthony, E.J., 2021. "A review of large-scale CO2 shipping and marine emissions management for carbon capture, utilisation and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    2. Lee, Jaejun & Son, Heechang & Oh, Juyoung & Yu, Taejong & Kim, Hyeonuk & Lim, Youngsub, 2024. "Advanced process design of subcooling re-liquefaction system considering storage pressure for a liquefied CO2 carrier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    3. Onyebuchi, V.E. & Kolios, A. & Hanak, D.P. & Biliyok, C. & Manovic, V., 2018. "A systematic review of key challenges of CO2 transport via pipelines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2563-2583.
    4. Charis Ntakolia & Michalis Douloumpekis & Christos Papaleonidas & Violetta Tsiampa & Dimitrios V. Lyridis, 2023. "A Stochastic Modelling and Optimization for the Design of an LNG Refuelling System in the Piraeus Port Region," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 1-32, September.
    5. Golrokh Sani, Ahmad & Najafi, Hamidreza & Azimi, Seyedeh Shakiba, 2022. "Dynamic thermal modeling of the refrigerated liquified CO2 tanker in carbon capture, utilization, and storage chain: A truck transport case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    6. Simon Roussanaly & Han Deng & Geir Skaugen & Truls Gundersen, 2021. "At what Pressure Shall CO 2 Be Transported by Ship? An in-Depth Cost Comparison of 7 and 15 Barg Shipping," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Sergey Fedoseev & Pavel Tcvetkov & Ksenia Sidorova & Andrzej Kraslawski, 2018. "Potential of Russian Regions to Implement CO 2 -Enhanced Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Enbin Liu & Xudong Lu & Daocheng Wang, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage: Status, Progress and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-48, March.
    9. Selosse, Sandrine & Ricci, Olivia, 2017. "Carbon capture and storage: Lessons from a storage potential and localization analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 32-44.
    10. Bilgili, Levent, 2023. "A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Kwangu Kang & Youngkyun Seo & Daejun Chang & Seong-Gil Kang & Cheol Huh, 2015. "Estimation of CO 2 Transport Costs in South Korea Using a Techno-Economic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Bilgili, Levent, 2021. "Comparative assessment of alternative marine fuels in life cycle perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Pospíšil, Jiří & Charvát, Pavel & Arsenyeva, Olga & Klimeš, Lubomír & Špiláček, Michal & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2019. "Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:22:p:4350-:d:287258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.