IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v81y2018ip2p2563-2583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of key challenges of CO2 transport via pipelines

Author

Listed:
  • Onyebuchi, V.E.
  • Kolios, A.
  • Hanak, D.P.
  • Biliyok, C.
  • Manovic, V.

Abstract

Transport of carbon dioxide (CO2) via pipeline from the point of capture to a geologically suitable location for either sequestration or enhanced hydrocarbon recovery is a vital aspect of the carbon capture and storage (CCS) chain. This means of CO2 transport has a number of advantages over other means of CO2 transport, such as truck, rail, and ship. Pipelines ensure continuous transport of CO2 from the capture point to the storage site, which is essential to transport the amount of CO2 captured from the source facilities, such as fossil fuel power plants, operating in a continuous manner. Furthermore, using pipelines is regarded as more economical than other means of CO2 transport

Suggested Citation

  • Onyebuchi, V.E. & Kolios, A. & Hanak, D.P. & Biliyok, C. & Manovic, V., 2018. "A systematic review of key challenges of CO2 transport via pipelines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2563-2583.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:81:y:2018:i:p2:p:2563-2583
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117309942
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ibrahim Ahamada & Djamel Kirat, 2011. "The impact of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme on electricity generation," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-00629900, HAL.
    2. Li, H. & Yan, J., 2009. "Impacts of equations of state (EOS) and impurities on the volume calculation of CO2 mixtures in the applications of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(12), pages 2760-2770, December.
    3. Roddy, Dermot J., 2012. "Development of a CO2 network for industrial emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 459-465.
    4. Kirat, Djamel & Ahamada, Ibrahim, 2011. "The impact of the European Union emission trading scheme on the electricity-generation sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 995-1003, September.
    5. A. Mazzoldi & D. Picard & P.G. Sriram & C.M. Oldenburg, 2013. "Erratum to ‘Simulation‐based estimates of safety distances for pipeline transportation of carbon dioxide’," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 3(4), pages 309-310, August.
    6. Alberto Mazzoldi & David Picard & Papagudi G. Sriram & Curtis M. Oldenburg, 2013. "Simulation‐based estimates of safety distances for pipeline transportation of carbon dioxide," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 66-83, February.
    7. Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    8. van der Zwaan, B.C.C. & Schoots, K. & Rivera-Tinoco, R. & Verbong, G.P.J., 2011. "The cost of pipelining climate change mitigation: An overview of the economics of CH4, CO2 and H2 transportation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3821-3831.
    9. Brown, S. & Beck, J. & Mahgerefteh, H. & Fraga, E.S., 2013. "Global sensitivity analysis of the impact of impurities on CO2 pipeline failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 43-54.
    10. Nykvist, Björn, 2013. "Ten times more difficult: Quantifying the carbon capture and storage challenge," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 683-689.
    11. Ibrahim Ahamada & Djamel Kirat, 2011. "The impact of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme on electricity generation," Post-Print hal-00629900, HAL.
    12. Viebahn, Peter & Vallentin, Daniel & Höller, Samuel, 2014. "Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in India’s power sector – An integrated assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 62-75.
    13. Gale, John & Davison, John, 2004. "Transmission of CO2—safety and economic considerations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1319-1328.
    14. Hamelinck, C.N & Faaij, A.P.C & Turkenburg, W.C & van Bergen, F & Pagnier, H.J.M & Barzandji, O.H.M & Wolf, K.-H.A.A & Ruijg, G.J, 2002. "CO2 enhanced coalbed methane production in the Netherlands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 647-674.
    15. Belaissaoui, Bouchra & Cabot, Gilles & Cabot, Marie-Sophie & Willson, David & Favre, Eric, 2012. "An energetic analysis of CO2 capture on a gas turbine combining flue gas recirculation and membrane separation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 167-175.
    16. Ibrahim Ahamada & Djamel Kirat, 2011. "The impact of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme on electricity generation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00629900, HAL.
    17. Jung, Jung-Yeul & Huh, Cheol & Kang, Seong-Gil & Seo, Youngkyun & Chang, Daejun, 2013. "CO2 transport strategy and its cost estimation for the offshore CCS in Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1054-1060.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simonsen, Kenneth René & Hansen, Dennis Severin & Pedersen, Simon, 2024. "Challenges in CO2 transportation: Trends and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Sun, Haofei & Wang, Haoxiang & Zeng, Yimin & Liu, Jing, 2023. "Corrosion challenges in supercritical CO2 transportation, storage, and utilization—a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Hon Chung Lau & Seeram Ramakrishna & Kai Zhang & Mohamed Ziaudeen Shahul Hameed, 2021. "A Decarbonization Roadmap for Singapore and Its Energy Policy Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Zhang, Shuai & Zhuang, Yu & Liu, Linlin & Zhang, Lei & Du, Jian, 2019. "Risk management optimization framework for the optimal deployment of carbon capture and storage system under uncertainty," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Anoop Kumar Shukla & Zoheb Ahmad & Meeta Sharma & Gaurav Dwivedi & Tikendra Nath Verma & Siddharth Jain & Puneet Verma & Ali Zare, 2020. "Advances of Carbon Capture and Storage in Coal-Based Power Generating Units in an Indian Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Oghare Victor Ogidiama & Tariq Shamim, 2021. "Assessment of CO2 capture technologies for CO2 utilization in enhanced oil recovery," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 432-444, June.
    7. McLaughlin, Hope & Littlefield, Anna A. & Menefee, Maia & Kinzer, Austin & Hull, Tobias & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Kim, Jinsoo & Griffiths, Steven, 2023. "Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    8. Chang, Yuan & Gao, Siqi & Ma, Qian & Wei, Ying & Li, Guoping, 2024. "Techno-economic analysis of carbon capture and utilization technologies and implications for China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    9. Sinha, Rakesh Kumar & Chaturvedi, Nitin Dutt, 2019. "A review on carbon emission reduction in industries and planning emission limits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Kontou, V. & Grimekis, D. & Braimakis, K. & Karellas, S., 2022. "Techno-economic assessment of dimethyl carbonate production based on carbon capture and utilization and power-to-fuel technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    11. Wang, Honglin & Liu, Yanrong & Laaksonen, Aatto & Krook-Riekkola, Anna & Yang, Zhuhong & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2020. "Carbon recycling – An immense resource and key to a smart climate engineering: A survey of technologies, cost and impurity impact," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Enbin Liu & Xudong Lu & Daocheng Wang, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage: Status, Progress and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-48, March.
    13. Jiang, Kai & Ashworth, Peta & Zhang, Shiyi & Hu, Guoping, 2022. "Print media representations of carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) technology in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Kyriaki Kelektsoglou, 2018. "Carbon Capture and Storage: A Review of Mineral Storage of CO 2 in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Salvatore F. Cannone & Andrea Lanzini & Massimo Santarelli, 2021. "A Review on CO 2 Capture Technologies with Focus on CO 2 -Enhanced Methane Recovery from Hydrates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-32, January.
    16. Marcelo Azevedo Benetti & Florin Iov, 2023. "A Novel Scheme to Allocate the Green Energy Transportation Costs—Application to Carbon Captured and Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Li, M.W., 2014. "An integrated optimization modeling approach for planning emission trading and clean-energy development under uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 31-46.
    2. Teng, Fei & Wang, Xin & Zhiqiang, LV, 2014. "Introducing the emissions trading system to China’s electricity sector: Challenges and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 39-45.
    3. Abrell, Jan & Kosch, Mirjam & Rausch, Sebastian, 2022. "How effective is carbon pricing?—A machine learning approach to policy evaluation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. George Daskalakis, Lazaros Symeonidis, Raphael N. Markellos, 2015. "Electricity futures prices in an emissions constrained economy: Evidence from European power markets," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    5. Bersani, Alberto M. & Falbo, Paolo & Mastroeni, Loretta, 2022. "Is the ETS an effective environmental policy? Undesired interaction between energy-mix, fuel-switch and electricity prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    6. Feng Liu & Tao Lv & Yuan Meng & Xiaoran Hou & Jie Xu & Xu Deng, 2022. "Low-Carbon Transition Paths of Coal Power in China’s Provinces under the Context of the Carbon Trading Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Gavard, Claire & Kirat, Djamel, 2018. "Flexibility in the market for international carbon credits and price dynamics difference with European allowances," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 504-518.
    8. Frieder Mokinski & Nikolas Wölfing, 2014. "The effect of regulatory scrutiny: Asymmetric cost pass-through in power wholesale and its end," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 175-193, April.
    9. Leroutier, Marion, 2022. "Carbon pricing and power sector decarbonization: Evidence from the UK," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    10. Andrianesis, Panagiotis & Biskas, Pandelis & Liberopoulos, George, 2021. "Evaluating the cost of emissions in a pool-based electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    11. Rübbelke, Dirk & Vögele, Stefan, 2013. "Effects of carbon dioxide capture and storage in Germany on European electricity exchange and welfare," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 582-588.
    12. Wang, Xue-Chao & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Wang, Yutao & Foley, Aoife & Huisingh, Donald & Guan, Dabo & Dong, Xiaobin & Varbanov, Petar Sabev, 2021. "Unsustainable imbalances and inequities in Carbon-Water-Energy flows across the EU27," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    13. Xie, Li & Zhou, Zhichao & Hui, Shimin, 2022. "Does environmental regulation improve the structure of power generation technology? Evidence from China's pilot policy on the carbon emissions trading market(CETM)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Hanif, Waqas & Arreola Hernandez, Jose & Mensi, Walid & Kang, Sang Hoon & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Yoon, Seong-Min, 2021. "Nonlinear dependence and connectedness between clean/renewable energy sector equity and European emission allowance prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. Knaut, Andreas & Tode, Christian & Lindenberger, Dietmar & Malischek, Raimund & Paulus, Simon & Wagner, Johannes, 2016. "The reference forecast of the German energy transition—An outlook on electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 477-491.
    16. Paolo Falbo & Cristian Pelizzari & Luca Taschini, 2019. "Renewables, Allowances Markets, and Capacity Expansion in Energy-Only Markets," The Energy Journal, , vol. 40(6), pages 41-78, November.
    17. Zhou, Fengxiu & Wang, Xiaoyu, 2022. "The carbon emissions trading scheme and green technology innovation in China: A new structural economics perspective," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 365-381.
    18. Tang, Ling & Wang, Haohan & Li, Ling & Yang, Kaitong & Mi, Zhifu, 2020. "Quantitative models in emission trading system research: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Golombek, Rolf & Kittelsen, Sverre A.C. & Rosendahl, Knut Einar, 2013. "Price and welfare effects of emission quota allocation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 568-580.
    20. Djamel Kirat & Ibrahim Ahamada, 2016. "Evidence for threshold eff​ects in the pass-through of carbon prices to wholesale electricity prices," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(4), pages 2350-2364.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:81:y:2018:i:p2:p:2563-2583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.