IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i14p2659-d247421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Ecosystem Design: An Evaluation Model to Support the Choice of Eco-Compatible Technological Solutions for Residential Building

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Rosaria Guarini

    (Department of Architecture and Design, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Pierluigi Morano

    (Department of Science of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Francesco Sica

    (Doctoral School of Architecture and Construction, Department of Architecture and Design, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00196 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The technological components regarding building cladding are designed for ensuring thermo-hygrometric comfort conditions within habitable spaces and realising smart buildings. Often the solutions adopted are identified referring only to the characteristics of mechanical and energy materials without considering the ecological–environmental properties in an urban context. Thus, it is appropriate to choose technological components not only according to material type, but also ecological aspects pursued through presence and/or structured integration of natural elements. The technical-design forms based on “building–nature” integration allows, on one hand, the sustainable soil use with multiple benefits (ecosystem services) that natural systems produce, on the other hand, the identification of technological solutions sized referring environmental quality levels achieved through appropriate natural species use. In this way, it can be obtained lower buildings investment and maintenance costs, and greater energetic–environmental benefits. So, it is proposed an evaluation protocol for settlement transformation interventions structured considering environmental effects obtained with Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs) into the project. According to ecological–environmental quality level achieved with NBSs, the technological component is sized according to preliminary design parameters (noise reduction and solar irradiation degree) obtained through NBSs. The total performance level of technological solutions is expressed using Economic–Environmental Indicators. The protocol is tested on social housing case in Anagnina district of Rome (Italy).

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Rosaria Guarini & Pierluigi Morano & Francesco Sica, 2019. "Integrated Ecosystem Design: An Evaluation Model to Support the Choice of Eco-Compatible Technological Solutions for Residential Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-34, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:14:p:2659-:d:247421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2659/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2659/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Nesticò & Maria Rosaria Guarini & Pierluigi Morano & Francesco Sica, 2019. "An Economic Analysis Algorithm for Urban Forestry Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Abu Bakar, Nur Najihah & Hassan, Mohammad Yusri & Abdullah, Hayati & Rahman, Hasimah Abdul & Abdullah, Md Pauzi & Hussin, Faridah & Bandi, Masilah, 2015. "Energy efficiency index as an indicator for measuring building energy performance: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Antonio Nesticò & Francesco Sica, 2017. "The sustainability of urban renewal projects: a model for economic multi-criteria analysis," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(4), pages 397-409, July.
    4. Fabrizio Battisti & Maria Rosaria Guarini, 2017. "Public interest evaluation in negotiated public-private partnership," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 54-89.
    5. May, Gökan & Barletta, Ilaria & Stahl, Bojan & Taisch, Marco, 2015. "Energy management in production: A novel method to develop key performance indicators for improving energy efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 46-61.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Rosaria Guarini & Pierluigi Morano & Francesco Sica, 2020. "Historical School Buildings. A Multi-Criteria Approach for Urban Sustainable Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Adolpho Guido de Araújo & Arnaldo Manoel Pereira Carneiro & Rachel Perez Palha, 2020. "Predictive Methodology for the Quantification of Environmental Aspects in Urban Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Yuan Zhao & Tian Zhang & Ting Wu & Shujing Xu & Shuwang Yang, 2021. "Effects of Technological Progress from Different Sources on Haze Pollution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo & Mengyi Ruan & Eiei Htwe & Motoshi Hiratsuka & Alan Dwi Wibowo & Yuji Nagai & Hiroshi Onoda, 2020. "Estimating the Energy Demand and Growth in Off-Grid Villages: Case Studies from Myanmar, Indonesia, and Laos," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Cristina Coscia & Subhash Mukerjee & Bianca Ludovica Palmieri & Chiara Quintanal Rivacoba, 2020. "Enhancing the Sustainability of Social Housing Policies through the Social Impact Approach: Innovative Perspectives form a “Paris Affordable Housing Challenge” Project in France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Iván Acosta-Pazmiño & Carlos Rivera-Solorio & Miguel Gijón-Rivera, 2020. "Energetic and Economic Analyses of an LCPV/T Solar Hybrid Plant for a Sports Center Building in Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qingbin Wang & Laurel Valchuis & Ethan Thompson & David Conner & Robert Parsons, 2019. "Consumer Support and Willingness to Pay for Electricity from Solar, Wind, and Cow Manure in the United States: Evidence from a Survey in Vermont," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Antonio Nesticò & Piera Somma, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Methods for the Enhancement of Historical Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Jessica K. Breadsell & Joshua J. Byrne & Gregory M. Morrison, 2019. "Household Energy and Water Practices Change Post-Occupancy in an Australian Low-Carbon Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Maria Rosaria Sessa & Benedetta Esposito & Daniela Sica & Ornella Malandrino, 2021. "A Logical-Mathematical Approach for the Implementation of Ecologically Equipped Productive Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Kunyuan Wanghe & Xinle Guo & Xiaofeng Luan & Kai Li, 2019. "Assessment of Urban Green Space Based on Bio-Energy Landscape Connectivity: A Case Study on Tongzhou District in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Sarnataro, Michele & Barbati, Maria & Greco, Salvatore, 2021. "A portfolio approach for the selection and the timing of urban planning projects," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Balitskiy, Sergey & Bilan, Yuriy & Strielkowski, Wadim & Štreimikienė, Dalia, 2016. "Energy efficiency and natural gas consumption in the context of economic development in the European Union," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 156-168.
    8. Mustaffa, Nur Kamaliah & Kudus, Sakhiah Abdul, 2022. "Challenges and way forward towards best practices of energy efficient building in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    9. Matteo Piccioni & Fabrizio Martini & Chiara Martini & Claudia Toro, 2024. "Evaluation of Energy Performance Indicators and Energy Saving Opportunities for the Italian Rubber Manufacturing Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Perroni, Marcos G. & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Vieira da Silva, Wesley & Tortato, Ubiratã, 2018. "Measuring energy performance: A process based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 540-553.
    11. Ioannis Charalampidis & Panagiotis Karkatsoulis & Pantelis Capros, 2019. "A Regional Economy-Energy-Transport Model of the EU for Assessing Decarbonization in Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-27, August.
    12. Gibb, Duncan & Johnson, Maike & Romaní, Joaquim & Gasia, Jaume & Cabeza, Luisa F. & Seitz, Antje, 2018. "Process integration of thermal energy storage systems – Evaluation methodology and case studies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 750-760.
    13. Wang, Yang & Kuckelkorn, Jens & Li, Daoliang & Du, Jiangtao, 2018. "Evaluation on distributed renewable energy system integrated with a Passive House building using a new energy performance index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 81-89.
    14. Salvatori, Simone & Benedetti, Miriam & Bonfà, Francesca & Introna, Vito & Ubertini, Stefano, 2018. "Inter-sectorial benchmarking of compressed air generation energy performance: Methodology based on real data gathering in large and energy-intensive industrial firms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 266-280.
    15. Tullio de Rubeis & Annamaria Ciccozzi & Letizia Giusti & Dario Ambrosini, 2022. "The 3D Printing Potential for Heat Flow Optimization: Influence of Block Geometries on Heat Transfer Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Pedro Roquet & Gustavo Raush & Luis Javier Berne & Pedro-Javier Gamez-Montero & Esteban Codina, 2022. "Energy Key Performance Indicators for Mobile Machinery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Amir Abolhassani & Gale Boyd & Majid Jaridi & Bhaskaran Gopalakrishnan & James Harner, 2023. "“Is Energy That Different from Labor?” Similarity in Determinants of Intensity for Auto Assembly Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-35, February.
    18. Rosaura Castrillón Mendoza & Javier M. Rey Hernández & Eloy Velasco Gómez & Julio F. San José Alonso & Francisco J. Rey Martínez, 2018. "Analysis of the Methodology to Obtain Several Key Indicators Performance (KIP), by Energy Retrofitting of the Actual Building to the District Heating Fuelled by Biomass, Focusing on nZEB Goal: Case of," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Gonçalo Santinha & Teresa Carvalho & Teresa Forte & Alexandre Fernandes & Jéssica Tavares, 2021. "Profiling Public Sector Choice: Perceptions and Motivational Determinants at the Pre-Entry Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo, 2021. "The Assessment of Density Bonus in Building Renovation Interventions. The Case of the City of Florence in Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:14:p:2659-:d:247421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.