IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i4p1364-d748866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Key Performance Indicators for Mobile Machinery

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Roquet

    (ROQCAR SL, Antonio Figueras 68, 08551 Tona, Spain)

  • Gustavo Raush

    (CATMech, Department of Fluid Mechanics, Technical University of Catalonia, Colom 7, 08222 Terrassa, Spain)

  • Luis Javier Berne

    (IHBER, Polígono Malpica, Calle F, Nave 65, 50016 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Pedro-Javier Gamez-Montero

    (CATMech, Department of Fluid Mechanics, Technical University of Catalonia, Colom 7, 08222 Terrassa, Spain)

  • Esteban Codina

    (CATMech, Department of Fluid Mechanics, Technical University of Catalonia, Colom 7, 08222 Terrassa, Spain)

Abstract

Mobile machinery manufacturers must face and deal with reducing fuel consumption, rising prices, and environmental pollution. The development of methods to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the energy performance of hydraulically actuated systems has become a priority for researchers and OEMs, Original Equipment Manufacturers. In this paper, a new methodology that is based on Key Performance Indicators, KPI, is proposed with different goals: (i) to evaluate the energy performance and the monitoring of its evolution in the different stages of its life cycle (design, commissioning, optimization, retrofit, etc.); (ii) compare the energy levels between machines of different sizes and different brands in a benchmarking process; and (iii) establish a database that is state of the art, which facilitates setting achievable goals or limits for improvement. These KPI values can be deduced simply from the energy balances that were made from the experimental study of various machines over a relatively long period. This methodology has been applied to typical hydraulic systems for lifting and lowering loads that are used in a wide variety of mobile machines of different mechanical designs and sizes. Still, it can be included in the generic name of “loaders”. A KPI’s values for the three machines are presented in a dashboard as a decision-making tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Roquet & Gustavo Raush & Luis Javier Berne & Pedro-Javier Gamez-Montero & Esteban Codina, 2022. "Energy Key Performance Indicators for Mobile Machinery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1364-:d:748866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1364/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1364/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Javier Berne & Gustavo Raush & Pedro Javier Gamez-Montero & Pedro Roquet & Esteban Codina, 2021. "Multi-Point-of-View Energy Loss Analysis in a Refuse Truck Hydraulic System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, May.
    2. May, Gökan & Barletta, Ilaria & Stahl, Bojan & Taisch, Marco, 2015. "Energy management in production: A novel method to develop key performance indicators for improving energy efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 46-61.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis Javier Berne & Gustavo Raush & Pedro Roquet & Pedro-Javier Gamez-Montero & Esteban Codina, 2022. "Graphic Method to Evaluate Power Requirements of a Hydraulic System Using Load-Holding Valves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matteo Piccioni & Fabrizio Martini & Chiara Martini & Claudia Toro, 2024. "Evaluation of Energy Performance Indicators and Energy Saving Opportunities for the Italian Rubber Manufacturing Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Sun, Jingchao & Na, Hongming & Yan, Tianyi & Che, Zichang & Qiu, Ziyang & Yuan, Yuxing & Li, Yingnan & Du, Tao & Song, Yanli & Fang, Xin, 2022. "Cost-benefit assessment of manufacturing system using comprehensive value flow analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    3. Alessandro Franco & Lorenzo Miserocchi & Daniele Testi, 2023. "Energy Indicators for Enabling Energy Transition in Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Ganjehkaviri, A. & Mohd Jaafar, M.N. & Hosseini, S.E. & Barzegaravval, H., 2017. "Genetic algorithm for optimization of energy systems: Solution uniqueness, accuracy, Pareto convergence and dimension reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 167-177.
    5. Perroni, Marcos G. & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Vieira da Silva, Wesley & Tortato, Ubiratã, 2018. "Measuring energy performance: A process based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 540-553.
    6. Gibb, Duncan & Johnson, Maike & Romaní, Joaquim & Gasia, Jaume & Cabeza, Luisa F. & Seitz, Antje, 2018. "Process integration of thermal energy storage systems – Evaluation methodology and case studies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 750-760.
    7. Salvatori, Simone & Benedetti, Miriam & Bonfà, Francesca & Introna, Vito & Ubertini, Stefano, 2018. "Inter-sectorial benchmarking of compressed air generation energy performance: Methodology based on real data gathering in large and energy-intensive industrial firms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 266-280.
    8. Benjie Li & Hualin Zheng & Xiao Yang & Liang Guo & Binglin Li, 2020. "Energy Optimization for Motorized Spindle System of Machine Tools under Minimum Thermal Effects and Maximum Productivity Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Amir Abolhassani & Gale Boyd & Majid Jaridi & Bhaskaran Gopalakrishnan & James Harner, 2023. "“Is Energy That Different from Labor?” Similarity in Determinants of Intensity for Auto Assembly Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-35, February.
    10. Jia, Shun & Yuan, Qinghe & Lv, Jingxiang & Liu, Ying & Ren, Dawei & Zhang, Zhongwei, 2017. "Therblig-embedded value stream mapping method for lean energy machining," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1081-1098.
    11. Adalberto Ospino Castro & Carlos Robles-Algar n & Rafael Pe a Gallardo, 2019. "Analysis of Energy Management and Financial Planning in the Implementation of PV Systems," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11.
    12. Cao, Huajun & Chen, Erheng & Yi, Hao & Li, Hongcheng & Zhu, Linquan & Wen, Xuanhao, 2021. "Multi-level energy efficiency evaluation for die casting workshop based on fog-cloud computing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    13. Cristian Mejia & Yuya Kajikawa, 2021. "The Academic Landscapes of Manufacturing Enterprise Performance and Environmental Sustainability: A Study of Commonalities and Differences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Björn Christensen & Alexander Himme, 2017. "Improving environmental management accounting: how to use statistics to better determine energy consumption," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 227-243, May.
    15. Salahi, Niloofar & Jafari, Mohsen A., 2016. "Energy-Performance as a driver for optimal production planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 88-100.
    16. Wei, Min & Hong, Seung Ho & Alam, Musharraf, 2016. "An IoT-based energy-management platform for industrial facilities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 607-619.
    17. Michela Gallo & Desara Malluta & Adriana Del Borghi & Erica Gagliano, 2024. "A Critical Review on Methodologies for the Energy Benchmarking of Wastewater Treatment Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Anne Immonen & Maria Kopsakangas-Savolainen, 2022. "Capturing Consumers’ Awareness and the Intention to Support Carbon Neutrality through Energy Efficient Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    19. May, Gökan & Stahl, Bojan & Taisch, Marco, 2016. "Energy management in manufacturing: Toward eco-factories of the future – A focus group study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 628-638.
    20. Favi, Claudio & Marconi, Marco & Mandolini, Marco & Germani, Michele, 2022. "Sustainable life cycle and energy management of discrete manufacturing plants in the industry 4.0 framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1364-:d:748866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.