IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i3p1272-d487024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profiling Public Sector Choice: Perceptions and Motivational Determinants at the Pre-Entry Level

Author

Listed:
  • Gonçalo Santinha

    (Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP), Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Teresa Carvalho

    (Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies (CIPES), Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Teresa Forte

    (Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Alexandre Fernandes

    (Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Jéssica Tavares

    (Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development now guides public administrations in conveying all their functions. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), directly or indirectly, need effective public services and officials for successful implementation. Although working in public entities has been related to ‘a sense of duty and morality’, literature reports that motivation and sense of self-worth among public officials have been declining for many years, which in turn can endanger their performance, diminish their willingness to attend to civic affairs, and become committed to their organisation. Public officials’ motivation has been widely addressed through the lens of public service motivation and public sector motivation. Fewer studies, however, have focused on the factors of choice at a pre-level entry. This paper intends to address this gap by pondering on what influences student’s intention to work in the public sector. Understanding what drives potential future public officials’ motivation is crucial for public service sector effectiveness. Following a case study approach with a sample of 2251 undergraduate and post-graduate students of a Portuguese university, findings show an attribution of similar strengths and shortcomings to public and nonprofit sectors, a more positive perception of the private sector and job stability as the strongest motivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gonçalo Santinha & Teresa Carvalho & Teresa Forte & Alexandre Fernandes & Jéssica Tavares, 2021. "Profiling Public Sector Choice: Perceptions and Motivational Determinants at the Pre-Entry Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1272-:d:487024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1272/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1272/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabrizio Battisti & Maria Rosaria Guarini, 2017. "Public interest evaluation in negotiated public-private partnership," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 54-89.
    2. Sajjad Haider & Guoxian Bao & Gary L. Larsen & Muhammad Umar Draz, 2019. "Harnessing Sustainable Motivation: A Grounded Theory Exploration of Public Service Motivation in Local Governments of the State of Oregon, United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-30, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adriana Z. F. C. Nishimura & Ana Moreira & Maria José Sousa & Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira, 2021. "Weaknesses in Motivation and in Establishing a Meritocratic System: A Portrait of the Portuguese Public Administration," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enrico Fattinnanzi & Giovanna Acampa & Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo & Fabiana Forte, 2020. "Applying the Depreciated Replacement Cost Method When Assessing the Market Value of Public Property Lacking Comparables and Income Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo, 2021. "The Assessment of Density Bonus in Building Renovation Interventions. The Case of the City of Florence in Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Silvia ANGHEL-VLAD & Elena CIZMAS, 2020. "The Impact of Human Resources Management and Technical Investments on Operations Management Performance at SC Arabesque SRL Company," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(3), pages 373-389, July.
    4. Fabrizio Battisti & Maria Rosaria Guarini & Anthea Chiovitti, 2017. "The Assessment of Real Estate Initiatives to Be Included in the Socially-Responsible Funds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Martina Blašková & Dominika Tumová & Rudolf Blaško & Justyna Majchrzak-Lepczyk, 2021. "Spirals of Sustainable Academic Motivation, Creativity, and Trust of Higher Education Staff," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo, 2019. "A Methodology for Determining the Profitability Index of Real Estate Initiatives Involving Public–Private Partnerships. A Case Study: The Integrated Intervention Programs in Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Chich-Ping Hu & Tai-Shan Hu & Peilei Fan & Hai-Ping Lin, 2020. "The Urban Blight Costs in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Maria Rosaria Guarini & Pierluigi Morano & Francesco Sica, 2019. "Integrated Ecosystem Design: An Evaluation Model to Support the Choice of Eco-Compatible Technological Solutions for Residential Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-34, July.
    9. Wei Li & Zhanwei Zhang & Yang Zhou, 2021. "Policy Strategies to Revive Rural Land in Peri-Metropolitan Towns: Resource Identification, Capitalization, and Financialization," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. María Deseada López Subires & Laura Alcaide Muñoz & Andrés Navarro Galera & Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar, 2019. "The Influence of Socio-Demographic Factors on Financial Sustainability of Public Services: A Comparative Analysis in Regional Governments and Local Governments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1272-:d:487024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.