IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v237y2021ics0360544221017369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimisation and planning of biomass supply chain for new and existing power plants based on carbon reduction targets

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Yahya, Nur Syahira
  • Ng, Lik Yin
  • Andiappan, Viknesh

Abstract

The biomass energy sector in most developing countries is not well established due to the high cost of implementation and lack of quantitative planning tools. This paper addresses this issue by presenting a quantitative planning tool used to plan and optimise biomass supply chains based on carbon reduction targets. The tool proposed in this work centres on three important stages: Carbon Emission Pinch Analysis (CEPA), mathematical optimisation, and multi-stakeholder analysis. CEPA is used to determine the minimum amount of biomass to achieve carbon reductions. Then, mathematical optimisation is used to optimise the biomass supply chain based on the carbon reduction target. The optimisation step considers the use of new biomass power plants and co-firing existing power plants. Following this, the importance of power plants within the optimal biomass supply chain is identified using a multi-stakeholder analysis method known as Shapley-Shubik power index. Shapley-Shubik power index is used to determine the level of power held by each power plant in the biomass supply chain based on the number of times each stakeholder become pivotal in achieving several quotas (i.e., power purchase agreement). A case study comprising a biomass supply chain in Malaysia is solved to demonstrate the presented tool. The case study analyses several scenarios in which the biomass supply chain can be deployed. Case study results indicated that co-firing existing power plants did indeed minimise capital and operating expenditure. Conversely, the cost of transporting biomass may be high depending on the location of these plants. Boiler systems were the most chosen due to their high biomass-to-power conversion rates. The multi-stakeholder analysis determined that a power plant with higher power output, cheaper costs, and superior biomass-to-power conversion rate often appears as the more significant player in the supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Yahya, Nur Syahira & Ng, Lik Yin & Andiappan, Viknesh, 2021. "Optimisation and planning of biomass supply chain for new and existing power plants based on carbon reduction targets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:237:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221017369
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221017369
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Sin Cherng & Sum Ng, Denny Kok & Yee Foo, Dominic Chwan & Tan, Raymond R., 2009. "Extended pinch targeting techniques for carbon-constrained energy sector planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 60-67, January.
    2. De Meyer, Annelies & Cattrysse, Dirk & Van Orshoven, Jos, 2015. "A generic mathematical model to optimise strategic and tactical decisions in biomass-based supply chains (OPTIMASS)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 247-264.
    3. Fadly, Dalia, 2019. "Low-carbon transition: Private sector investment in renewable energy projects in developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 552-569.
    4. Atkins, Martin J. & Morrison, Andrew S. & Walmsley, Michael R.W., 2010. "Carbon Emissions Pinch Analysis (CEPA) for emissions reduction in the New Zealand electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 982-987, March.
    5. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J., 2015. "Achieving 33% renewable electricity generation by 2020 in California," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 260-269.
    6. Jayne Lois G. San Juan & Kathleen B. Aviso & Raymond R. Tan & Charlle L. Sy, 2019. "A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for the Design of Biomass Co-Firing Networks Integrating Feedstock Quality Considerations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2020. "Bi-objective optimization of biomass supply chains considering carbon pricing policies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    8. Channing Arndt & Doug Arent & Faaiqa Hartley & Bruno Merven & Alam Hossain Mondal, 2019. "Faster Than You Think: Renewable Energy and Developing Countries," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 149-168, October.
    9. Sangpil Ko & Pasi Lautala, 2018. "Optimal Level of Woody Biomass Co-Firing with Coal Power Plant Considering Advanced Feedstock Logistics System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Basu, Prabir & Butler, James & Leon, Mathias A., 2011. "Biomass co-firing options on the emission reduction and electricity generation costs in coal-fired power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 282-288.
    11. Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2007. "Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained energy sector planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1422-1429.
    12. Saghaei, Mahsa & Ghaderi, Hadi & Soleimani, Hamed, 2020. "Design and optimization of biomass electricity supply chain with uncertainty in material quality, availability and market demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    13. Crilly, Damien & Zhelev, Toshko, 2008. "Emissions targeting and planning: An application of CO2 emissions pinch analysis (CEPA) to the Irish electricity generation sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1498-1507.
    14. Aviso, K.B. & Sy, C.L. & Tan, R.R. & Ubando, A.T., 2020. "Fuzzy optimization of carbon management networks based on direct and indirect biomass co-firing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    15. Li, Zhiwei & Jia, Xiaoping & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2016. "Minimizing carbon footprint using pinch analysis: The case of regional renewable electricity planning in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1051-1062.
    16. Ling, Wen Choong & Verasingham, Arati Banu & Andiappan, Viknesh & Wan, Yoke Kin & Chew, Irene M.L. & Ng, Denny K.S., 2019. "An integrated mathematical optimisation approach to synthesise and analyse a bioelectricity supply chain network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 554-571.
    17. Shapley, L. S. & Shubik, Martin, 1954. "A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 787-792, September.
    18. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Wu, Bingqing & Paudel, Krishna P., 2019. "Modeling and optimization of a supply chain of renewable biomass and biogas: Processing plant location," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 343-355.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gezen, Mesliha & Karaaslan, Abdulkerim, 2022. "Energy planning based on Vision-2023 of Turkey with a goal programming under fuzzy multi-objectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    2. Santibañez-Aguilar, José Ezequiel & Quiroz-Ramírez, Juan José & Sánchez-Ramírez, Eduardo & Segovia-Hernández, Juan Gabriel & Flores-Tlacuahuac, Antonio & Ponce-Ortega, José María, 2022. "Marginalization index as social measure for Acetone-Butanol-Ethanol supply chain planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Fragkoulis Psathas & Paraskevas N. Georgiou & Athanasios Rentizelas, 2022. "Optimizing the Design of a Biomass-to-Biofuel Supply Chain Network Using a Decentralized Processing Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lopez, Neil Stephen A. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2021. "Optimizing regional electricity trading with Carbon Emissions Pinch Analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. de Lira Quaresma, Ana Carolina & Francisco, Flávio S. & Pessoa, Fernando L.P. & Queiroz, Eduardo M., 2018. "Carbon emission reduction in the Brazilian electricity sector using Carbon Sources Diagram," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 134-150.
    3. Nair, Purusothmn Nair S Bhasker & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2022. "Extended graphical approach for the implementation of energy-consuming negative emission technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Lee, Jui-Yuan, 2017. "A multi-period optimisation model for planning carbon sequestration retrofits in the electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 12-20.
    5. Rok Gomilšek & Lidija Čuček & Marko Homšak & Raymond R. Tan & Zdravko Kravanja, 2020. "Carbon Emissions Constrained Energy Planning for Aluminum Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Jui-Yuan Lee & Han-Fu Lin, 2019. "Multi-Footprint Constrained Energy Sector Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Krishna Priya, G.S. & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2017. "Multi-objective pinch analysis for power system planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 335-347.
    8. Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Jia, Xuexiu, 2018. "New directions in the implementation of Pinch Methodology (PM)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 439-468.
    9. Nair, Purusothmn Nair S. Bhasker & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2021. "A generic algebraic targeting approach for integration of renewable energy sources, CO2 capture and storage and negative emission technologies in carbon-constrained energy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. Tan, Raymond R., 2011. "A general source-sink model with inoperability constraints for robust energy sector planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3759-3764.
    11. Kong, Karen Gah Hie & How, Bing Shen & Lim, Juin Yau & Leong, Wei Dong & Teng, Sin Yong & Ng, Wendy Pei Qin & Moser, Irene & Sunarso, Jaka, 2022. "Shaving electric bills with renewables? A multi-period pinch-based methodology for energy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    12. Li, Zhiwei & Jia, Xiaoping & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2016. "Minimizing carbon footprint using pinch analysis: The case of regional renewable electricity planning in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1051-1062.
    13. Yu, Dongwei & Tan, Hongwei, 2016. "Application of ‘potential carbon’ in energy planning with carbon emission constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 363-369.
    14. Liang, Sai & Zhang, Tianzhu, 2011. "Managing urban energy system: A case of Suzhou in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2910-2918, May.
    15. Keivan Nemati-Amirkolaii & Hedi Romdhana & Marie-Laure Lameloise, 2019. "Pinch Methods for Efficient Use of Water in Food Industry: A Survey Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-26, August.
    16. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J. & Kamp, Peter J.J. & Neale, James R., 2014. "Minimising carbon emissions and energy expended for electricity generation in New Zealand through to 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 656-665.
    17. Sinha, Rakesh Kumar & Chaturvedi, Nitin Dutt, 2019. "A review on carbon emission reduction in industries and planning emission limits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J., 2015. "Achieving 33% renewable electricity generation by 2020 in California," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 260-269.
    19. Yang Zhang & Hekun Wang & Taomeizi Zhou & Zhiwei Li & Xiaoping Jia, 2022. "Extended Carbon Emission Pinch Analysis for the Low-Carbon Tobacco Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Al-Mayyahi, Mohmmad A. & Hoadley, Andrew F.A. & Rangaiah, G.P., 2013. "A novel graphical approach to target CO2 emissions for energy resource planning and utility system optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 783-790.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:237:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221017369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.