IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i12p2321-d240612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation-Based Comparison Between the Thermal Behavior of Coaxial and Double U-Tube Borehole Heat Exchangers

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Quaggiotto

    (Department of Industrial Engineering—Applied Physics Section, University of Padova, Via Venezia 1, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Angelo Zarrella

    (Department of Industrial Engineering—Applied Physics Section, University of Padova, Via Venezia 1, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Emmi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering—Applied Physics Section, University of Padova, Via Venezia 1, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Michele De Carli

    (Department of Industrial Engineering—Applied Physics Section, University of Padova, Via Venezia 1, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Luc Pockelé

    (Red Srl, Viale dell’Industria 58/B, 35129 Padova, Italy)

  • Jacques Vercruysse

    (Geogreen sprl, Rue De Priesmont Marbais 63, 1495 Villers La Ville, Belgium)

  • Mario Psyk

    (Rehau AG & Co, Ytterbium 4, 91058 Erlangen-Eltersdorf, Germany)

  • Davide Righini

    (Hydra Srl, Via Imperiale 6, Traghetto di Argenta, 44011 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Antonio Galgaro

    (Department of Geoscience, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo 6, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Dimitrios Mendrinos

    (Centre for Renewable Energy Sources and Saving, Marathonos 19th km, 19009 Pikérmi, Greece)

  • Adriana Bernardi

    (CNR-ISAC, Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35127 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

In this study, the thermal behavior of the coaxial and double U borehole heat exchangers was investigated using numerical simulations in both the long- and short-term. As a reference for borehole heat exchanger specifications, the existing coaxial and double U probes of a geothermal heat pump installed within the Horizon 2020 research project named “Cheap GSHPs” were considered. Nine years of simulations revealed that when borehole heat exchangers are subjected to a balanced thermal load, and intermittent operating modes of the ground source heat pump system are set, the coaxial pipes’ configuration provides better thermal performance due to the higher thermal capacitance of the heat-carrier fluid and the lower borehole thermal resistance. The analysis was conducted considering two different types of ground with different thermal conductivity values. As result, the more conductive ground type highlights the higher yield of the coaxial probe.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Quaggiotto & Angelo Zarrella & Giuseppe Emmi & Michele De Carli & Luc Pockelé & Jacques Vercruysse & Mario Psyk & Davide Righini & Antonio Galgaro & Dimitrios Mendrinos & Adriana Bernardi, 2019. "Simulation-Based Comparison Between the Thermal Behavior of Coaxial and Double U-Tube Borehole Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:12:p:2321-:d:240612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/12/2321/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/12/2321/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zarrella, Angelo & Scarpa, Massimiliano & De Carli, Michele, 2011. "Short time step analysis of vertical ground-coupled heat exchangers: The approach of CaRM," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2357-2367.
    2. Aresti, Lazaros & Christodoulides, Paul & Florides, Georgios, 2018. "A review of the design aspects of ground heat exchangers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 757-773.
    3. Zanchini, E. & Lazzari, S. & Priarone, A., 2010. "Effects of flow direction and thermal short-circuiting on the performance of small coaxial ground heat exchangers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1255-1265.
    4. Paolo Conti, 2016. "Dimensionless Maps for the Validity of Analytical Ground Heat Transfer Models for GSHP Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Zanchini, E. & Lazzari, S. & Priarone, A., 2010. "Improving the thermal performance of coaxial borehole heat exchangers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 657-666.
    6. Acuña, José & Palm, Björn, 2013. "Distributed thermal response tests on pipe-in-pipe borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 312-320.
    7. Marcotte, D. & Pasquier, P., 2008. "On the estimation of thermal resistance in borehole thermal conductivity test," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2407-2415.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quirosa, Gonzalo & Torres, Miguel & Becerra, José A. & Jiménez-Espadafor, Francisco J. & Chacartegui, Ricardo, 2023. "Energy analysis of an ultra-low temperature district heating and cooling system with coaxial borehole heat exchangers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    2. Dai, Jiacheng & Li, Jingbin & Wang, Tianyu & Zhu, Liying & Tian, Kangjian & Chen, Zhaoting, 2023. "Thermal performance analysis of coaxial borehole heat exchanger using liquid ammonia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    3. Hossein Javadi & Javier F. Urchueguia & Seyed Soheil Mousavi Ajarostaghi & Borja Badenes, 2020. "Numerical Study on the Thermal Performance of a Single U-Tube Borehole Heat Exchanger Using Nano-Enhanced Phase Change Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-30, October.
    4. Gianluca Cadelano & Alessandro Bortolin & Giovanni Ferrarini & Paolo Bison & Giorgia Dalla Santa & Eloisa Di Sipio & Adriana Bernardi & Antonio Galgaro, 2021. "Evaluation of the Effect of Anti-Corrosion Coatings on the Thermal Resistance of Ground Heat Exchangers for Shallow Geothermal Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Joanna Piotrowska-Woroniak, 2021. "Assessment of Ground Regeneration around Borehole Heat Exchangers between Heating Seasons in Cold Climates: A Case Study in Bialystok (NE, Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    6. Luka Boban & Dino Miše & Stjepan Herceg & Vladimir Soldo, 2021. "Application and Design Aspects of Ground Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-31, April.
    7. Joanna Piotrowska-Woroniak, 2021. "Determination of the Selected Wells Operational Power with Borehole Heat Exchangers Operating in Real Conditions, Based on Experimental Tests," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Jia, G.S. & Ma, Z.D. & Xia, Z.H. & Zhang, Y.P. & Xue, Y.Z. & Chai, J.C. & Jin, L.W., 2022. "A finite-volume method for full-scale simulations of coaxial borehole heat exchangers with different structural parameters, geological and operating conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 296-313.
    9. Tomasz Sliwa & Kinga Jarosz & Marc A. Rosen & Anna Sojczyńska & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Andrzej Gonet & Karolina Fąfera & Tomasz Kowalski & Martyna Ciepielowska, 2020. "Influence of Rotation Speed and Air Pressure on the Down the Hole Drilling Velocity for Borehole Heat Exchanger Installation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Hongkyo Kim & Yujin Nam & Sangmu Bae & Jae Sang Choi & Sang Bum Kim, 2020. "A Study on the Effect of Performance Factor on GSHP System through Real-Scale Experiments in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Pokhrel, Sajjan & Sasmito, Agus P. & Sainoki, Atsushi & Tosha, Toshiyuki & Tanaka, Tatsuya & Nagai, Chiaki & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Field-scale experimental and numerical analysis of a downhole coaxial heat exchanger for geothermal energy production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 521-535.
    12. Aminhossein Jahanbin & Claudia Naldi & Enzo Zanchini, 2020. "Relation Between Mean Fluid Temperature and Outlet Temperature for Single U-Tube Boreholes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Tomasz Sliwa & Tomasz Kowalski & Dominik Cekus & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa, 2021. "Research on Fresh and Hardened Sealing Slurries with the Addition of Magnesium Regarding Thermal Conductivity for Energy Piles and Borehole Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    14. Aminhossein Jahanbin & Giovanni Semprini & Andrea Natale Impiombato & Cesare Biserni & Eugenia Rossi di Schio, 2020. "Effects of the Circuit Arrangement on the Thermal Performance of Double U-Tube Ground Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Acuña, José & Palm, Björn, 2013. "Distributed thermal response tests on pipe-in-pipe borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 312-320.
    2. Zanchini, Enzo & Lazzari, Stefano & Priarone, Antonella, 2012. "Long-term performance of large borehole heat exchanger fields with unbalanced seasonal loads and groundwater flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 66-77.
    3. Song, Xianzhi & Wang, Gaosheng & Shi, Yu & Li, Ruixia & Xu, Zhengming & Zheng, Rui & Wang, Yu & Li, Jiacheng, 2018. "Numerical analysis of heat extraction performance of a deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1298-1310.
    4. Peng Li & Peng Guan & Jun Zheng & Bin Dou & Hong Tian & Xinsheng Duan & Hejuan Liu, 2020. "Field Test and Numerical Simulation on Heat Transfer Performance of Coaxial Borehole Heat Exchanger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Cimmino, Massimo, 2016. "Fluid and borehole wall temperature profiles in vertical geothermal boreholes with multiple U-tubes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 137-147.
    6. Zanchini, E. & Lazzari, S., 2013. "Temperature distribution in a field of long Borehole Heat Exchangers (BHEs) subjected to a monthly averaged heat flux," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 570-580.
    7. Paul Christodoulides & Ana Vieira & Stanislav Lenart & João Maranha & Gregor Vidmar & Rumen Popov & Aleksandar Georgiev & Lazaros Aresti & Georgios Florides, 2020. "Reviewing the Modeling Aspects and Practices of Shallow Geothermal Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-45, August.
    8. Beier, Richard A. & Spitler, Jeffrey D., 2016. "Weighted average of inlet and outlet temperatures in borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 118-129.
    9. Zanchini, Enzo & Jahanbin, Aminhossein, 2017. "Correlations to determine the mean fluid temperature of double U-tube borehole heat exchangers with a typical geometry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1406-1415.
    10. Quirosa, Gonzalo & Torres, Miguel & Becerra, José A. & Jiménez-Espadafor, Francisco J. & Chacartegui, Ricardo, 2023. "Energy analysis of an ultra-low temperature district heating and cooling system with coaxial borehole heat exchangers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    11. Angelo Zarrella & Giuseppe Emmi & Samantha Graci & Michele De Carli & Matteo Cultrera & Giorgia Dalla Santa & Antonio Galgaro & David Bertermann & Johannes Müller & Luc Pockelé & Giulia Mezzasalma & D, 2017. "Thermal Response Testing Results of Different Types of Borehole Heat Exchangers: An Analysis and Comparison of Interpretation Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Raymond, Jasmin & Lamarche, Louis & Malo, Michel, 2015. "Field demonstration of a first thermal response test with a low power source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 30-39.
    13. Maria Isabel Vélez Márquez & Jasmin Raymond & Daniela Blessent & Mikael Philippe & Nataline Simon & Olivier Bour & Louis Lamarche, 2018. "Distributed Thermal Response Tests Using a Heating Cable and Fiber Optic Temperature Sensing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    14. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    15. Ana Vieira & Maria Alberdi-Pagola & Paul Christodoulides & Saqib Javed & Fleur Loveridge & Frederic Nguyen & Francesco Cecinato & João Maranha & Georgios Florides & Iulia Prodan & Gust Van Lysebetten , 2017. "Characterisation of Ground Thermal and Thermo-Mechanical Behaviour for Shallow Geothermal Energy Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-51, December.
    16. Zhang, Linfeng & Zhang, Quan & Huang, Gongsheng, 2016. "A transient quasi-3D entire time scale line source model for the fluid and ground temperature prediction of vertical ground heat exchangers (GHEs)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 65-75.
    17. Zhang, Linfeng & Zhang, Quan & Huang, Gongsheng & Du, Yaxing, 2014. "A p(t)-linear average method to estimate the thermal parameters of the borehole heat exchangers for in situ thermal response test," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 211-221.
    18. Wilke, Sascha & Menberg, Kathrin & Steger, Hagen & Blum, Philipp, 2020. "Advanced thermal response tests: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Somogyi, Viola & Sebestyén, Viktor & Nagy, Georgina, 2017. "Scientific achievements and regulation of shallow geothermal systems in six European countries – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 934-952.
    20. Claudia Naldi & Enzo Zanchini, 2019. "Full-Time-Scale Fluid-to-Ground Thermal Response of a Borefield with Uniform Fluid Temperature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:12:p:2321-:d:240612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.