IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i9p2317-d167375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis for Wind Turbines Considering Climatic Regions and Comparing Geared and Direct Drive Wind Turbines

Author

Listed:
  • Samet Ozturk

    (Earth and Environmental Engineering Department, Columbia University, 116th St & Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA)

  • Vasilis Fthenakis

    (Earth and Environmental Engineering Department, Columbia University, 116th St & Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA)

  • Stefan Faulstich

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology—IEE, Königstor 59, 34119 Kassel, Germany)

Abstract

The wind industry is looking for ways to accurately predict reliability and availability of newly installed wind turbines. Failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) is a technique utilized to determine the critical subsystems of wind turbines. There are several studies in the literature which have applied FMECA to wind turbines, but no studies so far have used it considering different weather conditions or climatic regions. Furthermore, different wind turbine design types have been analyzed applying FMECA either distinctively or combined, but no study so far has compared the FMECA results for geared and direct-drive wind turbines. We propose to fill these gaps by using Koppen-Geiger climatic regions and two different turbine models of direct-drive and geared-drive concepts. A case study is applied on German wind farms utilizing the Wind Measurement & Evaluation Programme (WMEP) database which contains wind turbine failure data collected between 1989 and 2008. This proposed methodology increases the accuracy of reliability and availability predictions and compares different wind turbine design types and eliminates underestimation of impacts of different weather conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Samet Ozturk & Vasilis Fthenakis & Stefan Faulstich, 2018. "Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis for Wind Turbines Considering Climatic Regions and Comparing Geared and Direct Drive Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:9:p:2317-:d:167375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/9/2317/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/9/2317/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amirat, Y. & Benbouzid, M.E.H. & Al-Ahmar, E. & Bensaker, B. & Turri, S., 2009. "A brief status on condition monitoring and fault diagnosis in wind energy conversion systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2629-2636, December.
    2. Sinha, Y. & Steel, J.A., 2015. "A progressive study into offshore wind farm maintenance optimisation using risk based failure analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 735-742.
    3. Mahmood Shafiee & Fateme Dinmohammadi, 2014. "An FMEA-Based Risk Assessment Approach for Wind Turbine Systems: A Comparative Study of Onshore and Offshore," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Sebastian Pfaffel & Stefan Faulstich & Kurt Rohrig, 2017. "Performance and Reliability of Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, November.
    5. Pierre Tchakoua & René Wamkeue & Mohand Ouhrouche & Fouad Slaoui-Hasnaoui & Tommy Andy Tameghe & Gabriel Ekemb, 2014. "Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: State-of-the-Art Review, New Trends, and Future Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-36, April.
    6. Pinar Pérez, Jesús María & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Tobias, Andrew & Papaelias, Mayorkinos, 2013. "Wind turbine reliability analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 463-472.
    7. Reder, Maik & Yürüşen, Nurseda Y. & Melero, Julio J., 2018. "Data-driven learning framework for associating weather conditions and wind turbine failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 554-569.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhen Wang & Rongxi Wang & Wei Deng & Yong Zhao, 2022. "An Integrated Approach-Based FMECA for Risk Assessment: Application to Offshore Wind Turbine Pitch System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Samet Ozturk & Vasilis Fthenakis, 2020. "Predicting Frequency, Time-To-Repair and Costs of Wind Turbine Failures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Ballabio, Guido & Compare, Michele & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Optimization of the Operation and Maintenance of renewable energy systems by Deep Reinforcement Learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 752-763.
    4. Khalil Touimi & Mohamed Benbouzid & Zhe Chen, 2020. "Optimal Design of a Multibrid Permanent Magnet Generator for a Tidal Stream Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Luca Pinciroli & Piero Baraldi & Guido Ballabio & Michele Compare & Enrico Zio, 2021. "Deep Reinforcement Learning Based on Proximal Policy Optimization for the Maintenance of a Wind Farm with Multiple Crews," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Liu, Min & Qin, Jianjun & Lu, Da-Gang & Zhang, Wei-Heng & Zhu, Jiang-Sheng & Faber, Michael Havbro, 2022. "Towards resilience of offshore wind farms: A framework and application to asset integrity management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    7. Alan Turnbull & Conor McKinnon & James Carrol & Alasdair McDonald, 2022. "On the Development of Offshore Wind Turbine Technology: An Assessment of Reliability Rates and Fault Detection Methods in a Changing Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Qingsong Wang & Yu Wu & Shuangxia Niu & Xing Zhao, 2022. "Advances in Thermal Management Technologies of Electrical Machines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Yuka Kikuchi & Takeshi Ishihara, 2021. "Availability and LCOE Analysis Considering Failure Rate and Downtime for Onshore Wind Turbines in Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Artigao, Estefania & Martín-Martínez, Sergio & Honrubia-Escribano, Andrés & Gómez-Lázaro, Emilio, 2018. "Wind turbine reliability: A comprehensive review towards effective condition monitoring development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1569-1583.
    2. Samet Ozturk & Vasilis Fthenakis & Stefan Faulstich, 2018. "Assessing the Factors Impacting on the Reliability of Wind Turbines via Survival Analysis—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Giovanni Rinaldi & Philipp R. Thies & Lars Johanning, 2021. "Current Status and Future Trends in the Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    4. Mohamed Benbouzid & Tarek Berghout & Nur Sarma & Siniša Djurović & Yueqi Wu & Xiandong Ma, 2021. "Intelligent Condition Monitoring of Wind Power Systems: State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-33, September.
    5. Li, He & Guedes Soares, C, 2022. "Assessment of failure rates and reliability of floating offshore wind turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    6. Pliego Marugán, Alberto & Peco Chacón, Ana María & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro, 2019. "Reliability analysis of detecting false alarms that employ neural networks: A real case study on wind turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Estefania Artigao & Sofia Koukoura & Andrés Honrubia-Escribano & James Carroll & Alasdair McDonald & Emilio Gómez-Lázaro, 2018. "Current Signature and Vibration Analyses to Diagnose an In-Service Wind Turbine Drive Train," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Chen, Xuejun & Yang, Yongming & Cui, Zhixin & Shen, Jun, 2019. "Vibration fault diagnosis of wind turbines based on variational mode decomposition and energy entropy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1100-1109.
    9. Liang, Jinping & Zhang, Ke & Al-Durra, Ahmed & Zhou, Daming, 2020. "A novel fault diagnostic method in power converters for wind power generation system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    10. Stetco, Adrian & Dinmohammadi, Fateme & Zhao, Xingyu & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Barnes, Mike & Keane, John & Nenadic, Goran, 2019. "Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 620-635.
    11. Jijian Lian & Ou Cai & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Yue Zhao, 2019. "Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    12. Cevasco, D. & Koukoura, S. & Kolios, A.J., 2021. "Reliability, availability, maintainability data review for the identification of trends in offshore wind energy applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    13. Fausto Pedro García Marquez & Carlos Quiterio Gómez Muñoz, 2020. "A New Approach for Fault Detection, Location and Diagnosis by Ultrasonic Testing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, March.
    14. Ravi Pandit & Davide Astolfi & Anh Minh Tang & David Infield, 2022. "Sequential Data-Driven Long-Term Weather Forecasting Models’ Performance Comparison for Improving Offshore Operation and Maintenance Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    15. Yang, Zhimin & Chai, Yi, 2016. "A survey of fault diagnosis for onshore grid-connected converter in wind energy conversion systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 345-359.
    16. Ana Rita Nunes & Hugo Morais & Alberto Sardinha, 2021. "Use of Learning Mechanisms to Improve the Condition Monitoring of Wind Turbine Generators: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    17. de Azevedo, Henrique Dias Machado & Araújo, Alex Maurício & Bouchonneau, Nadège, 2016. "A review of wind turbine bearing condition monitoring: State of the art and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 368-379.
    18. Li, He & Diaz, H. & Guedes Soares, C., 2021. "A developed failure mode and effect analysis for floating offshore wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 133-145.
    19. Nacef Tazi & Eric Châtelet & Youcef Bouzidi, 2017. "Using a Hybrid Cost-FMEA Analysis for Wind Turbine Reliability Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Koukoura, Sofia & Scheu, Matti Niclas & Kolios, Athanasios, 2021. "Influence of extended potential-to-functional failure intervals through condition monitoring systems on offshore wind turbine availability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:9:p:2317-:d:167375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.