IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v7y2014i2p619-642d32816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An FMEA-Based Risk Assessment Approach for Wind Turbine Systems: A Comparative Study of Onshore and Offshore

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmood Shafiee

    (Institute for Energy and Resource Technology, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Fateme Dinmohammadi

    (Renewable Energy Organization, and SAIPA Heavy Dies Manufacturing Corporation, Tehran 1386114531, Iran)

Abstract

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) has been extensively used by wind turbine assembly manufacturers for analyzing, evaluating and prioritizing potential/known failure modes. However, several limitations are associated with its practical implementation in wind farms. First, the Risk-Priority-Number (RPN) of a wind turbine system is not informative enough for wind farm managers from the perspective of criticality; second, there are variety of wind turbines with different structures and hence, it is not correct to compare the RPN values of different wind turbines with each other for prioritization purposes; and lastly, some important economical aspects such as power production losses, and the costs of logistics and transportation are not taken into account in the RPN value. In order to overcome these drawbacks, we develop a mathematical tool for risk and failure mode analysis of wind turbine systems (both onshore and offshore) by integrating the aspects of traditional FMEA and some economic considerations. Then, a quantitative comparative study is carried out using the traditional and the proposed FMEA methodologies on two same type of onshore and offshore wind turbine systems. The results show that the both systems face many of the same risks, however there are some main differences worth considering.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmood Shafiee & Fateme Dinmohammadi, 2014. "An FMEA-Based Risk Assessment Approach for Wind Turbine Systems: A Comparative Study of Onshore and Offshore," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:2:p:619-642:d:32816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/2/619/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/2/619/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pinar Pérez, Jesús María & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Tobias, Andrew & Papaelias, Mayorkinos, 2013. "Wind turbine reliability analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 463-472.
    2. Herbert, G.M. Joselin & Iniyan, S. & Goic, Ranko, 2010. "Performance, reliability and failure analysis of wind farm in a developing Country," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2739-2751.
    3. García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Tobias, Andrew Mark & Pinar Pérez, Jesús María & Papaelias, Mayorkinos, 2012. "Condition monitoring of wind turbines: Techniques and methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 169-178.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruiz de la Hermosa González-Carrato, Raúl & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Dimlaye, Vichaar, 2015. "Maintenance management of wind turbines structures via MFCs and wavelet transforms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 472-482.
    2. Cevasco, D. & Koukoura, S. & Kolios, A.J., 2021. "Reliability, availability, maintainability data review for the identification of trends in offshore wind energy applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    3. Artigao, Estefania & Martín-Martínez, Sergio & Honrubia-Escribano, Andrés & Gómez-Lázaro, Emilio, 2018. "Wind turbine reliability: A comprehensive review towards effective condition monitoring development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1569-1583.
    4. Yingying Zhao & Dongsheng Li & Ao Dong & Dahai Kang & Qin Lv & Li Shang, 2017. "Fault Prediction and Diagnosis of Wind Turbine Generators Using SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    5. de Azevedo, Henrique Dias Machado & Araújo, Alex Maurício & Bouchonneau, Nadège, 2016. "A review of wind turbine bearing condition monitoring: State of the art and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 368-379.
    6. Marugán, Alberto Pliego & Márquez, Fausto Pedro García & Perez, Jesus María Pinar & Ruiz-Hernández, Diego, 2018. "A survey of artificial neural network in wind energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1822-1836.
    7. Colak, Ilhami & Fulli, Gianluca & Bayhan, Sertac & Chondrogiannis, Stamatios & Demirbas, Sevki, 2015. "Critical aspects of wind energy systems in smart grid applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 155-171.
    8. Kang, Jichuan & Sun, Liping & Guedes Soares, C., 2019. "Fault Tree Analysis of floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1455-1467.
    9. Li, Jianlan & Zhang, Xuran & Zhou, Xing & Lu, Luyi, 2019. "Reliability assessment of wind turbine bearing based on the degradation-Hidden-Markov model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1076-1087.
    10. Mohammed Dahane & M’hammed Sahnoun & Belgacem Bettayeb & David Baudry & Hamza Boudhar, 2017. "Impact of spare parts remanufacturing on the operation and maintenance performance of offshore wind turbines: a multi-agent approach," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(7), pages 1531-1549, October.
    11. Igba, Joel & Alemzadeh, Kazem & Durugbo, Christopher & Henningsen, Keld, 2015. "Performance assessment of wind turbine gearboxes using in-service data: Current approaches and future trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 144-159.
    12. Romero, Antonio & Soua, Slim & Gan, Tat-Hean & Wang, Bin, 2018. "Condition monitoring of a wind turbine drive train based on its power dependant vibrations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 817-827.
    13. Zuojun Liu & Cheng Xiao & Tieling Zhang & Xu Zhang, 2020. "Research on Fault Detection for Three Types of Wind Turbine Subsystems Using Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Shafiee, Mahmood & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "Maintenance optimization and inspection planning of wind energy assets: Models, methods and strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    15. Yuri Merizalde & Luis Hernández-Callejo & Oscar Duque-Perez & Víctor Alonso-Gómez, 2019. "Maintenance Models Applied to Wind Turbines. A Comprehensive Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-41, January.
    16. Sebastian Pfaffel & Stefan Faulstich & Kurt Rohrig, 2017. "Performance and Reliability of Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, November.
    17. Pliego Marugán, Alberto & Peco Chacón, Ana María & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro, 2019. "Reliability analysis of detecting false alarms that employ neural networks: A real case study on wind turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Alberto Pliego Marugán & Fausto Pedro García Márquez & Jesús María Pinar Pérez, 2016. "Optimal Maintenance Management of Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    19. Estefania Artigao & Sofia Koukoura & Andrés Honrubia-Escribano & James Carroll & Alasdair McDonald & Emilio Gómez-Lázaro, 2018. "Current Signature and Vibration Analyses to Diagnose an In-Service Wind Turbine Drive Train," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Sales-Setién, Ester & Peñarrocha-Alós, Ignacio, 2020. "Robust estimation and diagnosis of wind turbine pitch misalignments at a wind farm level," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1746-1765.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:2:p:619-642:d:32816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.