IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i12p3382-d187389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimising Non-Processing Energy Consumption and Tardiness Fines in a Mixed-Flow Shop

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Peng

    (Institute of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Tao Peng

    (Institute of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Yi Zhang

    (College of Information Science & Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Renzhong Tang

    (Institute of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Luoke Hu

    (Institute of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

Abstract

To meet the increasingly diversified demand of customers, more mixed-flow shops are employed. The flexibility of mixed-flow shops increases the difficulty of scheduling. In this paper, a mixed-flow shop scheduling approach (MFSS) is proposed to minimise the energy consumption and tardiness fine (TF) of production with a special focus on non-processing energy (NPE) reduction. The proposed approach consists of two parts: firstly, a mathematic model is developed to describe how NPE and TF can be determined with a specific schedule; then, a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with multi-chromosomes (MCEAs) is developed to obtain the optimal solutions considering the NPE-TF trade-offs. A deterministic search method with boundary (DSB) and a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA) are employed to validate the developed MCEA. Finally, a case study on an extrusion die mixed-flow shop is performed to demonstrate the proposed approach in industrial practice. Compared with three traditional scheduling approaches, the better performance of the MFSS in terms of computational time and solution quality could be demonstrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Peng & Tao Peng & Yi Zhang & Renzhong Tang & Luoke Hu, 2018. "Minimising Non-Processing Energy Consumption and Tardiness Fines in a Mixed-Flow Shop," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3382-:d:187389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3382/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3382/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hu, Luoke & Peng, Chen & Evans, Steve & Peng, Tao & Liu, Ying & Tang, Renzhong & Tiwari, Ashutosh, 2017. "Minimising the machining energy consumption of a machine tool by sequencing the features of a part," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 292-305.
    2. Gökan May & Bojan Stahl & Marco Taisch & Vittal Prabhu, 2015. "Multi-objective genetic algorithm for energy-efficient job shop scheduling," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(23), pages 7071-7089, December.
    3. Liu, Ying & Dong, Haibo & Lohse, Niels & Petrovic, Sanja, 2016. "A multi-objective genetic algorithm for optimisation of energy consumption and shop floor production performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 259-272.
    4. Yifei Tong & Jingwei Li & Shai Li & Dongbo Li, 2016. "Research on Energy-Saving Production Scheduling Based on a Clustering Algorithm for a Forging Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Bierwirth, C. & Kuhpfahl, J., 2017. "Extended GRASP for the job shop scheduling problem with total weighted tardiness objective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 835-848.
    6. S. M. Mousavi & I. Mahdavi & J. Rezaeian & M. Zandieh, 2018. "An efficient bi-objective algorithm to solve re-entrant hybrid flow shop scheduling with learning effect and setup times," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 123-158, April.
    7. Lvjiang Yin & Xinyu Li & Chao Lu & Liang Gao, 2016. "Energy-Efficient Scheduling Problem Using an Effective Hybrid Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-33, December.
    8. Jia, Shun & Yuan, Qinghe & Lv, Jingxiang & Liu, Ying & Ren, Dawei & Zhang, Zhongwei, 2017. "Therblig-embedded value stream mapping method for lean energy machining," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1081-1098.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen-Yang Cheng & Shih-Wei Lin & Pourya Pourhejazy & Kuo-Ching Ying & Yu-Zhe Lin, 2021. "No-Idle Flowshop Scheduling for Energy-Efficient Production: An Improved Optimization Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Konstantinos Salonitis, 2020. "Energy Efficiency of Manufacturing Processes and Systems—An Introduction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-5, June.
    3. Nailiang Li & Caihong Feng, 2021. "Research on Machining Workshop Batch Scheduling Incorporating the Completion Time and Non-Processing Energy Consumption Considering Product Structure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Junfeng Wang & Zicheng Fei & Qing Chang & Shiqi Li, 2019. "Energy Saving Operation of Manufacturing System Based on Dynamic Adaptive Fuzzy Reasoning Petri Net," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hajo Terbrack & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2021. "Energy-Oriented Production Planning in Industry: A Systematic Literature Review and Classification Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, December.
    2. Shun Jia & Shang Wang & Jingxiang Lv & Wei Cai & Na Zhang & Zhongwei Zhang & Shuowei Bai, 2021. "Multi-Objective Optimization of CNC Turning Process Parameters Considering Transient-Steady State Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Heydar, Mojtaba & Mardaneh, Elham & Loxton, Ryan, 2022. "Approximate dynamic programming for an energy-efficient parallel machine scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 363-380.
    4. Liu, Conghu & Cai, Wei & Dinolov, Ognyan & Zhang, Cuixia & Rao, Weizhen & Jia, Shun & Li, Li & Chan, Felix T.S., 2018. "Emergy based sustainability evaluation of remanufacturing machining systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 670-680.
    5. Anghinolfi, Davide & Paolucci, Massimo & Ronco, Roberto, 2021. "A bi-objective heuristic approach for green identical parallel machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 416-434.
    6. Min Dai & Ziwei Zhang & Adriana Giret & Miguel A. Salido, 2019. "An Enhanced Estimation of Distribution Algorithm for Energy-Efficient Job-Shop Scheduling Problems with Transportation Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, May.
    7. João M. R. C. Fernandes & Seyed Mahdi Homayouni & Dalila B. M. M. Fontes, 2022. "Energy-Efficient Scheduling in Job Shop Manufacturing Systems: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-34, May.
    8. Cai, Wei & Liu, Fei & Dinolov, Ognyan & Xie, Jun & Liu, Peiji & Tuo, Junbo, 2018. "Energy benchmarking rules in machining systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 258-263.
    9. Masmoudi, Oussama & Delorme, Xavier & Gianessi, Paolo, 2019. "Job-shop scheduling problem with energy consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 12-22.
    10. Matthias Gerhard Wichmann & Christoph Johannes & Thomas Stefan Spengler, 2019. "An extension of the general lot-sizing and scheduling problem (GLSP) with time-dependent energy prices," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(5), pages 481-514, July.
    11. Tao Ren & Yan Zhang & Shuenn-Ren Cheng & Chin-Chia Wu & Meng Zhang & Bo-yu Chang & Xin-yue Wang & Peng Zhao, 2020. "Effective Heuristic Algorithms Solving the Jobshop Scheduling Problem with Release Dates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-25, July.
    12. Shun Jia & Qingwen Yuan & Wei Cai & Qinghe Yuan & Conghu Liu & Jingxiang Lv & Zhongwei Zhang, 2018. "Establishment of an Improved Material-Drilling Power Model to Support Energy Management of Drilling Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Beck, Fabian G. & Biel, Konstantin & Glock, Christoph H., 2019. "Integration of energy aspects into the economic lot scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 399-410.
    14. Weiwei Cui & Biao Lu, 2020. "A Bi-Objective Approach to Minimize Makespan and Energy Consumption in Flow Shops with Peak Demand Constraint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Yongmao Xiao & Renqing Zhao & Wei Yan & Xiaoyong Zhu, 2022. "Analysis and Evaluation of Energy Consumption and Carbon Emission Levels of Products Produced by Different Kinds of Equipment Based on Green Development Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Golpîra, Hêriş, 2020. "Smart Energy-Aware Manufacturing Plant Scheduling under Uncertainty: A Risk-Based Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    17. Bürgy, Reinhard & Bülbül, Kerem, 2018. "The job shop scheduling problem with convex costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 82-100.
    18. Panda, Debashish & Ramteke, Manojkumar, 2019. "Preventive crude oil scheduling under demand uncertainty using structure adapted genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 68-82.
    19. Wichmann, Matthias Gerhard & Johannes, Christoph & Spengler, Thomas Stefan, 2019. "Energy-oriented Lot-Sizing and Scheduling considering energy storages," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 204-214.
    20. Murat Gunduz & Ayman Fahmi Naser, 2017. "Cost Based Value Stream Mapping as a Sustainable Construction Tool for Underground Pipeline Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3382-:d:187389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.