IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecnmx/v4y2016i4p48-d84668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Higher Order Bias Correcting Moment Equation for M-Estimation and Its Higher Order Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Kyoo Il Kim

    (Department of Economics, Michigan State University, 486W Circle Dr, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

Abstract

This paper studies an alternative bias correction for the M-estimator, which is obtained by correcting the moment equations in the spirit of Firth (1993). In particular, this paper compares the stochastic expansions of the analytically-bias-corrected estimator and the alternative estimator and finds that the third-order stochastic expansions of these two estimators are identical. This implies that at least in terms of the third-order stochastic expansion, we cannot improve on the simple one-step bias correction by using the bias correction of moment equations. This finding suggests that the comparison between the one-step bias correction and the method of correcting the moment equations or the fully-iterated bias correction should be based on the stochastic expansions higher than the third order.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyoo Il Kim, 2016. "Higher Order Bias Correcting Moment Equation for M-Estimation and Its Higher Order Efficiency," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:4:y:2016:i:4:p:48-:d:84668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/4/4/48/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/4/4/48/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bun, Maurice J.G. & Carree, Martin A., 2005. "Bias-Corrected Estimation in Dynamic Panel Data Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 23, pages 200-210, April.
    2. Whitney K. Newey & Richard J. Smith, 2004. "Higher Order Properties of Gmm and Generalized Empirical Likelihood Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 219-255, January.
    3. Pfanzagl, J. & Wefelmeyer, W., 1978. "A third-order optimum property of the maximum likelihood estimator," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 1-29, March.
    4. Rothenberg, Thomas J., 1984. "Approximating the distributions of econometric estimators and test statistics," Handbook of Econometrics, in: Z. Griliches† & M. D. Intriligator (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 881-935, Elsevier.
    5. Donald W. K. Andrews, 2002. "Higher-Order Improvements of a Computationally Attractive "k"-Step Bootstrap for Extremum Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 119-162, January.
    6. Yang, Zhenlin, 2015. "A general method for third-order bias and variance corrections on a nonlinear estimator," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 178-200.
    7. MacKinnon, James G. & Smith Jr., Anthony A., 1998. "Approximate bias correction in econometrics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 205-230, August.
    8. Jinyong Hahn & Whitney Newey, 2004. "Jackknife and Analytical Bias Reduction for Nonlinear Panel Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1295-1319, July.
    9. Bao, Yong, 2013. "Finite Sample Bias Of The Qmle In Spatial Autoregressive Models – Erratum," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 89-89, February.
    10. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    11. Bao, Yong & Ullah, Aman, 2007. "The second-order bias and mean squared error of estimators in time-series models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 650-669, October.
    12. Bao, Yong, 2013. "Finite-Sample Bias Of The Qmle In Spatial Autoregressive Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 68-88, February.
    13. Newey, Whitney K., 1984. "A method of moments interpretation of sequential estimators," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 14(2-3), pages 201-206.
    14. Bao, Yong & Ullah, Aman, 2007. "Finite sample properties of maximum likelihood estimator in spatial models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 396-413, April.
    15. Rilstone, Paul & Srivastava, V. K. & Ullah, Aman, 1996. "The second-order bias and mean squared error of nonlinear estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 369-395, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shew Fan Liu & Zhenlin Yang, 2015. "Asymptotic Distribution and Finite Sample Bias Correction of QML Estimators for Spatial Error Dependence Model," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-36, May.
    2. Yang, Zhenlin, 2015. "A general method for third-order bias and variance corrections on a nonlinear estimator," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 178-200.
    3. Yang, Zhenlin & Yu, Jihai & Liu, Shew Fan, 2016. "Bias correction and refined inferences for fixed effects spatial panel data models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 52-72.
    4. Demos Antonis & Kyriakopoulou Dimitra, 2019. "Finite-Sample Theory and Bias Correction of Maximum Likelihood Estimators in the EGARCH Model," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Stelios Arvanitis & Antonis Demos, 2015. "A class of indirect inference estimators: higher‐order asymptotics and approximate bias correction," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 18(2), pages 200-241, June.
    6. Yong Bao & Aman Ullah, 2021. "Analytical Finite Sample Econometrics: From A. L. Nagar to Now," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(1), pages 17-37, December.
    7. Jinyong Hahn & David W. Hughes & Guido Kuersteiner & Whitney K. Newey, 2024. "Efficient bias correction for cross‐section and panel data," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(3), pages 783-816, July.
    8. Michael Creel & Dennis Kristensen, "undated". "Indirect Likelihood Inference," Working Papers 558, Barcelona School of Economics.
    9. Fernández-Val, Iván & Vella, Francis, 2011. "Bias corrections for two-step fixed effects panel data estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 163(2), pages 144-162, August.
    10. Kyoo il Kim, 2006. "Higher Order Bias Correcting Moment Equation for M-Estimation and its Higher Order Efficiency," Labor Economics Working Papers 22453, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    11. Paul Rilstone, 2021. "Higher-Order Stochastic Expansions and Approximate Moments for Non-linear Models with Heterogeneous Observations," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(1), pages 99-120, December.
    12. Liu, Shew Fan & Yang, Zhenlin, 2015. "Improved inferences for spatial regression models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 55-67.
    13. Kundhi, Gubhinder & Rilstone, Paul, 2012. "Edgeworth expansions for GEL estimators," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 118-146.
    14. Christoph Strumann, 2019. "Hodges–Lehmann Estimation of Static Panel Models with Spatially Correlated Disturbances," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 141-168, January.
    15. Kristensen, Dennis & Salanié, Bernard, 2017. "Higher-order properties of approximate estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 189-208.
    16. Rossi, Francesca & Robinson, Peter M., 2023. "Higher-order least squares inference for spatial autoregressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 244-269.
    17. Grant Hillier & Federico Martellosio, 2013. "Properties of the maximum likelihood estimator in spatial autoregressive models," CeMMAP working papers CWP44/13, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    18. Dennis Kristensen & Bernard Salanié, 2010. "Higher Order Improvements for Approximate Estimators," CAM Working Papers 2010-04, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Applied Microeconometrics.
    19. Martellosio, Federico & Hillier, Grant, 2020. "Adjusted QMLE for the spatial autoregressive parameter," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 488-506.
    20. Gubhinder Kundhi & Paul Rilstone, 2015. "Saddlepoint expansions for GEL estimators," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 24(1), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:4:y:2016:i:4:p:48-:d:84668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.