IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecnmx/v4y2016i4p46-d82838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalized Information Matrix Tests for Detecting Model Misspecification

Author

Listed:
  • Richard M. Golden

    (School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, GR4.1, 800 W. Campbell Rd., University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

  • Steven S. Henley

    (Martingale Research Corporation, 101 E. Park Blvd., Suite 600, Plano, TX 75074, USA
    Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 92357, USA
    Center for Advanced Statistics in Education, VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA 92357, USA)

  • Halbert White

    (Department of Economics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
    Halbert White sadly passed away before this article was published.)

  • T. Michael Kashner

    (Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 92357, USA
    Office of Academic Affiliations (10A2D), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW (10A2D), Washington, DC 20420, USA
    Center for Advanced Statistics in Education, VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA 92357, USA
    Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390, USA)

Abstract

Generalized Information Matrix Tests (GIMTs) have recently been used for detecting the presence of misspecification in regression models in both randomized controlled trials and observational studies. In this paper, a unified GIMT framework is developed for the purpose of identifying, classifying, and deriving novel model misspecification tests for finite-dimensional smooth probability models. These GIMTs include previously published as well as newly developed information matrix tests. To illustrate the application of the GIMT framework, we derived and assessed the performance of new GIMTs for binary logistic regression. Although all GIMTs exhibited good level and power performance for the larger sample sizes, GIMT statistics with fewer degrees of freedom and derived using log-likelihood third derivatives exhibited improved level and power performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard M. Golden & Steven S. Henley & Halbert White & T. Michael Kashner, 2016. "Generalized Information Matrix Tests for Detecting Model Misspecification," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-24, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:4:y:2016:i:4:p:46-:d:82838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/4/4/46/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/4/4/46/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin Seo Cho & Halbert White, 2014. "Notations in "Testing the Equality of Two Positive-Definite Matrices with Application to Information Matrix Testing" by Cho and White (2014)," Working papers 2014rwp-67a, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    2. Dhaene, Geert & Hoorelbeke, Dirk, 2004. "The information matrix test with bootstrap-based covariance matrix estimation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 341-347, March.
    3. Bo-Cheng Wei & Jian-Qing Shi & Wing-Kam Fung & Yue-Qing Hu, 1998. "Testing for Varying Dispersion in Exponential Family Nonlinear Models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 50(2), pages 277-294, June.
    4. White,Halbert, 1996. "Estimation, Inference and Specification Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521574464, September.
    5. Wanling Huang & Artem Prokhorov, 2014. "A Goodness-of-fit Test for Copulas," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 751-771, October.
    6. Teresa Aparicio & Inmaculada Villanua, 2001. "The asymptotically efficient version of the information matrix test in binary choice models. A study of size and power," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 167-182.
    7. Hosmer, D.W. & Taber, S. & Lemeshow, S., 1991. "The importance of assessing the fit of logistic regression models: A case study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 81(12), pages 1630-1635.
    8. Chesher, Andrew, 1983. "The information matrix test : Simplified calculation via a score test interpretation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 45-48.
    9. Artem Prokhorov & Ulf Schepsmeier & Yajing Zhu, 2019. "Generalized information matrix tests for copulas," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 1024-1054, October.
    10. White, Halbert, 1980. "Using Least Squares to Approximate Unknown Regression Functions," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 21(1), pages 149-170, February.
    11. R. Golden, 2003. "Discrepancy Risk Model Selection Test theory for comparing possibly misspecified or nonnested models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 229-249, June.
    12. White, Halbert, 1982. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-25, January.
    13. Lancaster, Tony, 1984. "The Covariance Matrix of the Information Matrix Test," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(4), pages 1051-1053, July.
    14. Davidson, Russell & MacKinnon, James G, 1998. "Graphical Methods for Investigating the Size and Power of Hypothesis Tests," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 66(1), pages 1-26, January.
    15. Stomberg, Christopher & White, Halbert, 2000. "Bootstrapping the Information Matrix Test," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt158451cr, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    16. Presnell, Brett & Boos, Dennis D., 2004. "The IOS Test for Model Misspecification," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 216-227, January.
    17. Vuong, Quang H, 1989. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 307-333, March.
    18. Hamparsum Bozdogan, 1987. "Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 345-370, September.
    19. Davidson, Russell & MacKinnon, James G, 1992. "A New Form of the Information Matrix Test," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 145-157, January.
    20. Xiaohong Chen & Norman R. Swanson (ed.), 2013. "Recent Advances and Future Directions in Causality, Prediction, and Specification Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-1653-1, October.
    21. Qian M. Zhou & Peter X.-K. Song & Mary E. Thompson, 2012. "Information Ratio Test for Model Misspecification in Quasi-Likelihood Inference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(497), pages 205-213, March.
    22. Zhang, Shulin & Song, Peter X.-K. & Shi, Daimin & Zhou, Qian M., 2012. "Information ratio test for model misspecification on parametric structures in stochastic diffusion models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 3975-3987.
    23. Magnus, Jan R., 2010. "On the concept of matrix derivative," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(9), pages 2200-2206, October.
    24. Jin Seo Cho & Halbert White, 2014. "Testing the Equality of Two Positive-Definite Matrices with Application to Information Matrix Testing," Working papers 2014rwp-67, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao Sun & Yu Cheng & Ying Ding, 2023. "An information ratio‐based goodness‐of‐fit test for copula models on censored data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1713-1725, September.
    2. Verhagen, Mark D., 2021. "Identifying and Improving Functional Form Complexity: A Machine Learning Framework," SocArXiv bka76, Center for Open Science.
    3. Lijuan Huo & Jin Seo Cho, 2021. "Testing for the sandwich-form covariance matrix of the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(2), pages 293-317, June.
    4. Richard M. Golden & Steven S. Henley & Halbert White & T. Michael Kashner, 2019. "Consequences of Model Misspecification for Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Missing Data," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, September.
    5. Francesca Iorio & Riccardo Lucchetti & Rosaria Simone, 2024. "Testing distributional assumptions in CUB models for the analysis of rating data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 108(3), pages 669-701, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard M. Golden & Steven S. Henley & Halbert White & T. Michael Kashner, 2019. "Consequences of Model Misspecification for Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Missing Data," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Cho, Jin Seo & Phillips, Peter C.B., 2018. "Pythagorean generalization of testing the equality of two symmetric positive definite matrices," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 45-56.
    3. Dirk Hoorelbeke, 2004. "Bootstrap correcting the score test," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 228, Econometric Society.
    4. Wanling Huang & Artem Prokhorov, 2014. "A Goodness-of-fit Test for Copulas," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 751-771, October.
    5. Zhang, Shulin & Okhrin, Ostap & Zhou, Qian M. & Song, Peter X.-K., 2016. "Goodness-of-fit test for specification of semiparametric copula dependence models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 215-233.
    6. Riccardo Lucchetti & Claudia Pigini, 2013. "A test for bivariate normality with applications in microeconometric models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 22(4), pages 535-572, November.
    7. Li, Yong & Yu, Jun & Zeng, Tao, 2018. "Specification tests based on MCMC output," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 237-260.
    8. Jin Seo Cho & Peter C. B. Phillips & Juwon Seo, 2022. "Parametric Conditional Mean Inference With Functional Data Applied To Lifetime Income Curves," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(1), pages 391-456, February.
    9. Shulin Zhang & Qian M. Zhou & Huazhen Lin, 2021. "Goodness-of-fit test of copula functions for semi-parametric univariate time series models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1697-1721, August.
    10. King, Maxwell L. & Zhang, Xibin & Akram, Muhammad, 2020. "Hypothesis testing based on a vector of statistics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 425-455.
    11. Jin Seo Cho & Peter C.B. Phillips, "undated". "Testing Equality of Covariance Matrices via Pythagorean Means," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1970, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    12. Dhaene, Geert & Hoorelbeke, Dirk, 2004. "The information matrix test with bootstrap-based covariance matrix estimation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 341-347, March.
    13. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2008:i:5:p:1-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Davidson, Russell & MacKinnon, James G, 1998. "Graphical Methods for Investigating the Size and Power of Hypothesis Tests," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 66(1), pages 1-26, January.
    15. Daisuke Nagakura, 2008. "A note on the relationship between the information matrx test and a score test for parameter constancy," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(5), pages 1-7.
    16. Stomberg, Christopher & White, Halbert, 2000. "Bootstrapping the Information Matrix Test," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt158451cr, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    17. Zhang, Shulin & Song, Peter X.-K. & Shi, Daimin & Zhou, Qian M., 2012. "Information ratio test for model misspecification on parametric structures in stochastic diffusion models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 3975-3987.
    18. Choi, Hwan-sik, 2016. "Information theory for maximum likelihood estimation of diffusion models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 110-128.
    19. Lijuan Huo & Jin Seo Cho, 2021. "Testing for the sandwich-form covariance matrix of the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(2), pages 293-317, June.
    20. Kjersti Aas, 2016. "Pair-Copula Constructions for Financial Applications: A Review," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-15, October.
    21. Schepsmeier, Ulf, 2015. "Efficient information based goodness-of-fit tests for vine copula models with fixed margins: A comprehensive review," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 34-52.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:4:y:2016:i:4:p:46-:d:82838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.