IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i7p1138-d1434698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Participation and Farmers’ Adoption of Green Control Techniques: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Wulai Jijue

    (College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Junlan Xiang

    (College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Xin Yi

    (College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Xiaowen Dai

    (College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Chenming Tang

    (College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Yuying Liu

    (College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

As a standard clean production technology, the wide use of green control techniques (GCT) helps improve the quality of agricultural products and protect the environment. However, the level of application of GCT by Chinese farmers is not high. The market, as the ultimate place to realize the value of grain and the returns of grain farmers, plays an essential part in promoting GCT. Based on survey data from grain farmers in Sichuan Province, China, this study used a conditional mixed process (CMP) model to examine the effect of farmers’ market participation on their GCT adoption behavior and a mediated effects model to test the impact mechanism. The study further explored the effect of farmers’ market participation capability on their GCT adoption behavior. The results showed that (1) farmers’ market participation could significantly increase the likelihood of adopting GCT. (2) Market participation could influence farmers’ adoption behavior through agricultural income, market information, and green cognition. (3) Further research found that farmers were more likely to adopt GCT if their market participation capability was strong. These findings highlight the fact that developing countries have increased their efforts to encourage farmers to participate in markets and to enhance their market participation capability, thereby facilitating the adoption of GCT by farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wulai Jijue & Junlan Xiang & Xin Yi & Xiaowen Dai & Chenming Tang & Yuying Liu, 2024. "Market Participation and Farmers’ Adoption of Green Control Techniques: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1138-:d:1434698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/7/1138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/7/1138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adhvaryu, Achyuta & Nyshadham, Anant, 2017. "Health, Enterprise, and Labor Complementarity in the Household," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 91-111.
    2. Soul‐kifouly G. Midingoyi & Menale Kassie & Beatrice Muriithi & Gracious Diiro & Sunday Ekesi, 2019. "Do Farmers and the Environment Benefit from Adopting Integrated Pest Management Practices? Evidence from Kenya," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 452-470, June.
    3. Jiawen Ding & Javier Salinas-Jiménez & Maria del Mar Salinas-Jiménez, 2021. "The Impact of Income Inequality on Subjective Well-Being: The Case of China," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 845-866, February.
    4. Michael R. Carter & Yang Yao, 2002. "Local versus Global Separability in Agricultural Household Models: The Factor Price Equalization Effect of Land Transfer Rights," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(3), pages 702-715.
    5. Rivkin, Steven G., 2001. "Tiebout sorting, aggregation and the estimation of peer group effects," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 201-209, June.
    6. Justus Ochieng & Beatrice Knerr & George Owuor & Emily Ouma, 2020. "Food crops commercialization and household livelihoods: Evidence from rural regions in Central Africa," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 318-338, April.
    7. Wanglin Ma & Xiaobing Wang, 2020. "Internet Use, Sustainable Agricultural Practices and Rural Incomes: Evidence from China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1087-1112, October.
    8. Satyasai, K.J.S. & Pereira, Christine, 2019. "Can better market access lead to higher incomes for farmers?," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 32(Conferenc), December.
    9. Jikun Huang & Pengfei Shi, 2021. "Regional rural and structural transformations and farmer's income in the past four decades in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 278-301, January.
    10. Li, Junpeng & Ma, Wanglin & Gong, Binlei, 2023. "Market participation and subjective well-being of maize farmers," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 941-960.
    11. Lei Luo & Dakuan Qiao & Ruixin Zhang & Chenhao Luo & Xinhong Fu & Yuying Liu, 2022. "Research on the Influence of Education of Farmers’ Cooperatives on the Adoption of Green Prevention and Control Technologies by Members: Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Clara A. Brandi, 2017. "Sustainability Standards and Sustainable Development – Synergies and Trade‐Offs of Transnational Governance," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(1), pages 25-34, January.
    13. Jikun Huang & Pengfei Shi, 2021. "Regional rural and structural transformations and farmer's income in the past four decades in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 278-301, January.
    14. Asfaw, Solomon & Lipper, Leslie & Dalton, Timothy J. & Audi, Patrick, 2012. "Market participation, on-farm crop diversity and household welfare: micro-evidence from Kenya," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(5), pages 579-601, October.
    15. Raoul Herrmann & Ephraim Nkonya & Anja Faße, 2018. "Food value chain linkages and household food security in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(4), pages 827-839, August.
    16. Upama Adhikari, 2022. "Insect Pest Management: Mechanical And Physical Techniques," Reviews in Food and Agriculture (RFNA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 48-53, September.
    17. Nie, Wenjing & Li, Taiping & Zhu, Liqun, 2020. "Market demand and government regulation for quality grading system of agricultural products in China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan Hu & Ziyang Zhou & Li Zhou & Caiming Liu, 2024. "Self-Owned or Outsourced? The Impact of Farm Machinery Adoption Decisions on Chinese Farm Households’ Operating Income," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Junpeng & Ma, Wanglin & Gong, Binlei, 2023. "Market participation and subjective well-being of maize farmers," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 941-960.
    2. repec:ags:aaea22:335656 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Zheng, Hongyun & Ma, Wanglin, 2023. "Impact of agricultural commercialization on dietary diversity and vulnerability to poverty: Insights from Chinese rural households," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 558-569.
    4. Qiao Liang & Kangwei Ma & Wenhao Liu, 2023. "The role of farmer cooperatives in promoting environmentally sustainable agricultural development in China: A review," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 741-759, September.
    5. Adewale Isaac Olutumise & Taiwo Olarotimi Oladayo & Lawrence Olusola Oparinde & Igbekele Amos Ajibefun & Taye Timothy Amos & Yiseyon Sunday Hosu & Idowu Alimi, 2023. "Determinants of Health Management Practices’ Utilization and Its Effect on Poultry Farmers’ Income in Ondo State, Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Yang, Qi & Zhu, Yueji & Liu, Ling & Wang, Fang, 2021. "Land tenure stability and adoption intensity of sustainable agricultural practices: Evidence from banana farmers in China," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315254, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Adewale Isaac Olutumise, 2023. "Impact of credit on the climate adaptation utilization among food crop farmers in Southwest, Nigeria: application of endogenous treatment Poisson regression model," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Min Liu & Taiyang Zhong & Xiao Lyu, 2024. "Spatial Spillover Effects of “New Farmers” on Diffusion of Sustainable Agricultural Practices: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Hongyun Zheng & Wanglin Ma & Junpeng Li & Julio Botero, 2023. "Relationship between Internet Use and Negative Affect," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1693-1713, August.
    10. Ruining Li & Yanli Yu, 2022. "Impacts of Green Production Behaviors on the Income Effect of Rice Farmers from the Perspective of Outsourcing Services: Evidence from the Rice Region in Northwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-27, October.
    11. Babigumira, Ronnie & Angelsen, Arild & Buis, Maarten & Bauch, Simone & Sunderland, Terry & Wunder, Sven, 2014. "Forest Clearing in Rural Livelihoods: Household-Level Global-Comparative Evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(S1), pages 67-79.
    12. Wang, Xiaobing & Yu, Xiaohua, 2011. "Scale Effects, Technical Efficiency and Land Lease in China," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 115736, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Wang, Xiaobing & Herzfeld, Thomas & Glauben, Thomas, 2007. "Labor allocation in transition: Evidence from Chinese rural households," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 287-308.
    14. Gatti, Nicolas & Cecil, Michael & Baylis, Kathy & Estes, Lyndon & Blekking, Jordan & Heckelei, Thomas & Vergopolan, Noemi & Evans, Tom, 2023. "Is closing the agricultural yield gap a “risky” endeavor?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    15. Justin L. Tobias & Mingliang Li, 2003. "A finite-sample hierarchical analysis of wage variation across public high schools: evidence from the NLSY and high school and beyond," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(3), pages 315-336.
    16. Thanh‐Tung Nguyen & Trung Thanh Nguyen & Ulrike Grote, 2023. "Internet use and agricultural productivity in rural Vietnam," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1309-1326, August.
    17. Deng, Xin & Xu, Dingde & Zeng, Miao & Qi, Yanbin, 2019. "Does early-life famine experience impact rural land transfer? Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 58-67.
    18. Jia, Lili, 2012. "Land fragmentation and off-farm labor supply in China," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 66, number 66, September.
    19. repec:zbw:rwidps:0002 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Hannah Gichungi & Beatrice Muriithi & Patrick Irungu & Gracious Diiro & John Busienei, 2021. "Effect of Technological Innovation on Gender Roles: The Case of Fruit Fly IPM Adoption on Women’s Decision-Making in Mango Production and Marketing in Kenya," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 407-426, June.
    21. Gerson K. Kampungu & Emma Nekayi & Dortea N. Nakandjibi & Gilbert M. Mulonda, 2024. "Running Head: Factors Affecting Market Access for Horticultural Farmers," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(4), pages 1557-1569, April.
    22. Florence Goffette-Nagot & Claire Dujardin, 2005. "Neighborhood effects, public housing and unemployment in France," Working Papers 0505, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1138-:d:1434698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.