IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i8p1090-d870268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Data-Driven Models to Predict Biogas Production from Spent Mushroom Compost

Author

Listed:
  • Reza Salehi

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand)

  • Qiuyan Yuan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada)

  • Sumate Chaiprapat

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand
    PSU Energy Systems Research Institute, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand)

Abstract

In this study, two types of data-driven models were proposed to predict biogas production from anaerobic digestion of spent mushroom compost supplemented with wheat straw as a nutrient source. First, a k -nearest neighbours ( k -NN) model ( k = 1–10) was constructed. The optimal k value was determined using the cross-validation (CV) method. Second, a support vector machine (SVM) model was developed. The linear, quadratic, cubic, and Gaussian models were examined as kernel functions. The kernel scale was set to 6.93, while the box constraint ( C ) was optimized using the CV method. Results demonstrated that R 2 for the k -NN model ( k = 2) was 0.9830 at 35 °C and 0.9957 at 55 °C. The Gaussian-based SVM model ( C = 1200) provided an R 2 of 0.9973 at 35 °C and 0.9989 at 55 °C, which are slightly better than those achieved by k -NN. The Gaussian-based SVM model produced RMSE of 0.598 at 35 °C and 0.4183 at 55 °C, which are 58.4% and 49.5% smaller, respectively, than those produced by the k -NN. These findings imply that SVM modeling can be considered a robust technique in predicting biogas production from AD processes as they can be implemented without requiring prior knowledge of biogas production kinetics.

Suggested Citation

  • Reza Salehi & Qiuyan Yuan & Sumate Chaiprapat, 2022. "Development of Data-Driven Models to Predict Biogas Production from Spent Mushroom Compost," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1090-:d:870268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1090/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1090/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Pankaj & Kumar, Vinod & Singh, Jogendra & Kumar, Piyush, 2021. "Electrokinetic assisted anaerobic digestion of spent mushroom substrate supplemented with sugar mill wastewater for enhanced biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 418-426.
    2. Andrew Kusiak & Xiupeng Wei, 2014. "Prediction of methane production in wastewater treatment facility: a data-mining approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 216(1), pages 71-81, May.
    3. Xionghui Gao & Xiaoyu Tang & Kunyang Zhao & Venkatesh Balan & Qili Zhu, 2021. "Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Spent Mushroom Substrate with Different Livestock Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Seokho Kang, 2021. "k -Nearest Neighbor Learning with Graph Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Hakawati, Rawan & Smyth, Beatrice M. & McCullough, Geoffrey & De Rosa, Fabio & Rooney, David, 2017. "What is the most energy efficient route for biogas utilization: Heat, electricity or transport?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1076-1087.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siswo Sumardiono & Bakti Jos & Agata Advensia Eksa Dewanti & Isa Mahendra & Heri Cahyono, 2021. "Biogas Production from Coffee Pulp and Chicken Feathers Using Liquid- and Solid-State Anaerobic Digestions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Zhilong Wei & Lei Wang & Hu Liu & Zihao Liu & Haisheng Zhen, 2021. "Numerical Investigation on the Flame Structure and CO/NO Formations of the Laminar Premixed Biogas–Hydrogen Impinging Flame in the Wall Vicinity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Gao, Yuchen & Jiang, Jianguo & Meng, Yuan & Aihemaiti, Aikelaimu & Ju, Tongyao & Chen, Xuejing & Yan, Feng, 2020. "A novel nickel catalyst supported on activated coal fly ash for syngas production via biogas dry reforming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 786-793.
    4. Korberg, Andrei David & Skov, Iva Ridjan & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2020. "The role of biogas and biogas-derived fuels in a 100% renewable energy system in Denmark," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Błażej Gaze & Paulina Wojtko & Bernard Knutel & Przemysław Kobel & Kinga Bobrowicz & Przemysław Bukowski & Jerzy Chojnacki & Jan Kielar, 2023. "Influence of Catalytic Additive Application on the Wood-Based Waste Combustion Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Farzin, Farzad & Moghaddam, Shabnam Sadri & Ehteshami, Majid, 2024. "Auto-tuning data-driven model for biogas yield prediction from anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge at the south-tehran wastewater treatment plant: Feature selection and hyperparameter population-base," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    7. Baena-Moreno, Francisco M. & Pastor-Pérez, Laura & Zhang, Zhien & Reina, T.R., 2020. "Stepping towards a low-carbon economy. Formic acid from biogas as case of study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    8. Roozbeh Feiz & Jonas Ammenberg & Annika Björn & Yufang Guo & Magnus Karlsson & Yonghui Liu & Yuxian Liu & Laura Shizue Moriga Masuda & Alex Enrich-Prast & Harald Rohracher & Kristina Trygg & Sepehr Sh, 2019. "Biogas Potential for Improved Sustainability in Guangzhou, China—A Study Focusing on Food Waste on Xiaoguwei Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Alessandro Casasso & Marta Puleo & Deborah Panepinto & Mariachiara Zanetti, 2021. "Economic Viability and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Budget of the Biomethane Retrofit of Manure-Operated Biogas Plants: A Case Study from Piedmont, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Hamdy Ahmad Aly Alhendawy & Mohammed Galal Abdallah Mostafa & Mohamed Ibrahim Elgohari & Ibrahim Abdalla Abdelraouf Mohamed & Nabil Medhat Arafat Mahmoud & Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Mater, 2023. "Determinants of Renewable Energy Production in Egypt New Approach: Machine Learning Algorithms," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 679-689, November.
    11. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Rezazadeh, A. & Kabiri, S., 2020. "A feasibility study on the potential, economic, and environmental advantages of biogas production from poultry manure in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 87-106.
    12. Jakub Mazurkiewicz, 2023. "The Impact of Manure Use for Energy Purposes on the Economic Balance of a Dairy Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Park, Ho Young & Han, Karam & Yu, Geun Sil & Jang, Jihoon & Park, Sangbin & Kim, Hyun Hee & Min, Kyong-il & Kim, Jae-Kon, 2020. "Properties of bioliquids and their impacts on combustion and boiler operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Rawan Hakawati & Beatrice Smyth & Helen Daly & Geoffrey McCullough & David Rooney, 2019. "Is the Fischer-Tropsch Conversion of Biogas-Derived Syngas to Liquid Fuels Feasible at Atmospheric Pressure?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    15. Tong, Huanhuan & Shen, Ye & Zhang, Jingxin & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Ge, Tian Shu & Tong, Yen Wah, 2018. "A comparative life cycle assessment on four waste-to-energy scenarios for food waste generated in eateries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1143-1157.
    16. Meng, Xingyao & Wang, Qingping & Zhao, Xixi & Cai, Yafan & Ma, Xuguang & Fu, Jingyi & Wang, Pan & Wang, Yongjing & Liu, Wei & Ren, Lianhai, 2023. "A review of the technologies used for preserving anaerobic digestion inoculum," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    17. Yıldız Koç & Hüseyin Yağlı & Ali Koç, 2019. "Exergy Analysis and Performance Improvement of a Subcritical/Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Exhaust Gas Waste Heat Recovery in a Biogas Fuelled Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Engine Thro," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Jakub Mazurkiewicz, 2023. "Loss of Energy and Economic Potential of a Biogas Plant Fed with Cow Manure due to Storage Time," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Halil Akbaş & Gültekin Özdemir, 2020. "An Integrated Prediction and Optimization Model of a Thermal Energy Production System in a Factory Producing Furniture Components," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-29, November.
    20. Chong, Daniel Jia Sheng & Chan, Yi Jing & Arumugasamy, Senthil Kumar & Yazdi, Sara Kazemi & Lim, Jun Wei, 2023. "Optimisation and performance evaluation of response surface methodology (RSM), artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) in the prediction of biogas production ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1090-:d:870268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.