IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v9y2019i2p40-d234128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Conditional Value at Risk in the Tehran Stock Exchange Based on the Extreme Value Theory Using GARCH Models

Author

Listed:
  • Hamed Tabasi

    (Finance Department, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417614418, Iran)

  • Vahidreza Yousefi

    (Construction and Project Management, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417614418, Iran)

  • Jolanta Tamošaitienė

    (Institute of Sustainable Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio Ave. 11, Vilnius LT-10223, Lithuania)

  • Foroogh Ghasemi

    (Project and Construction Management, University of Art, Tehran 1136813518, Iran)

Abstract

This paper attempted to calculate the market risk in the Tehran Stock Exchange by estimating the Conditional Value at Risk. Since the Conditional Value at Risk is a tail-related measure, Extreme Value Theory has been utilized to estimate the risk more accurately. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models were used to model the volatility-clustering feature, and to estimate the parameters of the model, the Maximum Likelihood method was applied. The results of the study showed that in the estimation of model parameters, assuming T-student distribution function gave better results than the Normal distribution function. The Monte Carlo simulation method was used for backtesting the Conditional Value at Risk model, and in the end, the performance of different models, in the estimation of this measure, was compared.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamed Tabasi & Vahidreza Yousefi & Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Foroogh Ghasemi, 2019. "Estimating Conditional Value at Risk in the Tehran Stock Exchange Based on the Extreme Value Theory Using GARCH Models," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:40-:d:234128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/2/40/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/2/40/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gencay, Ramazan & Selcuk, Faruk, 2004. "Extreme value theory and Value-at-Risk: Relative performance in emerging markets," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 287-303.
    2. Philippe Jorion, 2009. "Risk Management Lessons from the Credit Crisis," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 15(5), pages 923-933, November.
    3. Yu, Wenhua & Yang, Kun & Wei, Yu & Lei, Likun, 2018. "Measuring Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall of crude oil portfolio using extreme value theory and vine copula," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 1423-1433.
    4. Juan Carlos Escanciano & Zaichao Du, 2015. "Backtesting Expected Shortfall: Accounting for Tail Risk," CAEPR Working Papers 2015-001, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    5. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K. Hassani, 2018. "More accurate measurement for enhanced controls: VaR vs ES?," Post-Print halshs-01917569, HAL.
    6. Jon Danielsson & Casper G. De Vries, 2000. "Value-at-Risk and Extreme Returns," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 60, pages 239-270.
    7. François M. Longin, 1999. "Optimal margin level in futures markets: Extreme price movements," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 127-152, April.
    8. Hussain, Saiful Izzuan & Li, Steven, 2018. "The dependence structure between Chinese and other major stock markets using extreme values and copulas," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 421-437.
    9. Stoyan Stoyanov & Lixia Loh & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2017. "How fat are the tails of equity market indices?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 181-200, July.
    10. Brooks, C. & Clare, A.D. & Dalle Molle, J.W. & Persand, G., 2005. "A comparison of extreme value theory approaches for determining value at risk," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 339-352, March.
    11. Bhattacharyya, Malay & Ritolia, Gopal, 2008. "Conditional VaR using EVT - Towards a planned margin scheme," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 382-395.
    12. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K. Hassani, 2018. "More accurate measurement for enhanced controls: VaR vs ES?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01917569, HAL.
    13. McNeil, Alexander J. & Frey, Rudiger, 2000. "Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: an extreme value approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(3-4), pages 271-300, November.
    14. Chen-Yu Chen & Jian-Hsin Chou & Hung-Gay Fung & Yiuman Tse, 2017. "Setting the futures margin with price limits: the case for single-stock futures," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 219-237, January.
    15. repec:adr:anecst:y:2000:i:60:p:10 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Samit Paul & Prateek Sharma, 2017. "Improved VaR forecasts using extreme value theory with the Realized GARCH model," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(2), pages 238-259, June.
    17. Cotter, John, 2001. "Margin exceedences for European stock index futures using extreme value theory," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 1475-1502, August.
    18. James Ming Chen, 2018. "On Exactitude in Financial Regulation: Value-at-Risk, Expected Shortfall, and Expectiles," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-28, June.
    19. Jacopo Corbetta & Ilaria Peri, 2018. "Backtesting lambda value at risk," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(13), pages 1075-1087, September.
    20. Rüdiger Kiesel & Robin Rühlicke & Gerhard Stahl & Jinsong Zheng, 2016. "The Wasserstein Metric and Robustness in Risk Management," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-14, August.
    21. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    22. Marco Bee & Luca Trapin, 2018. "Estimating and Forecasting Conditional Risk Measures with Extreme Value Theory: A Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-16, April.
    23. Ahmed Ghorbel & Abdelwahed Trabelsi, 2008. "Predictive performance of conditional Extreme Value Theory in Value-at-Risk estimation," International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2), pages 121-148.
    24. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    25. Guegan, Dominique & Hassani, Bertrand K., 2018. "More accurate measurement for enhanced controls: VaR vs ES?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 152-165.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed, Dilan & Soleymani, Fazlollah & Ullah, Malik Zaka & Hasan, Hataw, 2021. "Managing the risk based on entropic value-at-risk under a normal-Rayleigh distribution," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 402(C).
    2. Cristi Spulbar & Ramona Birau & Iqbal Thonse Hawaldar & Jatin Trivedi & Anca Ioana Iacob (Troto), 2023. "Measuring Asymmetric Volatility Of Uk, France, And German Stock Markets," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 134-146, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santiago Carrillo Menéndez & Bertrand Kian Hassani, 2021. "Expected Shortfall Reliability—Added Value of Traditional Statistics and Advanced Artificial Intelligence for Market Risk Measurement Purposes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Marco Rocco, 2011. "Extreme value theory for finance: a survey," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 99, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    3. Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Vahidreza Yousefi & Hamed Tabasi, 2021. "Project Portfolio Construction Using Extreme Value Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Yun Feng & Weijie Hou & Yuping Song, 2024. "Tail risk forecasting and its application to margin requirements in the commodity futures market," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1513-1529, August.
    5. Cotter, John, 2007. "Varying the VaR for unconditional and conditional environments," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(8), pages 1338-1354, December.
    6. Krzysztof Echaust & Małgorzata Just, 2020. "Value at Risk Estimation Using the GARCH-EVT Approach with Optimal Tail Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Benjamin Mögel & Benjamin R. Auer, 2018. "How accurate are modern Value-at-Risk estimators derived from extreme value theory?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 979-1030, May.
    8. Ra l de Jes s-Guti rrez & Roberto J. Santill n-Salgado, 2019. "Conditional Extreme Values Theory and Tail-related Risk Measures: Evidence from Latin American Stock Markets," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 127-141.
    9. Halkos, George & Tsirivis, Apostolos, 2019. "Using Value-at-Risk for effective energy portfolio risk management," MPRA Paper 91674, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. James Ming Chen, 2018. "On Exactitude in Financial Regulation: Value-at-Risk, Expected Shortfall, and Expectiles," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-28, June.
    11. George Kouretas & Leonidas Zarangas, 2005. "Conditional autoregressive valu at risk by regression quantile: Estimatingmarket risk for major stock markets," Working Papers 0521, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    12. Chen, Yan & Yu, Wenqiang, 2020. "Setting the margins of Hang Seng Index Futures on different positions using an APARCH-GPD Model based on extreme value theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 544(C).
    13. George Tzagkarakis & Frantz Maurer, 2020. "An energy-based measure for long-run horizon risk quantification," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 363-390, June.
    14. Xiao, Yang, 2020. "The risk spillovers from the Chinese stock market to major East Asian stock markets: A MSGARCH-EVT-copula approach," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 173-186.
    15. Alexander, Carol & Sheedy, Elizabeth, 2008. "Developing a stress testing framework based on market risk models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 2220-2236, October.
    16. Maziar Sahamkhadam, 2021. "Dynamic copula-based expectile portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 209-223, May.
    17. Wagner Piazza Gaglianone & Luiz Renato Lima & Oliver Linton & Daniel R. Smith, 2011. "Evaluating Value-at-Risk Models via Quantile Regression," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 150-160, January.
    18. Bakshi, Gurdip & Panayotov, George, 2010. "First-passage probability, jump models, and intra-horizon risk," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 20-40, January.
    19. Kittiya Chaithep & Songsak Sriboonchitta & Chukiat Chaiboonsri & Pathairat Pastpipatkul, 2012. "Value at Risk Analysis of Gold Price Returns Using Extreme Value Theory," The Empirical Econometrics and Quantitative Economics Letters, Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, vol. 1(4), pages 151-168, December.
    20. Karmakar, Madhusudan & Paul, Samit, 2016. "Intraday risk management in International stock markets: A conditional EVT approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 34-55.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:40-:d:234128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.