IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v8y2018i4p68-d180429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of Gender-Responsive Budgeting (GRB) by an Italian Municipality

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanna Galizzi

    (Department of Management, Economics and Quantitative Method, University of Bergamo, Bergamo 24127, Italy)

  • Gaia Viviana Bassani

    (Department of Management, Economics and Quantitative Method, University of Bergamo, Bergamo 24127, Italy)

  • Cristiana Cattaneo

    (Department of Management, Economics and Quantitative Method, University of Bergamo, Bergamo 24127, Italy)

Abstract

Over the past few decades, many governments throughout the world have promoted gender-responsive budgeting (GRB). With its focus on equality, accountability, transparency and participation in the policy-making process, GRB shares some relevant principles with public governance that call governments at national and subnational levels to rethink their roles in the whole economic system. This worldwide political and managerial interest does not find sufficient space in academic discussion, mainly in terms of public administration and management studies. Adopting an interpretative approach, the present study aims to investigate how an Italian municipality has involved stakeholders in the GRB process. The case study shows that, when GRB is fully developed, the stakeholders involved are both internal and external, and these multiple actors, in pursuing gender equality, cooperate to achieve a common, public aim. In this way, GRB gives effectiveness to the public decision-making process, contributing to greater incisiveness in the local government’s management and creation of a gender-sensitive governance process.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanna Galizzi & Gaia Viviana Bassani & Cristiana Cattaneo, 2018. "Adoption of Gender-Responsive Budgeting (GRB) by an Italian Municipality," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:68-:d:180429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/8/4/68/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/8/4/68/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avner BEN-NER & Theresa VAN HOOMISSEN, 1991. "Nonprofit Organizations In The Mixed Economy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 519-550, October.
    2. Diane Elson, 1998. "Integrating gender issues into national budgetary policies and procedures: some policy options," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(7), pages 929-941.
    3. Rhonda Sharp & Ray Broomhill, 2002. "Budgeting for Equality: The Australian Experience," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 25-47.
    4. Susan Himmelweit, 2002. "Making Visible the Hidden Economy: The Case for Gender-Impact Analysis of Economic Policy," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 49-70.
    5. Loke-Min Foo & Darinka Asenova & Stephen Bailey & John Hood, 2011. "Stakeholder Engagement and Compliance Culture," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 707-729, June.
    6. John M Bryson, 2004. "What to do when Stakeholders matter," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 21-53, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brunilda Llaftiu & Ingrid Shuli, 2024. "Gender Budgeting: A Contextual Analysis of the Higher-Education Sector in Albania," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Manuela Lucchese & Ferdinando Di Carlo & Natalia Aversano & Giuseppe Sannino & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini, 2022. "Gender Reporting Guidelines in Italian Public Universities for Assessing SDG 5 in the International Context," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Carla Del Gesso, 2019. "Gender Budgeting Implementation in Italian Regional Governments: Institutional Behavior for Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 110-110, November.
    4. Chiara Oppi & Caterina Cavicchi & Emidia Vagnoni, 2021. "The Journey to Gender-Responsive Budgeting: Lessons Learned from Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rhonda Sharp & Ray Broomhill, 2002. "Budgeting for Equality: The Australian Experience," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 25-47.
    2. O’Hagan Angela, 2017. "Gender budgeting in Scotland: A work in progress," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 65(3), pages 17-39, August.
    3. Cevat Tosun & Necmiddin Bağdadioğlu, 2016. "Evaluating gender responsive budgeting in Turkey," International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 187-197.
    4. Suzy Morrissey, 2018. "Gender Budgeting: A Useful Approach for Aotearoa New Zealand," Treasury Working Paper Series 18/02, New Zealand Treasury.
    5. Khalifa, Rihab & Scarparo, Simona, 2021. "Gender Responsive Budgeting: A tool for gender equality," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Chakraborty, Lekha, 2023. "Beyond GDP and Public Policies for Gender Equality: Gender Budgeting in Asia Pacific," Working Papers 23/404, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    7. Carmen Echebarría Miguel & Mercedes Larrañaga Sarriegui, 2004. "La igualdad entre mujeres y hombres: una asignatura pendiente," CIRIEC-España, revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa, CIRIEC-España, issue 50, pages 11-35, November.
    8. Bert George, 2017. "Does strategic planning ‘work’ in public organizations? Insights from Flemish municipalities," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(7), pages 527-530, November.
    9. Marina Sánchez, 2015. "De la reproducción económica a la sostenibilidad de la vida," Revista de Economía Crítica, Asociación de Economía Crítica, vol. 19, pages 58-76.
    10. Erwan Quéinnec, 2012. "Les organisations sans but lucratif repondent- elles à une demande de biens de confiance ? Le cas des services de prise en charge," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 122(1), pages 67-87.
    11. Martin Luštický & Martin Musil, 2016. "Stakeholder-Based Evaluation of Tourism Policy Priorities: The Case of the South Bohemian Region," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(3), pages 3-23.
    12. Jolanta MAJ, 2015. "Diversity Management’S Stakeholders And Stakeholders Management," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 780-793, November.
    13. Franco-Trigo, L. & Fernandez-Llimos, F. & Martínez-Martínez, F. & Benrimoj, S.I. & Sabater-Hernández, D., 2020. "Stakeholder analysis in health innovation planning processes: A systematic scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(10), pages 1083-1099.
    14. Hozer-Koćmiel Marta & Kuźmiński Wojciech, 2020. "Modelling Unpaid Housework Time in Poland on the Basis of a Time Use Survey," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 177-189, June.
    15. Carlo Borzaga & Silvia Sacchetti, 2015. "Why Social Enterprises Are Asking to Be Multi-stakeholder and Deliberative: An Explanation around the Costs of Exclusion," Euricse Working Papers 1575, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    16. Kik, M.C. & Claassen, G.D.H. & Meuwissen, M.P.M. & Smit, A.B. & Saatkamp, H.W., 2021. "Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    17. Junyi Shen & Nobuko Kanaya & Hiromasa Takahashi, 2014. "The Share of Nonprofit and For-profit Organizations in the Quasi-market: An Analysis of the Long-term Care Services Market in Japan," Discussion Paper Series DP2014-08, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    18. Mark K. McBeth & Donna L. Lybecker & James W. Stoutenborough, 2016. "Do stakeholders analyze their audience? The communication switch and stakeholder personal versus public communication choices," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(4), pages 421-444, December.
    19. Sacchetti, Silvia & Tortia, Ermanno, 2012. "The internal and external governance of cooperatives: the effective membership and consistency of value," AICCON Working Papers 111-2012, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    20. Enrico Bracci & Mouhcine Tallaki, 2013. "Socio-environmental reporting trends in the Italian local government: Thrive or wither?," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 27-46.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:68-:d:180429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.