IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ret/ecocri/rec19_04.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

De la reproducción económica a la sostenibilidad de la vida

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Sánchez

Abstract

El análisis sobre los procesos de mantenimiento de la vida ha marcado importantes rupturas dentro de la teoría económica. Empezando por el análisis de la subsistencia de la economía política, siguiendo con las aportaciones del "Debate sobre el trabajo doméstico", el surgimiento del enfoque producción-reproducción y, finalmente, el enfoque de la sostenibilidad de la vida, cada perspectiva ha entendido dichos procesos y los trabajos no remunerados de manera diferente. Este hecho tiene importantes consecuencias a la hora de excluir o incluir las experiencias económicas de las mujeres, entre otros muchos sujetos. Dar centralidad analítica a los procesos de mantenimiento de la vida es importante para entender el funcionamiento de la economía en su conjunto, así como crear una mirada económica que ponga la vida en el centro, como dice el enfoque de la sostenibilidad de la vida.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Sánchez, 2015. "De la reproducción económica a la sostenibilidad de la vida," Revista de Economía Crítica, Asociación de Economía Crítica, vol. 19, pages 58-76.
    • Handle: RePEc:ret:ecocri:rec19_04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistaeconomiacritica.org/index.php/rec/article/view/25/13
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Himmelweit, Susan & Mohun, Simon, 1977. "Domestic Labour and Capital," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(1), pages 15-31, March.
    2. Nancy Folbre, 1995. ""Holding hands at midnight": The paradox of caring labor," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 73-92.
    3. Susan Himmelweit, 2002. "Making Visible the Hidden Economy: The Case for Gender-Impact Analysis of Economic Policy," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 49-70.
    4. Amaia Pérez Orozco, 2006. "Amenaza tormenta: la crisis de los cuidados y la reorganización del sistema económico," Revista de Economía Crítica, Asociación de Economía Crítica, vol. 5, pages 7-37.
    5. Cristina Carrasco Bengoa, 2011. "La economía del cuidado: planteamiento actual y desafíos pendientes," Revista de Economía Crítica, Asociación de Economía Crítica, vol. 11, pages 205-225.
    6. Antonella Picchio, 2009. "Condiciones de vida: perspectivas, análisis económico y políticas públicas," Revista de Economía Crítica, Asociación de Economía Crítica, vol. 7, pages 27-54.
    7. Cristina Carrasco, 2006. "La paradoja del cuidado: necesario pero invisible," Revista de Economía Crítica, Asociación de Economía Crítica, vol. 5, pages 39-64.
    8. Susan Himmelweit, 1995. "The Discovery of 'Unpaid Work': the social consequences of the expansion of 'work'," Open Discussion Papers in Economics 6, The Open University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gillian Hewitson, 2001. "A Survey of Feminist Economics," Working Papers 2001.01, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    2. Ellen Mutari, 2001. ""...As broad as our life experience": visions of feminist political economy, 1972-1991," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 379-399, December.
    3. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2024. "Two neglected origins of inequality: hierarchical power and care work," LEM Papers Series 2024/04, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    4. Sarah-Louise Ruder & Sophia Rose Sanniti, 2019. "Transcending the Learned Ignorance of Predatory Ontologies: A Research Agenda for an Ecofeminist-Informed Ecological Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Susan Donath, 2000. "The Other Economy: A Suggestion for a Distinctively Feminist Economics," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 115-123.
    6. Zdravka, Todorova, 2009. "Employer of Last Resort Policy and Feminist Economics: Social Provisioning and Socialization of Investment," MPRA Paper 16240, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. M. V. Lee BADGETT & Nancy FOLBRE, 1999. "Assigning care: Gender norms and economic outcomes," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 138(3), pages 311-326, September.
    8. David H. Ciscel & Julia A. Heath, 2001. "To market, to market: Imperial capitalism's destruction of social capital and the family," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 401-414, December.
    9. Margaret Lewis & Kimmarie McGoldrick, 2001. "Moving Beyond the Masculine Neoclassical Classroom," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 91-103.
    10. Carmichael, Fiona & Ercolani, Marco G., 2016. "Unpaid caregiving and paid work over life-courses: Different pathways, diverging outcomes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-11.
    11. Jane Humphries, 1977. "The Working Class Family, Women's Liberation, and Class Struggle: The Case of Nineteenth Century British History," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 9(3), pages 25-41, October.
    12. Olena Hankivsk & Jane Friesen & Colleen Varcoe & Fiona MacPhail & Lorraine Greaves & Charmaine Spencer, 2004. "Expanding Economic Costing in Health Care: Values, Gender and Diversity," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 30(3), pages 257-282, September.
    13. Nitya Rao, 2018. "Global Agendas, Local Norms: Mobilizing around Unpaid Care and Domestic Work in Asia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(3), pages 735-758, May.
    14. M. Ruth Dike, 2021. "“The machine does it!”: Using convenience technologies to analyze care, reproductive labor, gender, and class in urban Morocco," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 311-325, June.
    15. Herbert Gintis & Samuel Bowles, 1981. "Structure and Practice in the Labor Theory of Value," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, January.
    16. Rhonda Sharp & Ray Broomhill, 2002. "Budgeting for Equality: The Australian Experience," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 25-47.
    17. Burton, Peter & Lethbridge, Lynn & Phipps, Shelley, 2008. "Children with disabilities and chronic conditions and longer-term parental health," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1168-1186, June.
    18. Mary McThomas & Roberto Gallardo, 2012. "The Impact of “Caring” Policies on Societal Issues," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 10(04), pages 32-38, December.
    19. Singh, Neera M., 2015. "Payments for ecosystem services and the gift paradigm: Sharing the burden and joy of environmental care," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 53-61.
    20. Paula Rodríguez-Modroño & Lina Gálvez-Muñoz & Astrid Agenjo-Calderón, 2015. "The hidden role of women in family firms," Working Papers 15.01, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics, Quantitative Methods and Economic History, revised Dec 2015.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ret:ecocri:rec19_04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Biblioteca-CRAI, Servicio de Publicación Digital (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aecrcea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.