IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cic/revcir/y2004i50p11-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La igualdad entre mujeres y hombres: una asignatura pendiente

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Echebarría Miguel

    (Universidad del País Vasco)

  • Mercedes Larrañaga Sarriegui

    (Universidad del País Vasco)

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to analyse women’s and men’s relationships with work, especially with the labour market. It covers matters such as training, labour activity, unemployment, job segregation, remuneration and job insecurity. Although the analysis focuses on the labour environment, references to inequality in the distribution of unpaid work are inevitable because this lies behind much of the inequality in the labour market. The second part of the text first discusses the continuing inequality between women and men and the slow progress being made in achieving real equality. It then considers measures taken in recent years to eliminate gender inequality and pays special attention to a new, innovative proposal we consider of interest, the drafting of budgets from a gender point of view.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Echebarría Miguel & Mercedes Larrañaga Sarriegui, 2004. "La igualdad entre mujeres y hombres: una asignatura pendiente," CIRIEC-España, revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa, CIRIEC-España, issue 50, pages 11-35, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cic:revcir:y:2004:i:50:p:11-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ciriec-revistaeconomia.es/banco/01_Echebarria_50.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rhonda Sharp & Ray Broomhill, 2002. "Budgeting for Equality: The Australian Experience," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 25-47.
    2. Susan Himmelweit, 2002. "Making Visible the Hidden Economy: The Case for Gender-Impact Analysis of Economic Policy," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 49-70.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. O’Hagan Angela, 2017. "Gender budgeting in Scotland: A work in progress," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 65(3), pages 17-39, August.
    2. Giovanna Galizzi & Gaia Viviana Bassani & Cristiana Cattaneo, 2018. "Adoption of Gender-Responsive Budgeting (GRB) by an Italian Municipality," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Suzy Morrissey, 2018. "Gender Budgeting: A Useful Approach for Aotearoa New Zealand," Treasury Working Paper Series 18/02, New Zealand Treasury.
    4. Khalifa, Rihab & Scarparo, Simona, 2021. "Gender Responsive Budgeting: A tool for gender equality," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Chakraborty, Lekha, 2023. "Beyond GDP and Public Policies for Gender Equality: Gender Budgeting in Asia Pacific," Working Papers 23/404, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    6. Marina Sánchez, 2015. "De la reproducción económica a la sostenibilidad de la vida," Revista de Economía Crítica, Asociación de Economía Crítica, vol. 19, pages 58-76.
    7. Hozer-Koćmiel Marta & Kuźmiński Wojciech, 2020. "Modelling Unpaid Housework Time in Poland on the Basis of a Time Use Survey," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 177-189, June.
    8. Enrico Bracci & Mouhcine Tallaki, 2013. "Socio-environmental reporting trends in the Italian local government: Thrive or wither?," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 27-46.
    9. Chiara Oppi & Caterina Cavicchi & Emidia Vagnoni, 2021. "The Journey to Gender-Responsive Budgeting: Lessons Learned from Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Katherine Lim & Mike Zabek, 2024. "Women’s Labor Force Exits During COVID-19: Differences by Motherhood, Race, and Ethnicity," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 504-527, September.
    11. Silvia Fissi & Alberto Romolini & Elena Gori & Marco Contri, 2022. "Women participation in academic management positions. Evidence from Italian universities," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(3), pages 163-176.
    12. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2008. "Gender Budgeting in Austria," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 6(2), pages 44-51, 07.
    13. Andrea Spehar, 2017. "The Politics of Pseudoactions Local Governance and Gender Policy Implementation in the Western Balkans," Working Papers id:12013, eSocialSciences.
    14. Rhonda Sharp & Ray Broomhill, 2002. "Budgeting for Equality: The Australian Experience," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 25-47.
    15. Asha Hans & Amrita M. Patel & S.B. Agnihotri, 2008. "The Need for a Framework for Combined Disability and Gender Budgeting," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 15(2), pages 233-260, May.
    16. Johnna Montgomerie, 2023. "COVID Keynesianism: locating inequality in the Anglo-American crisis response," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 211-223.
    17. Maria Coelho & Aieshwarya Davis & Alexander Klemm & Carolina Osorio-Buitron, 2024. "Gendered taxes: the interaction of tax policy with gender equality," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 31(5), pages 1413-1460, October.
    18. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2008. "Gender Budgeting in Austria," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 6(02), pages 44-51, July.
    19. Sue Durbin & Margaret Page & Sylvia Walby & Emma Craddock, 2017. "Caring About and For the Cuts: a Case Study of the Gendered Dimension of Austerity and Anti-austerity Activism," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 69-82, January.
    20. Julia Bachtrögler-Unger & Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Paul Eckerstorfer & Peter Huber & Christine Mayrhuber & Mark Sommer & Gerhard Streicher, 2019. "Wachstumsfaktor Gleichstellung. Der ökonomische Nutzen von Gender Budgeting in Wien," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 65741, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Women; work; labour market; discrimination; equality; mainstreaming; gender budgets.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J58 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Public Policy
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • J70 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cic:revcir:y:2004:i:50:p:11-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rafael Chaves (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciriees.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.