IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i5p97-d1390370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mediating Effect of Affective Commitment on the Relationship between Competence Development and Turnover Intentions: Does This Relationship Depend on the Employee’s Generation?

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Moreira

    (APPsyCI—Applied Psychology Research Center Capabilities & Inclusion, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal
    School of Psychology, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, Rua do Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal
    Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Europeia, Quinta do Bom Nome, Estr. da Correia 53, 1500-210 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Carla Tomás

    (Department of Psychology and Sports, Instituto Superior Manuel Teixeira Gomes, 8500-590 Portimão, Portugal)

  • Armanda Antunes

    (Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Europeia, Quinta do Bom Nome, Estr. da Correia 53, 1500-210 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

The main objective of this investigation was to study the effect of organizational competency development practices on turnover intentions and whether affective commitment explains this relationship. Another of the study’s objectives was to test whether these relationships vary according to the generation to which the participant belongs. The study sample consisted of 2123 participants working in Portuguese organizations. The results indicate that organizational competency development practices (training, individualized support, and functional rotation) negatively and significantly affect turnover intentions and that affective commitment mediates this relationship. However, these relationships vary according to the participant’s generation. For Generation Y and Generation X, this mediating effect is found in all dimensions of organizational competency development practices. For the baby boomer generation, there is only a mediating effect of affective commitment in the relationship between individualized support and turnover intentions. These results indicate that human resources should consider the generation to which the participant belongs when implementing competency development practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Moreira & Carla Tomás & Armanda Antunes, 2024. "The Mediating Effect of Affective Commitment on the Relationship between Competence Development and Turnover Intentions: Does This Relationship Depend on the Employee’s Generation?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:97-:d:1390370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/5/97/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/5/97/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Campbell, W. Keith & Campbell, Stacy M. & Siedor, Lane E. & Twenge, Jean M., 2015. "Generational Differences Are Real and Useful," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 324-331, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melissa Bohnert & Pablo Gracia, 2021. "Emerging Digital Generations? Impacts of Child Digital Use on Mental and Socioemotional Well-Being across Two Cohorts in Ireland, 2007–2018," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(2), pages 629-659, April.
    2. Mihaela Simona Moise & Irene Gil-Saura & María-Eugenia Ruiz-Molina, 2020. "Implications of Value Co-Creation in Green Hotels: The Moderating Effect of Trip Purpose and Generational Cohort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Nathalie Peña-García & David van der Woude & Augusto Rodríguez-Orejuela, 2022. "Recommend or Not: Is Generation the Key? A Perspective from the SOR Paradigm for Online Stores in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Maximiano Ortiz-Pimentel & Carlos Molina & Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo, 2020. "Bibliometric assessment of papers on generations in management and business journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 445-469, October.
    5. Maria Clara Kreis & Debra W. Moore, 2022. "The Phenomenon of Generational Cohort Differences in Life Satisfaction Reports," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(2), pages 1-1, June.
    6. Kelly Pledger Weeks & Caitlin Schaffert, 2019. "Generational Differences in Definitions of Meaningful Work: A Mixed Methods Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 1045-1061, June.
    7. Dunaetz, David Robert & Yun, Jaimie C. & Lord, Jasmine & Howard, Jaye & Gobrail, Mark, 2023. "Self-Leadership, Seeking God’s Will, and Thriving," OSF Preprints q2m5t, Center for Open Science.
    8. Dunaetz, David Robert & Gobrail, Mark & Howard, Jaye & Lord, Jasmine & Yun, Jaimie C., 2024. "Self-Leadership Practices and Beliefs in Nonprofit Organizations: Differences Between Leaders and Non-Leaders," OSF Preprints 6wrft, Center for Open Science.
    9. Alkire (née Nasr), Linda & O'Connor, Genevieve E. & Myrden, Susan & Köcher, Sören, 2020. "Patient experience in the digital age: An investigation into the effect of generational cohorts," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    10. Twenge, Jean M. & Campbell, W. Keith & Sherman, Ryne A., 2019. "Declines in vocabulary among American adults within levels of educational attainment, 1974–2016," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Alan C. Logan & Susan L. Prescott, 2022. "Planetary Health: We Need to Talk about Narcissism," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:97-:d:1390370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.