IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16104-d991212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recommend or Not: Is Generation the Key? A Perspective from the SOR Paradigm for Online Stores in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Peña-García

    (Research Department, CESA Business School, Bogota 110311, Colombia)

  • David van der Woude

    (Research Department, CESA Business School, Bogota 110311, Colombia)

  • Augusto Rodríguez-Orejuela

    (Departamento de Gestión y Organizaciones, Facultad Ciencias de la Administración, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760042, Colombia)

Abstract

Word-of-mouth behavior is one of the most effective marketing communications. Despite not being able to be controlled by the company, it can be influenced. Its importance lies in its effectiveness in repeat sales and attracting new customers. However, in the study of consumer behavior, it has been shown that the differences between subgroups can be relevant for the business sector, allowing it to generate specific strategies for each segment. In that respect, this research aims to find the determinants of WOM in generations X and Y to know the meanings these consumers give to the elements proposed within the SOR paradigm. A quantitative study was conducted using a sample of 537 e-commerce customers surveyed with a structured questionnaire to test the proposed relationships. Results are analyzed with structural equations, and a multigroup analysis is presented to find the differences between generation X and generation Y. The results indicate that, for millennials, the ease of use of electronic stores is essential to enjoying the shopping experience. Implications are discussed in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Peña-García & David van der Woude & Augusto Rodríguez-Orejuela, 2022. "Recommend or Not: Is Generation the Key? A Perspective from the SOR Paradigm for Online Stores in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16104-:d:991212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruiz-Mafé, Carla & Sanz-Blas, Silvia & Aldás-Manzano, Joaquín, 2009. "Drivers and barriers to online airline ticket purchasing," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 294-298.
    2. Sabina Lissitsa & Ofrit Kol, 2021. "Four generational cohorts and hedonic m-shopping: association between personality traits and purchase intention," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 545-570, June.
    3. Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed & Al-Debei, Mutaz M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: The driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Smith, Rachel & Deitz, George & Royne, Marla B. & Hansen, John D. & Grünhagen, Marko & Witte, Carl, 2013. "Cross-cultural examination of online shopping behavior: A comparison of Norway, Germany, and the United States," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 328-335.
    5. Wahyuningsih & Hanny Nasution & Yulia Hendri Yeni & Ratna Roostika, 2022. "A comparative study of generations X, Y, Z in food purchasing behavior: the relationships among customer value, satisfaction, and Ewom," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2105585-210, December.
    6. Yinglu Sun & Wei Xue & Subir Bandyopadhyay & Dong Cheng, 2022. "WeChat mobile-payment-based smart retail customer experience: an integrated framework," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 77-94, June.
    7. Campbell, W. Keith & Campbell, Stacy M. & Siedor, Lane E. & Twenge, Jean M., 2015. "Generational Differences Are Real and Useful," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 324-331, September.
    8. Dellarocas, Chrysanthos, 2003. "The Digitization of Word-of-mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms," Working papers 4296-03, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    9. Tazizur Rahman & Yang Sok Kim & Mijin Noh & Choong Kwon Lee, 2020. "Determinants of social commerce adoption in an emerging economy," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(4), pages 479-502, December.
    10. Iyer, Rajesh & Griffin, Mitch, 2021. "Modeling word-of-mouth usage: A replication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 512-523.
    11. Calder, Bobby J. & Malthouse, Edward C. & Schaedel, Ute, 2009. "An Experimental Study of the Relationship between Online Engagement and Advertising Effectiveness," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 321-331.
    12. Ambalov, Igor Alexander, 2021. "Decomposition of perceived usefulness: A theoretical perspective and empirical test," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Bastos, Wilson & Moore, Sarah G., 2021. "Making word-of-mouth impactful: Why consumers react more to WOM about experiential than material purchases," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 110-123.
    14. Lova Rajaobelina & Isabelle Brun & Nour Kilani & Line Ricard, 2022. "Examining emotions linked to live chat services: The role of e-service quality and impact on word of mouth," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(3), pages 232-249, September.
    15. Garima Malik & A. Sajeevan Rao, 2019. "Extended expectation-confirmation model to predict continued usage of ODR/ride hailing apps: role of perceived value and self-efficacy," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 461-482, December.
    16. Mariani, Marcello M. & Ek Styven, Maria & Teulon, Fréderic, 2021. "Explaining the intention to use digital personal data stores: An empirical study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    17. Rizal Edy Halim & Shinta Rahmani & Gita Gayatri & Asnan Furinto & Yudi Sutarso, 2022. "The Effectiveness of Product Sustainability Claims to Mitigate Negative Electronic Word of Mouth (N-eWOM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Lissitsa, Sabina & Laor, Tal, 2021. "Baby Boomers, Generation X and Generation Y: Identifying generational differences in effects of personality traits in on-demand radio use," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Liu, Hongfei & Jayawardhena, Chanaka & Osburg, Victoria-Sophie & Yoganathan, Vignesh & Cartwright, Severina, 2021. "Social sharing of consumption emotion in electronic word of mouth (eWOM): A cross-media perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 208-220.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liyuan Jiang & Quanxi Li & Xiaoding Wu, 2023. "The Impact of Clothing E-Store Image on Intention Based on Search and Purchase Phases: From the Perspective of Sustainable Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colmekcioglu, Nazan & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea & Okumus, Fevzi, 2022. "Generation, susceptibility, and response regarding negativity: An in-depth analysis on negative online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 235-250.
    2. Pahrudin Pahrudin & Tsung-Hua Hsieh & Li-Wei Liu & Chia-Chun Wang, 2023. "The Role of Information Sources on Tourist Behavior Post-Earthquake Disaster in Indonesia: A Stimulus–Organism–Response (SOR) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Chang, Hsin Hsin & Wong, Kit Hong & Shen, Yi An, 2022. "Effects of the consumer socialization process on content sharing on SNSs: Social comparison and anticipated emotions as moderators," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Agag, Gomaa & Ali Durrani, Baseer & Hassan Abdelmoety, Ziad & Mostafa Daher, Maya & Eid, Riyad, 2024. "Understanding the link between net promoter score and e-WOM behaviour on social media: The role of national culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Loureiro, Sandra M.C. & Cavallero, Luisa & Miranda, Francisco Javier, 2018. "Fashion brands on retail websites: Customer performance expectancy and e-word-of-mouth," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 131-141.
    6. Mukta Srivastava & Sreeram Sivaramakrishnan & Gordhan K. Saini, 2021. "The Relationship Between Electronic Word-of-Mouth and Consumer Engagement: An Exploratory Study," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 10(1), pages 66-81, January.
    7. Sakiyama, Ryo & Dony Dahana, Wirawan & Baumann, Chris & Ye, Mingqi, 2023. "Cross-industrial study on satisfaction-commitment-PWOM linkage: The role of competition, consumption visibility, and service relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Kagan, Maya & Lissitsa, Sabina, 2023. "Generations X, Y, Z: Attitudes toward social workers in the age of media technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Khodayari, Maryam, 2022. "Let us talk about something: The evolution of e-WOM from the past to the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 663-689.
    10. Liu, Hongfei & Jayawardhena, Chanaka & Shukla, Paurav & Osburg, Victoria-Sophie & Yoganathan, Vignesh, 2024. "Electronic word of mouth 2.0 (eWOM 2.0) – The evolution of eWOM research in the new age," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Fang, Mingyue & Nie, Huihua & Shen, Xinyi, 2023. "Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Hui, Xiang & Klein, Tobias & Stahl, Konrad, 2022. "Learning from Online Ratings," CEPR Discussion Papers 17006, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Edgardo Arturo Ayala Gaytán, 2009. "Social network externalities and price dispersion in online markets," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(2), pages 1-28, November.
    15. Joe Cox & Daniel Kaimann, 2013. "The Signaling Effect of Critics - Evidence from a Market for Experience Goods," Working Papers CIE 68, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    16. Chrysanthos Dellarocas & Charles A. Wood, 2008. "The Sound of Silence in Online Feedback: Estimating Trading Risks in the Presence of Reporting Bias," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 460-476, March.
    17. Ravi Bapna & Chrysanthos Dellarocas & Sarah Rice, 2010. "Vertically Differentiated Simultaneous Vickrey Auctions: Theory and Experimental Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(7), pages 1074-1092, July.
    18. Liuan Wang & Lu (Lucy) Yan & Tongxin Zhou & Xitong Guo & Gregory R. Heim, 2020. "Understanding Physicians’ Online-Offline Behavior Dynamics: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 537-555, June.
    19. Tobias Gesche, 2022. "Reference‐price shifts and customer antagonism: Evidence from reviews for online auctions," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 558-578, August.
    20. Nan Yang & Renyu Zhang, 2022. "Dynamic pricing and inventory management in the presence of online reviews," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(8), pages 3180-3197, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16104-:d:991212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.