IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v8y2015i03p324-331_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generational Differences Are Real and Useful

Author

Listed:
  • Campbell, W. Keith
  • Campbell, Stacy M.
  • Siedor, Lane E.
  • Twenge, Jean M.

Abstract

We propose that generational differences are meaningful despite some theoretical and methodological challenges (cf. Costanza & Finkelstein, 2015). We will address five main issues: operationalizing generations, measuring generational differences, theoretical models of generations, mechanisms of generational change, and the importance of science versus stereotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • Campbell, W. Keith & Campbell, Stacy M. & Siedor, Lane E. & Twenge, Jean M., 2015. "Generational Differences Are Real and Useful," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 324-331, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:8:y:2015:i:03:p:324-331_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942615000437/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dunaetz, David Robert & Gobrail, Mark & Howard, Jaye & Lord, Jasmine & Yun, Jaimie C., 2024. "Self-Leadership Practices and Beliefs in Nonprofit Organizations: Differences Between Leaders and Non-Leaders," OSF Preprints 6wrft, Center for Open Science.
    2. Maria Clara Kreis & Debra W. Moore, 2022. "The Phenomenon of Generational Cohort Differences in Life Satisfaction Reports," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(2), pages 1-1, June.
    3. Mihaela Simona Moise & Irene Gil-Saura & María-Eugenia Ruiz-Molina, 2020. "Implications of Value Co-Creation in Green Hotels: The Moderating Effect of Trip Purpose and Generational Cohort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Twenge, Jean M. & Campbell, W. Keith & Sherman, Ryne A., 2019. "Declines in vocabulary among American adults within levels of educational attainment, 1974–2016," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Alan C. Logan & Susan L. Prescott, 2022. "Planetary Health: We Need to Talk about Narcissism," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Nathalie Peña-García & David van der Woude & Augusto Rodríguez-Orejuela, 2022. "Recommend or Not: Is Generation the Key? A Perspective from the SOR Paradigm for Online Stores in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Dunaetz, David Robert & Yun, Jaimie C. & Lord, Jasmine & Howard, Jaye & Gobrail, Mark, 2023. "Self-Leadership, Seeking God’s Will, and Thriving," OSF Preprints q2m5t, Center for Open Science.
    8. Kelly Pledger Weeks & Caitlin Schaffert, 2019. "Generational Differences in Definitions of Meaningful Work: A Mixed Methods Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 1045-1061, June.
    9. Ana Moreira & Carla Tomás & Armanda Antunes, 2024. "The Mediating Effect of Affective Commitment on the Relationship between Competence Development and Turnover Intentions: Does This Relationship Depend on the Employee’s Generation?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Alkire (née Nasr), Linda & O'Connor, Genevieve E. & Myrden, Susan & Köcher, Sören, 2020. "Patient experience in the digital age: An investigation into the effect of generational cohorts," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    11. Melissa Bohnert & Pablo Gracia, 2021. "Emerging Digital Generations? Impacts of Child Digital Use on Mental and Socioemotional Well-Being across Two Cohorts in Ireland, 2007–2018," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(2), pages 629-659, April.
    12. Maximiano Ortiz-Pimentel & Carlos Molina & Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo, 2020. "Bibliometric assessment of papers on generations in management and business journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 445-469, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:8:y:2015:i:03:p:324-331_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.