IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i1p14-d1317330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Telework and Work Intensity: Insights from an Exploratory Study in Portugal during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Glória Rebelo

    (Iscte—Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Dinamia’ CET—Iscte, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Antonio Almeida

    (Faculty of Law, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Joao Pedra

    (Data Science and Analytics, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK)

Abstract

The expansion of teleworking and the digital transition movement have given companies and workers great flexibility, albeit with significant organisational consequences. The recent COVID-19 pandemic further reinforced the scale of this impact. Thus, the current research aims to understand whether the multiple dimensions of telework have impacted upon workers’ time management and work intensity through the unprecedented experiences during the pandemic and, in particular, to assess whether telework intensifies work, in what ways and the main reasons for this. The article analyses the literature on teleworking and work intensity and presents a documentary analysis on the subject, in addition to presenting the results of an exploratory study carried out in 2021 in Portugal which investigates the impact of teleworking on workers’ time management. The article underlines that although teleworking can increase a worker’s well-being by eliminating travel time, it presents several risks, namely it can intensify work through increased pressure to meet objectives and targets. Therefore, it is essential to develop research on the effects of telework, particularly assessing the relationship between telework and work intensification, as well as its effects on working conditions and workers’ well-being. This research will be an important resource for regulating labour laws and designing human resource management policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Glória Rebelo & Antonio Almeida & Joao Pedra, 2024. "Telework and Work Intensity: Insights from an Exploratory Study in Portugal during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:14-:d:1317330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/1/14/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/1/14/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erin Reid, 2015. "Embracing, Passing, Revealing, and the Ideal Worker Image: How People Navigate Expected and Experienced Professional Identities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 997-1017, August.
    2. Dharma Raju Bathini & George Mathew Kandathil, 2019. "An Orchestrated Negotiated Exchange: Trading Home-Based Telework for Intensified Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 411-423, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malik, Ashish & Mahadevan, Jasmin & Sharma, Piyush & Nguyen, Tuyet-Mai, 2021. "Masking, claiming and preventing innovation in cross-border B2B relationships: Neo-colonial frameworks of power in global IT industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 327-339.
    2. Erin A. Cech & William R. Rothwell, 2020. "LGBT Workplace Inequality in the Federal Workforce: Intersectional Processes, Organizational Contexts, and Turnover Considerations," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(1), pages 25-60, January.
    3. George Argyrous & Lyn Craig & Sara Rahman, 2017. "The Effect of a First Born Child on Work and Childcare Time Allocation: Pre-post Analysis of Australian Couples," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 831-851, March.
    4. Tachia Chin & Yi Shi & Manlio Giudice & Jianwei Meng & Zeyu Xing, 2023. "Working from anywhere: yin–yang cognition paradoxes of knowledge sharing and hiding for developing careers in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Sabrina Tanquerel & Marc Grau-Grau, 2023. "Untangling the characteristics of men who dare to break the “ideal worker” norm," Post-Print hal-04287291, HAL.
    6. Mona Zanhour & Dana McDaniel Sumpter, 2024. "The entrenchment of the ideal worker norm during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from working mothers in the United States," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 625-643, March.
    7. Reece Garcia, 2022. "Exploring the domestic division of labor when both parents are involuntarily working from home: The effects of the UK COVID pandemic," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1065-1081, July.
    8. Colleen Flaherty Manchester & Lisa M. Leslie & Patricia C. Dahm, 2019. "Bringing Home the Bacon: The Relationships among Breadwinner Role, Performance, and Pay," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 46-85, January.
    9. Devi Vijay, 2019. "Introduction to the special issue: changing nature of work and organizations in India," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 46(2), pages 93-97, June.
    10. Mathias, Blake D. & Williams, David W., 2018. "Giving up the hats? Entrepreneurs' role transitions and venture growth," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 261-277.
    11. Alison T. Wynn & Aliya Hamid Rao, 2020. "Failures of Flexibility: How Perceived Control Motivates the Individualization of Work–Life Conflict," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(1), pages 61-90, January.
    12. Yvonne Lott & Clare Kelliher & Heejung Chung, 2022. "Reflecting the changing world of work? A critique of existing survey measures and a proposal for capturing new ways of working," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(4), pages 457-473, November.
    13. Isabel Fernandez-Mateo & Sarah Kaplan, 2018. "Gender and Organization Science: Introduction to a Virtual Special Issue," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1229-1236, December.
    14. Carmelita Euline Ginting‐Carlström, 2025. "‘Who is the ideal woman?’: The subjectification of impoverished Javanese working mothers," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 136-160, January.
    15. Ioana Gutu & Camelia Nicoleta Medeleanu, 2023. "Assessing Teleworkforce and Electronic Leadership Favorable for an Online Workforce Sustainability Framework by Using PLS SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-32, September.
    16. Caroline Gatrell & Jamie J. Ladge & Gary N. Powell, 2024. "Profane Pregnant Bodies Versus Sacred Organizational Systems: Exploring Pregnancy Discrimination at Work (R2)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(3), pages 527-542, July.
    17. Rebecca Whiting & Gillian Symon, 2020. "Digi-Housekeeping: The Invisible Work of Flexibility," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(6), pages 1079-1096, December.
    18. Anna Matysiak & Agnieszka Kasperska & Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska, 2023. "Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Work From Home on Careers in the Post-Covid Context," Working Papers 2023-28, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    19. Hernán Darío Cortés-Pérez & Manuela Escobar-Sierra & Rafael Galindo-Monsalve, 2023. "Influence of Lifestyle and Cultural Traits on the Willingness to Telework: A Case Study in the Aburrá Valley, Medellín, Colombia," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(1), pages 206-222, February.
    20. Duanyi Yang & Erin L. Kelly & Laura D. Kubzansky & Lisa Berkman, 2023. "Working from Home and Worker Well-being: New Evidence from Germany," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 76(3), pages 504-531, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:14-:d:1317330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.