IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v11y2021i4p117-d658851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Social Responsibility through SDGs: Preliminary Results from a Pilot Study in Italian Universities

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Costa

    (Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Economia, Università del Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Alessandra Tafuro

    (Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Economia, Università del Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Marco Benvenuto

    (Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Economia, Università del Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Carmine Viola

    (Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Economia, Università del Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

Abstract

Background: In the broad scientific debate on the integration of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the strategic planning of universities and on the use of monitoring the results of the strategy of the indicators relating to the pursuit of sustainable development goals (SDGs), there is a lack of studies demonstrating the effective degree of institutionalization of CSR in universities. Methods: This analysis constitutes a pilot study relating to the Italian university context. The study was carried out through an analysis on the contents of the three-year strategic performance plans (2020–2022) drawn up by individual universities and compulsorily published on the national portal of the Public Function Department , as required by article 10, paragraph 1, letter (a) of Legislative Decree 150/2009. A matrix was made with the information extracted by the documents and relative to the presence of the SDGs in the strategic performance plan. Consequently, using a Likert scale, the different degrees of institutionalization of CSR in the strategic plan of the universities were coded. Results: The results of the pilot study highlighted that the strategic planning of Italian universities’ CSR practices and the challenges of sustainable development are hardly ever systematically addressed. Therefore, there is a low degree of institutionalization of CSR in the Italian university system, even though the literature shows a high cultural and scientific commitment to establish university and post-graduate study courses with corporate social responsibility and sustainable development content and an increasing trend in the use of the accountability tools such as the social report or the sustainability report. Conclusions: It is necessary to share the results of scientific research on CSR and SDGs with the government and governance bodies of universities in order to harmonize the CSR and sustainability culture of these bodies with that of academics.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Costa & Alessandra Tafuro & Marco Benvenuto & Carmine Viola, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility through SDGs: Preliminary Results from a Pilot Study in Italian Universities," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:117-:d:658851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/4/117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/4/117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmela Gulluscio & Patrizia Torrecchia, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the University Courses in Italy: An Empirical Analysis," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Maria Aluchna & Samuel O. Idowu (ed.), The Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility, chapter 0, pages 139-165, Springer.
    2. Amr ElAlfy & Nicholas Palaschuk & Dina El-Bassiouny & Jeffrey Wilson & Olaf Weber, 2020. "Scoping the Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Research in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Claudiu George Bocean & Catalina Soriana Sitnikov & Dalia Simion & Sorin Tudor & Monica Logofatu, 2020. "Current Approaches and New Paradigms in Educational Institutions Social Responsibility," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Samuel O. Idowu & Cătălina Sitnikov (ed.), Essential Issues in Corporate Social Responsibility, pages 11-27, Springer.
    4. Jonathan P. Doh & Peter Tashman, 2014. "Half a World Away: The Integration and Assimilation of Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Sustainable Development in Business School Curricula," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 131-142, May.
    5. Irena Slavova & Yovka Bankova, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility In Business And Management University Education: The Relevancy To The Business Practices In Bulgaria," European Journal of Business and Economics, Central Bohemia University, vol. 10(2), pages 6971:10-697, January.
    6. Setó-Pamies, Dolors & Domingo-Vernis, Misericordia & Rabassa-Figueras, Noemí, 2011. "Corporate social responsibility in management education: Current status in Spanish universities," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(5), pages 604-620, September.
    7. Dongyong Zhang & Stephen Morse & Qiaoyun Ma, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development in China: Current Status and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Samuel O. Idowu & Cătălina Sitnikov (ed.), 2020. "Essential Issues in Corporate Social Responsibility," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, Springer, number 978-3-030-39229-1, March.
    9. Mahalaxmi Adhikariparajuli & Abeer Hassan & Benedetta Siboni, 2021. "CSR Implication and Disclosure in Higher Education: Uncovered Points. Results from a Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    10. Giuseppe Nicolò & Natalia Aversano & Giuseppe Sannino & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini, 2021. "Investigating Web-Based Sustainability Reporting in Italian Public Universities in the Era of Covid-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergei G. Vagin & Elena I. Kostyukova & Natalia E. Spiridonova & Tatiana M. Vorozheykina, 2022. "Financial Risk Management Based on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Interests of Sustainable Development," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Adamu Pantamee Abdurrahman & Shafi Mohamad & Amena Sibghatullah & Ooi Chee Keong & Vu Minh Hieu & Putri Mutira, 2022. "Role of Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibilities in addressing Sustainable Development Goals: Evidence from Malaysian Manufacturing Firms," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(3), pages 247-256, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asif Khan & Chih-Cheng Chen & Kwanrat Suanpong & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Santhaya Kittikowit & Shih-Chih Chen, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Second-Order Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Rahul Singh Gautam & Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu & Shailesh Rastogi & Jyoti Mehndiratta Kappal & Hitesh Patole & Aman Pushp, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility Funding and Its Impact on India’s Sustainable Development: Using the Poverty Score as a Moderator," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Giorgia Miotto & Marc Polo López & Josep Rom Rodríguez, 2019. "Gender Equality and UN Sustainable Development Goals: Priorities and Correlations in the Top Business Schools’ Communication and Legitimation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. A. G. Olabi & Khaled Obaideen & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Maryam Nooman AlMallahi & Nabila Shehata & Abdul Hai Alami & Ayman Mdallal & Asma Ali Murah Hassan & Enas Taha Sayed, 2023. "Wind Energy Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study on London Array," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Rajiv Nair & P.K Viswanathan & Bettina Lynda Bastian, 2021. "Reprioritising Sustainable Development Goals in the Post-COVID-19 Global Context: Will a Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility Regime Help?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Lopez, Belen & Rangel, Celia & Fernández, Manuel, 2022. "The impact of corporate social responsibility strategy on the management and governance axis for sustainable growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 690-698.
    7. Celia Rangel-Pérez & Belen López & Manuel Fernández, 2024. "A strategic sustainability model for global luxury companies in the management of CO2 emissions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1597-1615, September.
    8. Minh Van Nguyen & Khanh Duy Ha & Chien Thanh Phan, 2024. "Sustainable development during economic uncertainty: What drives large construction firms to perform corporate social responsibility?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2838-2851, July.
    9. Eglė Stonkutė & Jolita Vveinhardt & Włodzimierz Sroka, 2018. "Training the CSR Sensitive Mind-Set: The Integration of CSR into the Training of Business Administration Professionals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Beck, Donizete & Ferasso, Marcos, 2023. "How can Stakeholder Capitalism contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals? A Cross-network Literature Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    11. Rohit Agrawal & Abhijit Majumdar & Kirty Majumdar & Rakesh D. Raut & Balkrishna E. Narkhede, 2022. "Attaining sustainable development goals (SDGs) through supply chain practices and business strategies: A systematic review with bibliometric and network analyses," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3669-3687, November.
    12. Fernanda Andrade de Xavier & Pranab Mukhopadhyay, 2023. "Can Fiscal Transfers Help India Meet Its SDG Goals?," South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, , vol. 12(2), pages 218-249, December.
    13. Lixiang Wang & Weian Li & Lujun Qi, 2020. "Stakeholder Pressures and Corporate Environmental Strategies: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Mark Ray Reavis & Jack E. Tucci, 2020. "Sustainability Effort Acceleration as Measured by Increased Propensity of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 121-121, December.
    15. Alla Mostepaniuk & Elsie Nasr & Razan Ibrahim Awwad & Sameer Hamdan & Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani, 2022. "Managing a Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Juan Abello-Romero & Claudio Mancilla & Katherine Restrepo & Walter Sáez & Ivette Durán-Seguel & Francisco Ganga-Contreras, 2024. "Sustainability Reporting in the University Context—A Review and Analysis of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Hannah Jun & Seoyoung Moon, 2021. "An Analysis of Sustainability Integration in Business School Curricula: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Patrizia Di Tullio & Matteo La Torre & Michele Antonio Rea, 2021. "Social Media for Engaging and Educating: From Universities’ Sustainability Reporting to Dialogic Communication," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Abdulhakeem Raji & Abeer Hassan, 2021. "Sustainability and Stakeholder Awareness: A Case Study of a Scottish University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Yujie Wang & Hong Chen & Ruyin Long & Shiyan Jiang & Bei Liu, 2022. "Evaluation of Occupational Health and Safety Management of Listed Companies in China’s Energy Industry Based on the Combined Weight-Cloud Model: From the Perspective of FPE Information Disclosure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:117-:d:658851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.