IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8313-d857811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Occupational Health and Safety Management of Listed Companies in China’s Energy Industry Based on the Combined Weight-Cloud Model: From the Perspective of FPE Information Disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Yujie Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030600, China)

  • Hong Chen

    (School of Business, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
    Institute of National Security and Green Development, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Ruyin Long

    (School of Business, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
    Institute of National Security and Green Development, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Shiyan Jiang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Bei Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

Protecting labor safety and health and actively carrying out occupational safety and health management (OSHM) is a common need worldwide, and it is also one of the important efforts of Chinese enterprises under the background of promoting the implementation of the Healthy China strategy. Based on in-depth thinking on the current stage of OHSM, this study incorporated “management framework, management process, management effectiveness” (FPE) into an integrated framework and constructed an FPE evaluation system for enterprise OHSM. This study innovatively collected and refined FPE information from the perspective of information disclosure and used the combined weight cloud model to evaluate the occupational health and safety management level (OHSML) of 69 listed companies in China’s energy industry from 2009–2019. The results showed the following. (1) The OHSML of most listed companies in China’s energy industry was still at a low-end level. Among the companies that have issued relevant information reports, only 5.58% (S = 30) of the sample companies’ OHSML were at an acceptable level (Level IV) or declarable level (Level V). The OHSML comprehensive evaluation level of 92.56% (S = 498) of the sample companies was between the transitional level (Level III) and the improved level (Level II). (2) During 2009–2019, although the annual OHSML of listed companies in China’s energy industry showed an upward trend, the growth rate was low, and even the OHSML of some listed companies in the energy industry showed the characteristics of reduced fluctuations. (3) From the perspective of the PFT three-dimensional subsystem level of OHSM, the evaluation level of the governance framework subsystem was the highest, whereas the evaluation level of the management process subsystem and the management effectiveness subsystem were relatively low. Finally, according to the relevant results, some suggestions were proposed to improve the OHSML of listed companies in China’s energy industry. These findings can provide guidance for companies to improve their OSHM performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yujie Wang & Hong Chen & Ruyin Long & Shiyan Jiang & Bei Liu, 2022. "Evaluation of Occupational Health and Safety Management of Listed Companies in China’s Energy Industry Based on the Combined Weight-Cloud Model: From the Perspective of FPE Information Disclosure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8313-:d:857811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8313/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8313/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fa, Ziwei & Li, Xinchun, 2021. "From aggregate to part: Study on the change of coal mine safety records in China under the intervention of risk pre-control management system," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Konstantinos Evangelinos & Stefanos Fotiadis & Antonis Skouloudis & Nadeem Khan & Foteini Konstandakopoulou & Ioannis Nikolaou & Shaun Lundy, 2018. "Occupational health and safety disclosures in sustainability reports: An overview of trends among corporate leaders," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 961-970, September.
    3. Dongyong Zhang & Stephen Morse & Qiaoyun Ma, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development in China: Current Status and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Wang, Yujie & Chen, Hong & Long, Ruyin & Liu, Bei & Jiang, Shiyan & Yang, Xingxing & Yang, Menghua, 2021. "Evaluating green development level of mineral resource-listed companies: Based on a “dark green” assessment framework," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Pan Guo & Xiaofeng Li & Yanlin Jia & Xu Zhang, 2020. "Cloud Model-Based Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Entrepreneurs’ Uncertainty Tolerance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yeguan Yu, 2023. "The Impact of Financial System on Carbon Intensity: From the Perspective of Digitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiang-Fei Ma & Ru Zhang & Yi-Fan Ruan, 2023. "How to Evaluate the Level of Green Development Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Rui Zhang & Yong Ma & Jie Ren, 2022. "Green Development Performance Evaluation Based on Dual Perspectives of Level and Efficiency: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Lixiang Wang & Weian Li & Lujun Qi, 2020. "Stakeholder Pressures and Corporate Environmental Strategies: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Yanqing Wang & Hong Chen & Robert L. K. Tiong, 2023. "An exploratory research on the maturity level of public's emergency capability," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(1), pages 325-355, October.
    5. Fa, Ziwei & Yan, Ke & Qiu, Zunxiang & Zhang, Yueqian & Liu, Quanlong & Li, Xinchun, 2024. "Who are root hazards? A research on optimization of safety training management in coal mine enterprises from data-driven perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Liu, Yu & Khan, Ali Junaid & Iqbal, Jawad & Hameed, Waseem Ul & Ahmed, Tanveer, 2023. "Strategic management of natural resources through human, technological, and institutional resources: Sustainable curing the resource curse," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    7. Feifei Zhang & Jin-young Jung, 2020. "Changes in the Influence of Social Responsibility Activities on Corporate Value over 10 Years in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Maura Campra & Paolo Esposito & Valerio Brescia, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and technological perspectives in healthcare: An exploratory analysis of the evolution of the anti‐corruption system through multiple case studies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2816-2829, November.
    9. Muddassar Sarfraz & Ilhan Ozturk & Sunghoon Yoo & Muhammad Ali Raza & Heesup Han, 2023. "Toward a new understanding of environmental and financial performance through corporate social responsibility, green innovation, and sustainable development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Wiśniewska, Agnieszka & Liczmańska-Kopcewicz, Katarzyna & Pypłacz, Paula, 2022. "Antecedents of young adults’ willingness to support brands investing in renewable energy sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 177-187.
    11. Yongna Zou & Qingping Cheng & Hanyu Jin & Xuefu Pu, 2023. "Evaluation of Green Agricultural Development and Its Influencing Factors under the Framework of Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study of Lincang City, an Underdeveloped Mountainous Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Antonio Costa & Alessandra Tafuro & Marco Benvenuto & Carmine Viola, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility through SDGs: Preliminary Results from a Pilot Study in Italian Universities," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, October.
    13. Alicia Ramírez-Orellana & María del Carmen Valls Martínez & Mayra Soledad Grasso, 2021. "Using Higher-Order Constructs to Estimate Health-Disease Status: The Effect of Health System Performance and Sustainability," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Shanshan Li & Yujie Wang & Yuannan Zheng & Jichao Geng & Junqi Zhu, 2022. "Research on Energy Saving and Environmental Protection Management Evaluation of Listed Companies in Energy Industry Based on Portfolio Weight Cloud Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Mariappanadar, Sugumar & Maurer, Iris & Kramar, Robin & Muller-Camen, Michael, 2022. "Is it a sententious claim? An examination of the quality of occupational health, safety and well-being disclosures in global reporting initiative reports across industries and countries," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2).
    16. Runyuan Jia & Juan Antonio Sánchez-Sáez & Francisco Segado Segado, 2023. "The Impact of the China Open 500 Event on Sense of Community: Comparisons of Volunteers’ Pre- and Post-Event Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Albertina Paula Monteiro & Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán, 2022. "Labour Practice, Decent Work and Human Rights Performance and Reporting: The Impact of Women Managers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 523-542, October.
    18. Jonas Steel & Lode Godderis & Jeroen Luyten, 2018. "Methodological Challenges in the Economic Evaluation of Occupational Health and Safety Programmes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, November.
    19. Albertina Paula Monteiro & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán & María Garrido-Ruso & Cristina Aibar-Guzmán, 2021. "Employee-Related Disclosure: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-38, May.
    20. Wang, Yujie & Sun, Qingqing & Wu, Jingjun & Han, Shuai & Zhang, Ruonan & Jiang, Shiyan & Gu, Xiao, 2023. "Research on the low carbon development path of China's coal industry under carbon peaking & carbon neutral target: Based on the RCPs-SSPs framework," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8313-:d:857811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.