IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v11y2021i4p150-d697778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reprioritising Sustainable Development Goals in the Post-COVID-19 Global Context: Will a Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility Regime Help?

Author

Listed:
  • Rajiv Nair

    (Department of Management, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, Kollam 690525, India)

  • P.K Viswanathan

    (Department of Management, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, Kollam 690525, India)

  • Bettina Lynda Bastian

    (USEK Business School, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh 1200, Lebanon)

Abstract

The impact of COVID-19 on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) continues to be researched. Initial signals warn of significant setbacks in achieving SDG targets by 2030. The achievement of SDGs could abet improved protection from future pandemics. This article suggests reprioritizing SDGs to facilitate a more robust global response to future pandemics. Specifically, we recommend that SDGs 3, 6, 5 and 4 (in that order) are prioritized in order to optimize efforts at a more inclusive and resilient socio-economic recovery post-pandemic. This paper suggests that mandatory CSR regimes enable governments, in combination with corporate fiscal resources, to influence the selection and progress of these SDGs. The case of India’s mandatory CSR regime is employed to illustrate our position. This study extends the debate on SDGs by raising the possibility of universal concentration on a few critical SDGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajiv Nair & P.K Viswanathan & Bettina Lynda Bastian, 2021. "Reprioritising Sustainable Development Goals in the Post-COVID-19 Global Context: Will a Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility Regime Help?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:150-:d:697778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/4/150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/4/150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Doh & Suzana Rodrigues & Ayse Saka-Helmhout & Mona Makhija, 2017. "International business responses to institutional voids," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(3), pages 293-307, April.
    2. He, Hongwei & Harris, Lloyd, 2020. "The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 176-182.
    3. Murale Venugopalan & Bettina Lynda Bastian & P. K. Viswanathan, 2021. "The Role of Multi-Actor Engagement for Women’s Empowerment and Entrepreneurship in Kerala, India," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Amr ElAlfy & Nicholas Palaschuk & Dina El-Bassiouny & Jeffrey Wilson & Olaf Weber, 2020. "Scoping the Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Research in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Mair, Johanna & Marti, Ignasi, 2009. "Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 419-435, September.
    6. Arpita Ghosh, 2017. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Runa Sarkar & Annapurna Shaw (ed.), Essays on Sustainability and Management, chapter 0, pages 153-175, Springer.
    7. Laura Galuppo & Mara Gorli & Giuseppe Scaratti & Cesare Kaneklin, 2014. "Building social sustainability: multi-stakeholder processes and conflict management," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(4), pages 685-701, September.
    8. Ivete Delai & Sérgio Takahashi, 2011. "Sustainability measurement system: a reference model proposal," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 438-471, August.
    9. repec:eme:srjpps:v:6:y:2010:i:2:p:438-471 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Nayan Mitra & Bhaskar Chatterjee, 2020. "India’s Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) With Respect to the CSR Mandate in the Companies Act, 2013," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Samuel O. Idowu & René Schmidpeter & Liangrong Zu (ed.), The Future of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, pages 383-396, Springer.
    11. Nazamul Hoque & Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman & Rafiqul Islam Molla & Abu Hanifa Md. Noman & Mohammad Zahid Hossain Bhuiyan, 2018. "Is corporate social responsibility pursuing pristine business goals for sustainable development?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1130-1142, November.
    12. Jintao Lu & Mengshang Liang & Chong Zhang & Dan Rong & Hailing Guan & Kristina Mazeikaite & Justas Streimikis, 2021. "Assessment of corporate social responsibility by addressing sustainable development goals," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 686-703, March.
    13. Marko Hakovirta & Navodya Denuwara, 2020. "How COVID-19 Redefines the Concept of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-4, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Izabella Lecka & Janusz Gudowski & Tomasz Wołowiec, 2022. "CSR in Poland and the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals in the Energy Sector during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Nadia A. Abdelmegeed Abdelwahed & Bettina Lynda Bastian & Bronwyn P. Wood, 2022. "Women, Entrepreneurship, and Sustainability: The Case of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Preuss, Lutz & Vazquez-Brust, Diego & Yakovleva, Natalia & Foroughi, Hamid & Mutti, Diana, 2022. "When social movements close institutional voids: Triggers, processes, and consequences for multinational enterprises," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    2. Juan M. Gil-Barragan & María José López-Sánchez, 2021. "The Fast Lane of Internationalization of Latin American SMEs: A Location-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Sietze Vellema & Greetje Schouten & Rob Van Tulder, 2020. "Partnering capacities for inclusive development in food provisioning," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(6), pages 710-727, November.
    4. Heeks, Richard & Gomez-Morantes, Juan Erasmo & Graham, Mark & Howson, Kelle & Mungai, Paul & Nicholson, Brian & Van Belle, Jean-Paul, 2021. "Digital platforms and institutional voids in developing countries: The case of ride-hailing markets," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele & Peprah, Augustine Awuah & Amartey, Abednego Okoe & Rajwani, Tazeeb, 2020. "Institutional voids and firms' resource commitment in emerging markets: A review and future research agenda," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(3).
    6. Peprah, Augustine Awuah & Atarah, Bede Akorige & Kumodzie-Dussey, Makafui Kwame, 2024. "Nonmarket strategy and legitimacy in institutionally voided environments: The case of Jumia, an African e-commerce giant," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2).
    7. Istipliler, Baris & Bort, Suleika & Woywode, Michael, 2023. "Flowers of adversity: Institutional constraints and innovative SMEs in transition economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Manning, Stephan & Vavilov, Stanislav, 2023. "Global development agenda meets local opportunities: The rise of development-focused entrepreneurship support," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    9. Milou Derks & Christina Bidmon & Francesca Ciulli, 2024. "Circular e‐waste ecosystems in necessity‐driven contexts: The impact of formal institutional voids," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3733-3747, May.
    10. Bustamante, Carla V. & Mingo, Santiago & Matusik, Sharon F., 2021. "Institutions and venture capital market creation: The case of an emerging market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1-12.
    11. Lexis Alexander Tetteh & Cletus Agyenim‐Boateng & Samuel Nana Yaw Simpson, 2024. "Institutional pressures and accountability processes in pursuit of sustainable development goals: Insights from Ghanaian indigenous oil companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 89-107, January.
    12. Brieger, Steven A. & Chowdhury, Farzana & Hechavarría, Diana M. & Muralidharan, Etayankara & Pathak, Saurav & Lam, Yan Tong, 2022. "Digitalization, institutions and new venture internationalization," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4).
    13. Venancio Tauringana & Ishmael Tingbani & Godwin Okafor & Widin B. Sha'ven, 2021. "Terrorism and global business performance," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5636-5658, October.
    14. Onuklu, Atilla & Hill, Theodore (TL) & Darendeli, Izzet S. & Genc, Omer F., 2021. "Poison or antidote: How subnational informal institutions exacerbate and ameliorate institutional voids," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).
    15. Hartwell, Christopher A. & Devinney, Timothy, 2021. "Populism, political risk, and pandemics: The challenges of political leadership for business in a post-COVID world," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(4).
    16. Alaydi, Sharif & Buck, Trevor & Tang, Yee Kwan, 2021. "Strategic responses to extreme institutional challenges: An MNE case study in the Palestinian mobile phone sector," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    17. Michela Piccarozzi & Cecilia Silvestri & Patrizio Morganti, 2021. "COVID-19 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, March.
    18. Wonhyuk Cho & Winda Dwi Melisa, 2021. "Citizen Coproduction and Social Media Communication: Delivering a Municipal Government’s Urban Services through Digital Participation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, June.
    19. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    20. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:150-:d:697778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.