IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024ispecialap877-893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness University-Based Special Purpose Entities in the Context of Stakeholder Relationship Management Including Value Creation for Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Malwina Szarek
  • Hubert Pachciarek

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to explore the importance of managing relationships with stakeholders of university-based special purpose entities, taking into account the creation of expected values for them, in improving the effectiveness of these entities. Design/Methodology/Approach: The quantitative research results using a questionnaire survey conducted among managers of university-based special purpose entities in Poland are presented. The data obtained by means of a survey questionnaire were subjected to statistical analysis using non-parametric methods. This made it possible to verify the hypothesis and carry out inference. Findings: Based on the collected research material and the analyses carried out, it was proven that stakeholder relationship management, taking into account value creation for stakeholders, is positively related to the effectiveness of university-based special purpose entities. University-based special purpose entities characterised by distinctive effectiveness are aware of the impact of their key stakeholders on the activities of the SPE, try to know the expectations of different stakeholders towards the SPE, take into account the consequences of not meeting the expectations of different stakeholders, and contact researchers more often. Practical Implications: The article attempts to clarify the untapped potential of SPEs for the commercialisation of research results, which should interest not only SPE managers, but also representatives of the authorities of scientific entities setting up SPEs. Developing a set of effectiveness measures will facilitate decision-making regarding the creation or retention of university-based special purpose entities by indicating their role in the innovation ecosystem and identifying their contribution to the university's development and collaboration with the business community. Adequate measures will allow managers of university-based special purpose entities to demonstrate to their superiors the effects of their work and help them better manage their relationship with the university. Originality/Value: The article fills a research gap in the effectiveness of university-based special purpose entities, particularly concerning the management of stakeholder relations and the creation of expected value for them.

Suggested Citation

  • Malwina Szarek & Hubert Pachciarek, 2024. "Effectiveness University-Based Special Purpose Entities in the Context of Stakeholder Relationship Management Including Value Creation for Stakeholders," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special A), pages 877-893.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:speciala:p:877-893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3753/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uwe Cantner & Philip Doerr & Maximilian Goethner & Matthias Huegel & Martin Kalthaus, 2024. "A procedural perspective on academic spin-off creation: the changing relative importance of the academic and the commercial sphere," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1555-1590, April.
    2. Aluchna, Maria & Roszkowska-Menkes, Maria & Kamiński, Bogumił & Bosek-Rak, Dominika, 2022. "Do institutional investors encourage firm to social disclosure? The stakeholder salience perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 674-682.
    3. Alejandro Bengoa & Amaia Maseda & Txomin Iturralde & Gloria Aparicio, 2021. "A bibliometric review of the technology transfer literature," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1514-1550, October.
    4. Matthew Hall & Yuval Millo & Emily Barman, 2015. "Who and What Really Counts? Stakeholder Prioritization and Accounting for Social Value," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(7), pages 907-934, November.
    5. Birgit Helene Jevnaker & Bisrat Agegnehu Misganaw, 2022. "Technology transfer offices and the formation of academic spin-off entrepreneurial teams," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9-10), pages 977-1000, October.
    6. Huan Li & Xi Yang & Xinlan Cai, 2022. "Academic spin-off activities and research performance: the mediating role of research collaboration," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1037-1069, August.
    7. David J. Jefferson & Magali Maida & Alexander Farkas & Monica Alandete-Saez & Alan B. Bennett, 2017. "Technology transfer in the Americas: common and divergent practices among major research universities and public sector institutions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 1307-1333, December.
    8. Caterina Tantalo & Richard L. Priem, 2016. "Value creation through stakeholder synergy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 314-329, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ishrat Ali & Griffin W. Cottle, 2021. "Reconceptualizing Entrepreneurial Performance: The Creation and Destruction of Value from a Stakeholder Capabilities Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 781-796, May.
    2. Andrew Crane & Dirk Matten, 2021. "COVID‐19 and the Future of CSR Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 280-284, January.
    3. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    4. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    5. Ting Qian & Caoyuan Yang, 2023. "State-Owned Equity Participation and Corporations’ ESG Performance in China: The Mediating Role of Top Management Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Zou, Chen & Huang, Yongchun & Hu, Shiliang & Huang, Zhan, 2023. "Government participation in low-carbon technology transfer: An evolutionary game study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Pruthiranjan Dwibedi & Debasis Pahi & Antarjyami Sahu, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of environmental, social and governance research: A bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3745-3767, September.
    8. Richard Yeaw Chong Seow, 2024. "Determinants of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2314-2330, March.
    9. Hannah Charlotte Joos, 2019. "Influences on managerial perceptions of stakeholder salience: two decades of research in review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 3-37, February.
    10. Kentaro Azuma & Akira Higashida, 2024. "Climate change disclosure and evolving institutional investor salience: Roles of the Principles for Responsible Investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3669-3686, May.
    11. Rayed Obaid Hammoud Alobaid & Ameen Qasem & Adel Ali Al-Qadasi, 2024. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Firm Investment Efficiency: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-25, August.
    12. Mir Dost & Waheed Ali Umrani, 2024. "Managerial Proactiveness, Frugal Innovation and Firm Performance," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 33(2), pages 393-417, May.
    13. Bai Xue & Zhuang Zhang & Pingli Li, 2020. "Corporate environmental performance, environmental management and firm risk," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1074-1096, March.
    14. Gastón Reyes, 2023. "The All-Stakeholders-Considered Case for Corporate Beneficence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 37-55, November.
    15. Ameen Qasem & Shaker Dahan AL-Duais & Wan Nordin Wan-Hussin & Hasan Mohamad Bamahros & Abdulsalam Alquhaif & Murad Thomran, 2022. "Institutional Ownership Types and ESG Reporting: The Case of Saudi Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Schembri, Joe & Tang, Yee Kwan & Fletcher, Margaret & Dimitratos, Pavlos, 2019. "How do European trade promotion organisations manage their stakeholders?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    17. Katherine Sugar & Janette Webb, 2022. "Value for Money: Local Authority Action on Clean Energy for Net Zero," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Modic, Dolores & Suklan, Jana, 2023. "Intellectual property coordinators' cohorts: A study into the imprints in university technology transfer," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    19. Gaoke Liao & Peng Hou & Xiaoyan Shen & Khaldoon Albitar, 2021. "The impact of economic policy uncertainty on stock returns: The role of corporate environmental responsibility engagement," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4386-4392, July.
    20. Liang, Jinma & Zhang, Yicheng & Li, Yuanheng, 2024. "The role of ESG scores in ESG fund performance and institutional investor selection," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    University-based special purpose entities (SPE); stakeholders theory; commercialization of research results.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:speciala:p:877-893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.