IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v188y2023i1d10.1007_s10551-022-05224-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The All-Stakeholders-Considered Case for Corporate Beneficence

Author

Listed:
  • Gastón Reyes

    (Glasgow Caledonian New York College)

Abstract

In ways accentuated by the global coronavirus pandemic, corporations constitute vital instruments of the acts of beneficence needed by the people of the world to make progress in public health and increase collective and individual well-being. This article contributes to understanding the variety of moral forces that may lead corporations to commit acts of beneficence, including Friedman’s business case for corporate beneficence, the duty of beneficence as developed by business ethicists, and Dunfee’s social contract account of corporate obligation. Whereas Mejia recently contributed to scholarship on corporate beneficence by expressly adopting shareholder primacy’s conception of corporate governance, this article embraces a stakeholder-oriented, managerialist picture of corporate governance. I extend the literature on beneficence by incorporating what I argue is the intuition underlying Dunfee’s contractualist formula of minimal contribution, namely that management’s duty to do good is awakened and unshackled to the extent management judges the corporation can afford to commit acts of beneficence, all stakeholders considered. The all-stakeholders-considered case for corporate beneficence compels management to act, I argue, when inaction would undermine the moral integrity of managers personally committed to promoting the well-being of humanity.

Suggested Citation

  • Gastón Reyes, 2023. "The All-Stakeholders-Considered Case for Corporate Beneficence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 37-55, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:188:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-022-05224-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05224-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-022-05224-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-022-05224-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wim Dubbink, 2018. "The Bystander in Commercial Life: Obliged by Beneficence or Rescue?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Agle, Bradley R. & Donaldson, Thomas & Freeman, R. Edward & Jensen, Michael C. & Mitchell, Ronald K. & Wood, Donna J., 2008. "Dialogue: Toward Superior Stakeholder Theory," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 153-190, April.
    3. Mejia, Santiago, 2021. "Which Duties of Beneficence Should Agents Discharge on Behalf of Principals? A Reflection through Shareholder Primacy," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 421-449, July.
    4. Donaldson, Thomas, 1992. "The Language of International Corporate Ethics," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 271-281, July.
    5. David Ohreen & Roger Petry, 2012. "Imperfect Duties and Corporate Philanthropy: A Kantian Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 367-381, March.
    6. White, Stuart, 2000. "Review Article: Social Rights and Social Contract—Political Theory and the New Welfare Politics," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 507-532, July.
    7. Scholz, Markus & de los Reyes, Gastón & Smith, N. Craig, 2019. "The Enduring Potential of Justified Hypernorms," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(3), pages 317-342, July.
    8. Tobey Scharding, 2019. "Individual Actions and Corporate Moral Responsibility: A (Reconstituted) Kantian Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 929-942, February.
    9. Jeffrey S. Harrison & Douglas A. Bosse & Robert A. Phillips, 2010. "Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 58-74, January.
    10. Heath, Joseph & Moriarty, Jeffrey & Norman, Wayne, 2010. "Business Ethics and (or as) Political Philosophy," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 427-452, July.
    11. Dunfee, Thomas W., 2006. "Do Firms with Unique Competencies for Rescuing Victims of Human Catastrophes Have Special Obligations? Corporate Responsibility and the Aids Catastrophe in Sub-Saharan Africa," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 185-210, April.
    12. R. Edward Freeman, 2010. "Managing for Stakeholders: Trade-offs or Value Creation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 7-9, August.
    13. Buchanan, Allen, 1996. "Perfecting Imperfect Duties: Collective Action to Create Moral Obligations," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 27-42, January.
    14. Nien-hê Hsieh, 2009. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Priority of Shareholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(4), pages 553-560, October.
    15. Andrews, Kenneth R, 1972. "Public Responsibility in the Private Corporation," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 135-145, April.
    16. Hendry, John, 2001. "Missing the Target: Normative Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Governance Debate," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 159-176, January.
    17. Amy Maxmen, 2021. "The fight to manufacture COVID vaccines in lower-income countries," Nature, Nature, vol. 597(7877), pages 455-457, September.
    18. Amy L. MacArthur, 2019. "Kantian Group Agency," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 917-927, February.
    19. Dunfee, Thomas W., 1991. "Business Ethics and Extant Social Contracts," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 23-51, January.
    20. Jones, Thomas M. & Felps, Will, 2013. "Stakeholder Happiness Enhancement: A Neo-Utilitarian Objective for the Modern Corporation," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 349-379, July.
    21. Caterina Tantalo & Richard L. Priem, 2016. "Value creation through stakeholder synergy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 314-329, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ishrat Ali & Griffin W. Cottle, 2021. "Reconceptualizing Entrepreneurial Performance: The Creation and Destruction of Value from a Stakeholder Capabilities Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 781-796, May.
    2. Jeffrey S. Harrison & Andrew C. Wicks, 2021. "Harmful Stakeholder Strategies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 405-419, March.
    3. Thomas Donaldson, 2023. "Value creation and CSR," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1255-1275, August.
    4. Mehtab Alam & Fu-Ren Lin, 2022. "Internalizing Sustainability into Research Practices of Higher Education Institutions: Case of a Research University in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Elisabet Garriga, 2014. "Beyond Stakeholder Utility Function: Stakeholder Capability in the Value Creation Process," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(4), pages 489-507, April.
    6. Mujtaba Ahsan, 2020. "Entrepreneurship and Ethics in the Sharing Economy: A Critical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 19-33, January.
    7. André Laplume & Kent Walker & Zhou Zhang & Xin Yu, 2021. "Incumbent Stakeholder Management Performance and New Entry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 629-644, December.
    8. Yafet Yosafet Wilben Rissy, 2021. "The stakeholder model: its relevance, concept, and application in the Indonesian banking sector," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 219-231, September.
    9. Vladislav Valentinov, 2023. "Stakeholder Theory: Toward a Classical Institutional Economics Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88, November.
    10. Sefa Hayibor, 2017. "Is Fair Treatment Enough? Augmenting the Fairness-Based Perspective on Stakeholder Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 43-64, January.
    11. Jennifer Lees-Marshment & Aimee Dinnin Huff & Neil Bendle, 2020. "A Social Commons Ethos in Public Policy-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(4), pages 761-778, November.
    12. Brink, Alexander, 2011. "Spezifische Investitionen als Legitimationsgrundlage für Stakeholderansprüche," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 65(1), pages 50-68.
    13. Simon Norris & Julia Hagenbeck & Stefan Schaltegger, 2021. "Linking sustainable business models and supply chains — Toward an integrated value creation framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3960-3974, December.
    14. Robert Strand & R. Freeman, 2015. "Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage: The Theory and Practice of Stakeholder Engagement in Scandinavia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 65-85, March.
    15. Anandasivam Gopal & Brad N Greenwood, 2017. "Traders, guns, and money: The effects of mass shootings on stock prices of firearm manufacturers in the U.S," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-29, May.
    16. Helna Almeida de Araujo Góes & Ghulam Fatima & Ronaldo de Oliveira Santos Jhunior & João Maurício Gama Boaventura, 2023. "Managing for stakeholders towards corporate environmental sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1561-1572, July.
    17. Arzi Adbi & Ajay Bhaskarabhatla & Chirantan Chatterjee, 2020. "Stakeholder Orientation and Market Impact: Evidence from India," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 479-496, January.
    18. Lee, Michael T. & Raschke, Robyn L. & Krishen, Anjala S., 2022. "Signaling green! firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-11.
    19. Gueler, Melike Sarah & Schneider, Sabrina, 2021. "The resource-based view in business ecosystems: A perspective on the determinants of a valuable resource and capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 158-169.
    20. Tuyen, Bui Quang & Phuong Anh, Do Vu & Mai, Nguyen Phuong & Long, To Quang, 2023. "Does corporate engagement in social responsibility affect firm innovation? The mediating role of digital transformation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 292-303.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:188:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-022-05224-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.