IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i4p295-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions for Antibiotic-Free Pork in Poland: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Kozera-Kowalska
  • Jaroslaw Uglis

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present the research findings on consumer preferences for purchasing pork labelled “raised without antibiotics.” Therefore, a study was conducted in order to: (1) investigate the way consumers view pork labelled “raised without antibiotics,” (2) explore the differences in socio-demographic factors which affect the way it is perceived, (3) determine the consumers’ willingness to purchase pork labelled “raised without antibiotics” and the factors affecting their purchasing decisions, (4) make an attempt to determine the profile of consumers who prefer pork labelled “raised without antibiotics.” Design/Methodology/Approach: The factual material covered by the study was collected through a survey questionnaire administered to a sample of 1177 Polish residents. The analysis included the consumers’ socio-demographic characteristics and preference for pork labelled “raised without antibiotics.” The study relied on the classification tree method, including the CHAID modeling technique. Findings: The study found that the consumer group who prefer meat labelled “raised without antibiotics” consists of women and people aged over 45. More than three-quarters of consumers would willingly buy it despite realizing that it costs more than available unlabelled pork products. Also, the respondents are inclined to pay more for pork raised without antibiotics, as more than half of them would accept a 10% to 20% surcharge over products not labelled this way. Practical implications: Faced with a growing number of health risks, including the presence of antibiotic residues in pork, both its consumers and its producers look for solutions to adequately address these issues. This includes producing pork in a non-antibiotic approach, on the one hand, and selling pork labelled “raised without antibiotics,” on the other. For many increasingly informed consumers, the above is an important driver of their purchasing preferences for pork. Originality/value: The results of research presented in this paper come to bridge a cognitive gap in understanding what drives the Polish population’s preferences for buying and consuming pork labelled “raised without antibiotics.” They also emphasize the importance of sustainable pork production, especially including the no-antibiotic farming systems used in making food safer and more health-beneficial.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Kozera-Kowalska & Jaroslaw Uglis, 2024. "Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions for Antibiotic-Free Pork in Poland: An Empirical Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 295-311.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:4:p:295-311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3518/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pork market; “raised without antibiotics”; RWA; pork raised without antibiotics; PRWA; consumer perceptions; sustainable pork production.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:4:p:295-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.